Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Debt being chased in Germany


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2531 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just got a letter from Metropolitan Collection Services of Coventry.

They're pursuing an overdraft I had with HSBC.

Last activity on the account was I think December 2010.

 

Shortly after they withdrew the overdraft cos I wasn't paying into the account regularly.

The debt is now in the region of £1250.

 

I'm on benefits here and I can't afford to pay this of in a way they'd find satisfying.

 

They have also floated the possibility of taking me to court in 'the country where you live.'

 

Anyone got any advice on how I might call off the dogs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Metropolitan Collection Services are HSBC, they're their in-house collection team.

 

Technically there are reciprocal agreements between EU countries where cross-border action can be taken in a German court in order to obtain a judgment. In reality given the amount you allegedly owe it would not be financially viable for them to pursue, they will be more likely to sell the debt to an outside debt collection company and claim tax on the loss.

 

With it being an O/D there isn't a great deal you can do at the moment but either ignore or make a token offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would there be any realistic chance of them selling it to a german debt collection company?

 

Also, is it possible for an overdraft to become statue barred? My life ambitions are over here for the next few years, I plan to study which is going to be more enriching mentally than financially

 

I've read a little about how it's possible to extricate yourself from credit card debt thats been sold to a collections agency by requesting the agency prove the debt, which for the most part they can't do. Do you mean that it's impossible to do something similar with overdrafts?

 

I made a typo in my first post, I owe about £1450, i think £150-200 of this must be charges accrued since I last used the account. I'm guessing this sum would still be generally too small for them to chase?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would there be any realistic chance of them selling it to a german debt collection company?
They could but will be more likely to sell it to a UK based DCA. They sell the debts in large portfolios in the thousands at between 7 & 15% of the face value.

 

Also, is it possible for an overdraft to become statue barred?
Yes if no written admission or payment has been made for a period of six years (five if you lived in Scotland).

 

Do you mean that it's impossible to do something similar with overdrafts?
There is no written agreement with an overdraft normally so all they would need to produce are the bank statements.
Link to post
Share on other sites

THE GOLDEN RULE IS never, ever, contact a debt collection agency. Don't phone, don't write. Throw any letters they send you straight in the bin. If they have your telephone number, if a person you can't identify calls, ask them who they are BEFORE confirming your identity. They always introduce themselves by the first name and try to slur over where they are from. Then just tell them politely that they have the wrong number and hang up.

 

The agency will NOT enter into any form of Court process unless it is certain to be successful and they are sure of enforcement. Otherwise they are throwing money away with costs. If they get no feedback from you they cannot be sure that you live where they are writing to and will have no information about you.

 

They will send a few letters and if there is no response sell the debt on to another agency to recoup some of their investment. The process may then start again, but, eventually, they will give up.

 

Maybe for you it's too late to follow this advice BlackBeach but others take note?

 

Worked for me. I owed over £100,000 in unsecured debt. Was willing to deal with original creditors but they didn't have the patience to listen and sold the debts on. I wasn't going to pay the parasites and am well over half way to the debts being statute barred. Early on I was getting up to 100 letters a month but I ignored the lot and now there is only the odd one every now and then.

 

Chin up buddy they will do nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sold my house in England and moved abroad about a year later. I had a post redirect operating for two years to a friends house in England to get mail. I was actually staying with another friend pending going abroad. Because my debts were spread over about 15 creditors, I was getting sackfulls of mail from many different agencies. Because I never replied to any of them, didn't send them back, just binned them, they kept on writing to my old address long after I moved out of it. They didn't realise for a very long time that I wasn't there any more! It followed a simple pattern, I would get a few letters from one agency, then they gave up and passed it to another. Then they must have got my redirection address from Royal Mail, either legally or illegally, and some of them started writing direct to there. My friend marked those "Not at this address" and return to sender.

So they are still writing to addresses in England even though I left the country two years ago. That is what I mean when I say never ever talk to them. All they want to do is bully you and they can't do that if you don't speak to them. The threats of court action are totally empty. They won't take action unless they are sure of their ground or the risk throwing away court and legal fees. If they don't know where you are then the problem would be enforcement and they know this.

 

Now all I get (when I go back to England and collect my post) are maybe 1 or 2 letters a month. They have effectively given up. Not one of the debts has been taken to court. As I said I might have come to some arrangement with original creditors had they not been so intransigent when I had problems; but they have now all written the debts off so there is no way I will pay anything to these leeching parasites.

 

So, no contact at all is the way to go. Even if you have spoken to them, its probably not too late, break off all further contact, don't take any phone calls and mark all letters "gone away".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for all your replies earlier. I've still not been able to make any payments and I received another letter this morning. Dated the 6th of October, arrived on the 24th!

 

They say that if I don't give them £1245 by the 27th they'll want the full £1464. They say they'll transfer my account to "a local firm of lawyers who may take Legal Action."

