Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Jersey SAR


JibTeenuc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

 

I'm planning to send a SAR to HSBC on behalf of a friend who holds a credit card, a current account, a savings account and a loan account with them.

 

 

My friend lives in Jersey, where all dealings with HSBC have been conducted.

 

 

Can anyone please confirm if a single SAR is sufficient to cover all of the above accounts and the correct address to which it should be forwarded, given the location being Jersey and I am unsure whether or not banks fall under the same legal jurisdiction and share the same administration offices as do those in the UK, or are classed as separate entities?

 

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure one essay I will be fine and you simply need to address it to any HSBC office in Jersey – even to his/her branch. Make sure the SAR asks for all personal data in respect of any matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no odds ain hsbc ad is fine see the address sticky on this forums homepage [Where you clicked post a new thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure one essay I will be fine and you simply need to address it to any HSBC office in Jersey – even to his/her branch. Make sure the SAR asks for all personal data in respect of any matter

 

 

 

That's fantastic to learn, so thank you.

 

 

I've taken a look at the updated GDPR template and I note it doesn't say "If you are not the person to whom this SAR should be addressed, please forward it to that department" (or similar) as a SAR used to. Is that because it is no longer necessary, or do you think I should include it...... just in case?

 

 

The ICO appears to be giving with one hand whilst taking away with the other, in general respect to the updated rules, it would appear.

 

 

Each side will be trying to wrestle these amendments to their advantage.

 

 

Thanks, again.

 

 

Jib

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no odds ain hsbc ad is fine see the address sticky on this forums homepage [Where you clicked post a new thread

 

 

Thanks.

 

 

I was just unsure as the date for that sticky is 2007 (over 10 years ago, so I wasn't sure if it was up to date) plus, I was concerned addresses on the Mainland and in Jersey might differ but it seems the new GDPR has prevented the bank's claiming incorrect addresses.

 

 

Then again..... I'm not sure the GDPR has any jurisdiction in Jersey, anyway.

 

 

We make our own laws, here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jersey isn't in the EU and isn't part of the UK so EU and UK data protection laws don't apply there, nor does the UK Information Commissioner have any powers in Jersey

 

But Jersey normally adopts local laws that mirror EU/UK ones and from a quick look at the website of the Jersey Information Commissioner that's what they've done with GDPR, with a new Jersey data protection act coming into force May 25th, same day as GDPR started here.

 

https://oicjersey.org/data-protection-new-law/

 

Do some research on the Jursey ICO site about SARs. I pretty confident it'll be the same as in UK although template wording may need tweaking to refer to Jersey law. This page, for example

 

https://www.oicjersey.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Infographic-Your-Information-Rights-Series-2-Right-to-Subject-Access-general.pdf

 

Your Jersey friend would send it to HSBC Jersey. HSBC Jersey is a wholly separate legal entity to HSBC UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for such detailed and valuable information.

 

 

As I am also minded to submit SARs to banks and other financial institutions with whom I have dealt over the years, I am guessing the same will apply to those in that I should address my SAR(s) to their local offices, rather than their UK ones.

 

 

One, though, troubles me.

 

 

I undertook a mortgage with NatWest a number of years ago and pretty much all of the correspondence I received from them was sent from their Isle-of-Man offices - although all my interviews were conducted here, in Jersey.

 

 

I guess I should send it to the Jersey office and let them figure out whose in-tray to deposit it in.

 

 

 

 

Jersey isn't in the EU and isn't part of the UK so EU and UK data protection laws don't apply there, nor does the UK Information Commissioner have any powers in Jersey

 

But Jersey normally adopts local laws that mirror EU/UK ones and from a quick look at the website of the Jersey Information Commissioner that's what they've done with GDPR, with a new Jersey data protection act coming into force May 25th, same day as GDPR started here.

