Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hillside Leisure -Right to Reject New Campervan? - ***Resolved***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Where I am very pleased and slightly surprised that they are being so helpful. It's a good start – but pardon my pessimism, don't be surprised if attitudes change.

 

I need to ask you if you have recorded these conversations? Have you read our customer services guide?

 

Have you done anything about starting a legal action? Have you actually invited Hillside Leisure to carry out an inspection?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where I am very pleased and slightly surprised that they are being so helpful. It's a good start – but pardon my pessimism, don't be surprised if attitudes change.

 

I need to ask you if you have recorded these conversations? Have you read our customer services guide?

 

Have you done anything about starting a legal action? Have you actually invited Hillside Leisure to carry out an inspection?

 

Hello BF,

Yes I have read the Customer Services Guide, thank you, and have started recording conversations. Yes, I thought it went quite smoothly with the bank but I take your point and respect your pessimism!

 

We haven't invited Hillside to carry out an inspection (though had wondered if we should today) and have engaged a solicitor. It feels like a bit of a see saw, trying to engage with the facts and not all the emotion we have about the whole sorry business. The holiday we had planned was with our niece who has just bought a caravan following her Mum's (our sister's) death from cancer, so it was such an important holiday, so the loss of it after all we went through was highly charged.

 

BF,you seemed to feel that we could do this ourselves, but I didn't feel confident enough. I might see if any of the auto engineers/experts in alarms might inspect for us here at home. I will keep you posted and thank you, again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for further sharing of information, I have contacted my bank to initiate the Chargeback process. I found them very helpful but they have informed me that the faulty goods/van needs to be in the hands of the merchant and they then have 15 days to act and if they don’t, the process of obtaining the refund can be initiated. So they can’t act until the van is returned.

 

I have been fortunate to have a friend who has a garage who feels any company should have the right to inspect a faulty vehicle. But, at the same time, Hillside tried to blame us for tampering and told us to take the van to Nissan in the first place. They never wanted to see it in the first 3 weeks. The element of mistrust here is so great, yet I don’t want to appear unreasonable.

 

I have also been looking at auto engineers and expert witnesses and all sorts to strengthen our position, but I can’t help noticing another week has gone by with a brand new, unlocked campervan sitting outside. The thought of court proceedings doesn’t fill me with joy, but I am wondering if this maybe what has to happen.

 

BankFodder your advice was to tell Hillside to make an appointment to come and inspect it here at our house, but then Chargeback cannot be initiated. Another week has passed, I have done more research but I am still unsure of my next best move. Any input welcome, thank you.

 

I agree, I think bankfodder has given you a missguided extreme view.

 

Start being reasonable and work with Hillside to get the car fixed. I think it was right they asked you to take it back to fiat to make sure it wasnt a manufacturer fault, they say it isnt (as far as they know) youve bought a modified vehicle, work with Hillside to repair. Don't threaten them, be reasonable and work with them. Get it fixed and re-start your relationship with Hillstart. As soon as you STOP threatening them they'll bend overf to help you....................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could easily do this yourselves. It's a shame you have engaged a solicitor because you will find that there will now be an exchange of correspondence and everything will simply get delayed. Don't imagine that a solicitor is going to leap into action I don't imagine that having a solicitor on your side is going to put the willies up the other side.

 

You should certainly have invited them to carry out an inspection – and you should do so now. You don't seem to realise that the point of it all is not necessary to get the inspection, but to get the paper trail showing that you have been as reasonable as possible so they can't later on say that they never had an opportunity to inspect the vehicle.

 

If we give you advice here, you should follow it.

 

Your solicitor will probably not know anything about the chargeback system. It won't be in his training or in his culture.

 

If you really want a solicitor working for you then frankly you have done it far too early and you just simply spending money.

 

I hear what you say about getting the vehicle to them before activating the chargeback. The only thing that I am concerned about is that once they have the vehicle in their possession, if there is any problem with the company and they disappear, they could disappear with your vehicle and also the money. On the other hand, if a chargeback process in hand then the bank would reimburse you because you had acted on their advice – except you won't be able to prove that, because you haven't recorded the call. Your solicitor also won't advise you to record calls. In fact your solicitor will have no idea as to what the law is regarding the recording of calls and may well even discourage you.

 

 

As you have now engaged a solicitor and so you are paying money for services, I think you need to decide whether to stick with your solicitor or to allow this forum to help you – but I don't think you can do both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you send them a letter before claim immediately. In the letter before claim you should set out what is wrong with the van, refer to the fact that you have let them know within the 30 day period, list out the events – that they have ignored you et cetera, invite them to come down and inspect the vehicle but tell them that in any event in 14 days you will be starting a claim against them in the County Court and without further notice. Tell them that you will be claiming any associated costs and also you intend to make a claim for the loss of your planned holiday and other plans.

