Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
    • have a look at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/451423-pra-letter-of-claim-old-barclaycard-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5256506 the docs in this thread are what you should get. if the agreement the correct date for signup and does the PRA or BC cover letter use the word reconstructed? dx
    • sounds like lesley. They'll respond some rubbish I'm sure.  
    • John Barnett had been giving a formal legal deposition against the plane manufacturer before his sudden death.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Time to.. sort my debts out..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi!

 

Happy new year.

 

right i need to sort my debts out...noddle credit report is sorted.

equifax and experian need to do more checks :|

 

Just a few basic questions to be honest, With regards to sorting out old debts and not having the paperwork/

 

Would i need to? Or can i send a subject access request without credit card numbers,account numbers etc?

realistic payment plan? Or another option to offer the lender a setttlement?

 

Im aware its best to deal with lender direct which is what ill try to do. Noddle is not the best though as it doesnt give you that much detail so ill need to wait till the others verify.

 

The debt being realistic isnt much id say at maximum £3500. its a lot to me but others i know it may not be.

 

That being said life is not that easy sitting with a score of 438. Do not get me wrong im not repairing my score to then get numerous credit cards and max myself out. Its simple things like renting or just simply applying for broadband!

 

Appreciated

Edited by Terminalpigeon
Link to post
Share on other sites

Also note, that just because debts don't show with the CRA (as 6 years have passed) - its does not automatically mean the debt is done and dusted

 

Unless in the wonderfully-heritage filled country known as Scotland ^_^

5 years and it gets extinguished I believe...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Currently Lowell have three debts they have ownership.

 

1 is from a very long time, sadly being a plonker that i am, i aknowedged the debt back in 2015 not thinking.

It was a shop direct debt.

They have reduced the amount dramatically since.

 

Can i ask a generic question, if they fail to produce a CCA agreement and being the debt is not listed on my credit file at all.

Does that mean that the debt is pretty much in the past and the most they could do is keep asking me for the payment?

 

The other is o2 but not really relevant to my question

 

The third is a very old orange which im paying next week as its £18 and on my credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

question WHY are you paying a DCA anything?

They are NOT bailiffs!!

 

you've been talking on the phone to them have you?

 

what do you mean you ack'd the debt with them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No no no, i dont talk to them on the phone. I am trying to get my debt sorted. Its under £1000 now and to be honest at the age i am if i ever hope for a reasonable life it needs sorting if only for my minds sake.

 

No back in 2015 i sent them an email requesting all information on debts they held, granted we are on 2018 now but i had others to clear.

 

I agree they are not baliffs obviously dx, thats why i have asked for the cca information from them to see what they hold and what they do not. What do you think i should try getting the debts sent back to the original creditors?

Link to post
Share on other sites

asking for info doesn't reset anything.

 

so what are your last payment date

and what are the defaulted dates?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well..

 

the shop direct is from 2007 or something crazy i cant even give you a figure or date when a payment was made.

 

Orange, pretty much the same,the £18 just looks like something that wasnt cleared up from a finished contract, however seeing its coming up as orange god knows when, maybe 2012,13? they switched everything to EE i thought eventually.

 

Now the o2, this is an interesting or rather not so, i am aware i did have an o2 contract but i disputed the cancellation charge. The odd thing is on equifax and noddle it doesnt show. Experian i cannot gain access to because "Apparently they cannot identify me" where as all the others can

Link to post
Share on other sites

silly question why do you think you must pay these?

it wont improve your CRF file one bit.

are they defaulted?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the calendar markers they mean nothing

what is the defaulted date from the debt summary for the orange one

the other 2 forget them too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

should say across the top

lender - balance - updated - status

under status does it say default

 

click the little orange down arrow to the right of there

 

2nd from bottom

date of default

need that please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey we got there....

 

so that will be on your file regardless to whatever you do till 17/4/20

you cant remove a default

paying wont help either

 

the default kills most credit for 6yrs.

 

so i'd not bother about ANY of them unless you get a letter of claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope urban myth paying a defaulted debt improves your score.

same as paying a DCA

better to burn the money.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope urban myth paying a defaulted debt improves your score.

same as paying a DCA

better to burn the money.

Like KLF did with a million quid, best not pay the DCA.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh ok,

 

So just so i clarify in my own mind.

 

Is this correct?

 

Any old debt that has defaulted over a certain amount of time that its fairly certain they will not go to court. Leave it?

 

Any Debt that you are in contract with and defaults, sort that debt out as a priority?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

what do you mean by in contract with [who] and defaults

a DCA cannot default a debt only the original creditor can

ignore the calendar markers they mean nothing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

your best bet is read some threads

the more you read

the stronger we become

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Currently Lowell have three debts they have ownership of
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...