 

https://oicjersey.org/data-protection-new-law/

 

Do some research on the Jursey ICO site about SARs. I pretty confident it'll be the same as in UK although template wording may need tweaking to refer to Jersey law. This page, for example

 

https://www.oicjersey.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Infographic-Your-Information-Rights-Series-2-Right-to-Subject-Access-general.pdf

 

Your Jersey friend would send it to HSBC Jersey. HSBC Jersey is a wholly separate legal entity to HSBC UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are in Jersey and dealt with Jersey financial institutions they will all be independent legal entities from the UK companies. Jersey is a separate legal jurisdiction. Address all SARs to the Jersey company you dealt with.

 

 

 

Isle of Man is different. It also is not in EU or UK but normally adopts IoM laws that mirror EU/UK law in matters like this. I've haven't done any research but my guess is IOM will also have put a new data protection into force which you will use to submit a SAR to an IOM bank. A bit of research should soon show you what the current IOM DP law is and how to submit a SAR. Again I'd think the UK SAR template will be fine to use with some tweaking to refer to IOM law. IOM banks are typically legally separate from both UK and Jersey banks, so send your SAR to the IOM bank who gave you the mortgage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're probably right in that, although I took out the mortgage in Jersey and dealt with NatWest Jersey staff on a face-to-face basis, the mortgage appears to have been issued by and administered through their IOM offices.

 

 

I'll check out the IOM address and forward it to them unless someone advises me to do otherwise.

 

 

Thank you.

 

 

If you are in Jersey and dealt with Jersey financial institutions they will all be independent legal entities from the UK companies. Jersey is a separate legal jurisdiction. Address all SARs to the Jersey company you dealt with.

 

 

 

Isle of Man is different. It also is not in EU or UK but normally adopts IoM laws that mirror EU/UK law in matters like this. I've haven't done any research but my guess is IOM will also have put a new data protection into force which you will use to submit a SAR to an IOM bank. A bit of research should soon show you what the current IOM DP law is and how to submit a SAR. Again I'd think the UK SAR template will be fine to use with some tweaking to refer to IOM law. IOM banks are typically legally separate from both UK and Jersey banks, so send your SAR to the IOM bank who gave you the mortgage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citi and lots of other creditors are based or were there

we've seen loads of SAR returns with their info Inc the jersey stuff.

 

pers id use their UK head office data address in the FCA register

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

 

But, unless you have lived "offshore", you will have no idea just how closed a shop it can (and does) become.

 

 

Ordinary rules don't apply and the judiciary is fiercely (if quietly) protective of its independence from the UK, the EU or any A N Other.

 

 

On a plus side, the UK "six year" retention of documents has never existed over here. Institutions are required, by law, to retain copies of documents ad infinitum.

 

 

Another plus is, being such a small place, you not only know what your bank manager looks like but also where he lives and (perhaps more importantly) drinks. LOL

 

 

 

 

Citi and lots of other creditors are based or were there

we've seen loads of SAR returns with their info Inc the jersey stuff.

 

pers id use their UK head office data address in the FCA register

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend is experiencing cold feet in sending a SAR to the bank, not wishing to unnecessarily upset them.

 

Additionally, we have dug out all the (albeit incomplete) details of the four accounts (1 x Credit Card; 1 x Savings Account; 1 x Current Account; 1 x Loan Account).

 

This includes the Loan account agreement (although none of the other actual agreements - only some of the statements).

 

The Loan Account does not mention "Payment Protection" or "Insurance" in any form that is obvious to us.

 

None of the other accounts' statements which have been retained appear to make any charges in favour of the bank other than the usual "Interest-In" (with the Savings account) and "Interest Out" and/or "Standing Charges" (with the Current and the Credit Card accounts). Indeed, the charges appear to be quite low overall.

 

What to do?

 

Is there any point in causing unnecessary tribulation to the bank, which appears to be (and have been) operating quite honourably (apart from the Loan account's interest rate seeming to be something of a pee-take, to me)?

 

If someone could help us out, we would be very grateful.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it make no odds as the sar could be for completion of your pers financial records

you don't have to even mention PPI

but if you don't think there is any then...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it make no odds as the sar could be for completion of your pers financial records..

 

 

Good point, well made.

 

 

I can't see any real harm in asking.

 

 

In the worst case scenario, all we've wasted is time, I suppose.

 

 

Thanks for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...