 

One them also that you will be adding interest at the County Court rate of 8% to your claim.

 

Warn them also that as the claim will be going onto the fast track you will be claiming your costs. Tell them at the moment that you are acting in person but at some point you may decide to instruct legal professionals and that will incur further substantial costs which they will be required to pay once they lose.

 

I don't think there is much else you can do. If you don't take this action then you better stick with your solicitor. If you want, you can go through the chargeback process but as I have said, there is a risk that they receive the vehicle and then you lose the lot if they go belly up. This may be a remote possibility but you are talking about quite a lot of money and so I think you need to factor in as a possibility.

 

You came to us on the 27th. It is now about seven days later. I think it's about time you made a decision and acted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just looked at their website for their terms and conditions. Here's their Twitter feed - @HillsideCampers

 

It says "awaiting content".

 

https://www.hillsideleisure.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/

 

Go figure.

Hillside leisure - t&Cs awaiting content.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you DON'T ignore Hillsides offer to take it back and fix. What do you think a judge will look for when he reads the case, if it isnt already dismissed ? Seller agreed to fix, buyer refused to return......

 

I repeat start being reasonable, thats what judges look for.... They get fed up with completely unreasonable cases being put infront of them...

 

Its black and white to them. Who's been or being unreasonable........

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you send them a letter before claim immediately. In the letter before claim you should set out what is wrong with the van, refer to the fact that you have let them know within the 30 day period, list out the events – that they have ignored you et cetera, invite them to come down and inspect the vehicle but tell them that in any event in 14 days you will be starting a claim against them in the County Court and without further notice. Tell them that you will be claiming any associated costs and also you intend to make a claim for the loss of your planned holiday and other plans.

 

One them also that you will be adding interest at the County Court rate of 8% to your claim.

 

Warn them also that as the claim will be going onto the fast track you will be claiming your costs. Tell them at the moment that you are acting in person but at some point you may decide to instruct legal professionals and that will incur further substantial costs which they will be required to pay once they lose.

 

I don't think there is much else you can do. If you don't take this action then you better stick with your solicitor. If you want, you can go through the chargeback process but as I have said, there is a risk that they receive the vehicle and then you lose the lot if they go belly up. This may be a remote possibility but you are talking about quite a lot of money and so I think you need to factor in as a possibility.

 

You came to us on the 27th. It is now about seven days later. I think it's about time you made a decision and acted.

 

They havent ignored, they've said take it to the main dealer who has diagnosed the fault is with the modification, the said modifyer has asked for it to be retured for a full repair. OP is refusing and you are saying take them to court !! Bankfodder how can you justify such misguided very bad advise ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

BankFodder, just a general query, I would be grateful for your input. Is it considered bad form to have employed a solicitor and then take things on again oneself? I regret not having found my way here earlier, but, I just wondered if it’s regarded badly in the court system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no probably the otherway around

if cases drags on or turns out to be simple

the cost of solicitors comes in question as to if its financially worth their expense

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In respect of the defects, you don't have to ascertain the cause. You only have to ascertain that the defect exists. Can they confirmed that the alarm problem exists?

 

In the case of the payments, it's a shame you didn't use credit cards because you would have more protection. I'm not sure what the chargeback rules for payments of this size by means of debit cards are.

 

Maybe someone can help

 

The amount was in excess of £30k so paying using a CC would not have helped as S75 would not have applied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lawtreader, I think you seariously need to reconsider your actions. You have been offered a full repair, I think you are being completely unreasonable, its a minor issue with and easy repair, the court will not look kindly on you. Rememeber the retailer has rights as well as you do. You cannot just stick your head in the sand and demand a refund until all channels have been exhausted. You could lose at court and have to pay their costs, which could be considerable...

 

I suggest you reconsider and work with them and give them the opportunity to repair, if they don't fix it correctly then sue them, work with them not against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount was in excess of £30k so paying using a CC would not have helped as S75 would not have applied.

 

Its already been confirmed that it was purchased using two Debit Cards...but by the way Section 75 covers "consequential losses", as well as the cost of what you bought. This covers the costs caused by the problem with your purchase.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/75A

 

Although irrelevant to this thread

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This matter has been settled after a new head of sales talked to us, re established trust, came and inspected the vehicle and discovered the fault. What a difference when someone cares about their customers and listens. He seemed really concerned about what we had been through, wanted to work with us to put things right and I think, had he been in the job when all this started, the situation would never have escalated as it did. 

I thought Hillside were nothing but a bunch of belligerent bullies wanting to take the cash, not giving a toss about their customers or their service, but I feel quite differently now. I am so glad to report that this story has had a satisfactory conclusion. Thank you for all the information and support here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much indeed for bringing us up to date with this. I'm very pleased that it has been a positive outcome for you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Hillside Leisure -Right to Reject New Campervan? - ***Resolved***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...