 

I wonder if anyone knows the significance of a 15% reduction? What does that sort of move usually prefigure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers. This is getting to be a regular cycle! Every time I get one of these letters my heart goes into my mouth and I get visions of a hoard of German beurocrats and lawyers battering my door down, then I come on here and feel a little more at ease again. Hope it all works out like you all report!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I come back to this thread every time I get a letter. Can't help it, they give me the fear!

 

This one, also from Metropolitan Collection Services says that they're referring the account to a company called DG Solicitors (no further info given) who will contact me in the next 14 days. Also "they have been selected to work with you to help understand your present circumstances and where possible, agree an affordable and appropriate payment arrangement."

 

 

Anyone know what this means in practical terms? Does this sound like they're actually going to chase the debt? Or what they mean by "affordable and appropriate"? My fear all alon is that what they think of as affordable would seriously knock my life off track so I'm very nervous to speak to them without getting some advice over here

Link to post
Share on other sites

DG solicitors are infact the next desk along from Metropolitan Collection Services. ;)

 

DG Solicitors information

Company Name

DG Solicitors

 

Correspondence Address

12 Calthorpe Road

Edgbaston

Birmingham

B15 1QZ

 

 

 

 

Registered Address

C/O HSBC Bank Plc

8 Canada Square

London

E14 5HQ

 

 

 

 

Reg Company Number

00014259

 

Parent Company

HSBC Group

 

Consumer Credit Licence

0006343

 

Website

http://www.hsbc.co.uk

 

 

[edit]Director's Details

Non Executive Director

Anthony Robin Dominic Monro-Davies

 

Direct Postal Address

Milbourne House

Station Road

London

SW13 0LW

 

 

 

Non Executive Director

Peter Michael Shawyer

 

Direct Postal Address

8 Canada Square

London

E14 5HQ

 

 

 

Managing Director - UK Banking

Paul Anthony Thurston

 

Direct Postal Address

8 Canada Square

London

E14 5HQ

 

 

 

Non Executive Director

John Francis Trueman

 

Direct Postal Address

8 Canada Square

London

E14 5HQ

 

 

 

Non Executive Director

Mary Elizabeth Marsh

 

Direct Postal Address

8 Canada Square

London

E14 5HQ

 

 

 

Non Executive Director

Rosemary Elisabeth Scudamore Martin

 

Direct Postal Address

8 Canada Square

London

E14 5HQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at it from their point of view. Sending a few letters trying to give you the willies costs them a few pence in postage. Paying a REAL solicitor to write a letter would set them back £50, and it would still go in the bin. I don't know what the situation is in Germany but here, commencing and following court proceedings would set them back £100- £200 and no costs allowed for any solicitor they use. If they get no feedback from you, they don't know anything about you, and won't risk putting up those sort of sums with no guarantee of a return. So- they write between four and six letters and if they get nothing back they give up. You will get one- possibly two- letters from the in-house solicitor, then nothing more provided you don't reply.

 

As I told you, I speak from a wealth of personal experience here. I know it may be distressing to get threatening letters, but they are just full of wind. DCA's by and large don't want the expense and hassle of court proceedings especially abroad.

 

Learn the PO box return address on the back and put the letters in the bin unopened. You could return them marked "Not at this address" in German, but I doubt they would find their way back to England.

 

Treat these parasites with the utter disrespect they deserve!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never got anything from Bluestone Law. But whatever you get, ignore it, buddy. By replying you have confirmed that the letter reached you and that is what they want to hear. With respect, Horus, why bother to ask them to prove it? That makes it sound like you are willing to negotiate and that will only encourage them.. I have totally ignored the best part of 1,000 letters from a wide spectrum of DCA's and their pet solicitors and not a single one has done anything about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was advice I got here - I ignored HSBC, MCS and GT Law or whatever they're called then it went out to Bluestone I asked on here if I should send that letter and was told yes...so I did. Only thing I've had back is a list of payments which they alleged are statements and prove I made payments to HSBC. This list had my name, sort code and account number on it and was sent to an unverified email address. Considering taking legal action for a breach of the DPA at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you could, but if the company is American I believe that you would have to take action in their jurisdiction- not easy if you live in Europe.

 

What I have learned both at first and second hand is that these people just want you to "bite" and get involved in communication. If you don't communicate they don't do anything, except give up and stop writing. Therefore my advice always is- blank them. No matter what they say or threaten. They are all full of sh*t. I have seen off a good 20 or 30 DCAs just by ignoring them, so I believe it's good advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

german debt law.doc

 

 

Hi Blackbeach,

 

Hope you are enjoying the Glüwein!

 

AFAIK and I am no expert - the attachment gives the law as I see it currently.

 

In Germany having a debt is a big no no - which is why most German Credit Cards are linked to your bank account(s). Some are now providing 'proper' credit card accounts but they are difficult to get, especailly for an ex-pat....

 

Additionally it is not possible for the creditor to get a UK CCJ on you as this can only be given to individuals who reside in the UK, so forget about getting one - even if they do manage to get one by default there are ways to have this set-aside.

 

Fröhliche Weihnachten und ein gutes neuse Jahr!

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...