Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long does it take DM to make Decision ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4369 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm still waiting since February, after sending in the GL24, from getting Nil points in my IB to ESA Migration, I'm still on the assessment rate, still sending in Med Certs, can anyone say if this means I'm going to Tribunal or can it take this long for a DM to make contact.

 

When I called DWP call centre they have no idea where I stand, just say keep sending in Med Certs, I only want to know will I hear from a DM, or is it done deal and I'm going for Tribunal hearing, it's been hell not knowing anything.

 

Is this the norm for people, the DWP site states during the process once you submit the GL24 you will hear from the DM if they been able to overturn the ATOS points, but I've had no definite details from them, just the usual letter saying they will pay assessment rate till my appeal is looked at.

 

thanks for reading, just feeling so ill with worrying

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a backlog with reconsiderations but I wouldn't think the backlog is that big! So in my opinion I think the decision has not been changed by the DM and your claim has been referred to the Tribunal, and the Tribunal can be approx 6 months before it is heard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appealed via the GL24 in February, the DWP phoned me about six weeks later asking if I still wished to go ahead with the appeal, I said yes and the paperwork from the DWP arrived four weeks later, and the paperwork from the tribunal service a couple of weeks after that, My appeal hearing is not before 01/10/2012.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies, I'm worried as it does seem to me I would have had something by now, but when I called them they said I will hear from the DM in due course, they could not tell me if I was being sent to Tribunal or not as it does not show on their system. I'm going to phone again, I just want to get an answer as to what the DM's decision is, not just left in limbo, I thought they had to tell you not just send you to Tribunal without letting you know their decision first.

 

Osdset you say you had a call from them, that's what I mean, I've not heard a thing.

 

 

 

thanks again for your help guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

cocoriver,

Just a thought, did you state that you wanted to appeal on the GL24, or ask for a reconsideration?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi osdset, I'm not sure because I was told by DWP to go into Jobcentre for help and the GL24 was filled out by the man I saw there, he then faxed it on to the correct dept, I had no idea there was a difference, I was just told to send in a GL24 within one month of getting nil points letter, they don't offer information so if you don't no what to do it's a mine field.

I'm going to phone on Tuesday and try to find out, thanks for taking time to read my post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi osdset, I'm not sure because I was told by DWP to go into Jobcentre for help and the GL24 was filled out by the man I saw there, he then faxed it on to the correct dept, I had no idea there was a difference, I was just told to send in a GL24 within one month of getting nil points letter, they don't offer information so if you don't no what to do it's a mine field.

I'm going to phone on Tuesday and try to find out, thanks for taking time to read my post

 

Hmm, personally I would not have let someone else fill out the GL24, I take it you did not see what was written, for an appeal you normally state why you disagree with the DWP's decision, and ask for it to go to appeal.

 

I have no experience with claims migration but I know that in the case of a new claim for ESA, if a reconsideration is asked for benefits stop until the decision is made, you are still getting paid so I'm guessing he has requested an appeal.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem was when I got the letter saying I had nil points, I phoned DWP and they suggested they make an appointment for me at Jobcentre where someone would help with the forms, as it has never happened to me before I was unsure of the process. I did see the GL24 as he asked me what I'd like to be put on the form as my reasons for appeal, basically that I disagreed with the ATOS medical, Nil points etc, so that's basically what he put on the form, then faxed it off, a couple of weeks later I got a letter saying it had been received, and they would look at the decision and if it could be changed they would let me know, then I got a letter saying I would be paid assessment rate until decision on my appeal had been made.

 

I phoned and ask did that mean I was being passed to tribunal but was told, as it was not showing on the system they could not tell me, but I should hear from a DM in due course, just to keep sending med certs, that's it, nothing since then. Now in May, and very worried indeed.

 

thanks again for taking the time to read my posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so as others have said, it looks very much like the reconsideration has been done, the DM did not change the decision in your favour, so it has gone to the Tribunal. That's not great, but not a disaster either as the Tribunals do regularly find in favour of ESA claimants.

 

You may wish to read Site Team member Honeybee13's excellent sticky thread (the threads that appear in a kind of nasty greenish colour at the top of the forum) for more information about the appeals process.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Antone, yes very much looks to be that way, I realize now I never fully understood what was happening, I was waiting to hear from the DM and now think I already have, going by the letter they sent back in Feb. But when I called them to clarify either way they would not say if I was going to Tribunal as they just kept telling me it did not show on the system that I was, so it could go either way, seems to me the DM did not change the decision back in February and I've been waiting for Tribunal papers all this time without even knowing it.

 

It's just ever y thing I've read, ie DWP link to the Appeals process, states you will hear from the DM, so I stupidly thought I'd get another letter or phone call.

 

I feel really stressed that I failed to understand what was happening, it's really upset me. I don't know if I'll be able to attend the Tribunal but as everyone says, it's better to go.

 

Thanks again for your help everyone, and best of luck to you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

just a thought here, have you when you have rung the dwp about this ever been offered a call back from the decision makers? If not ring and request one. They will be able to tell you whether or not it is going to tribunal.

 

Also have you seen a copy of the assessment report that would help you emensely in your appeal arguing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is what I got told regarding the delays etc.

 

the time the appeal/letter is recieved by sorting office is recorded so they use that date to decide if you appealed on time, however fromt hat point it can easily be many weeks before a DM looks at it. Most likely your appeal is sitting in a pile waiting to be looked at, once my last appeal was looked at the DM made a decision the same day.

 

As I understand it you will know if they submitted to trbunal because when they do that you have to be sent a copy of the documents related to the case.

 

It seems the DWP have issues communicating via letters and too many people are just left waiting in silence.

 

Asking for a callback from the BDC in my experience speeds things up. As they usually will look for your stuff first before ringing you back.

 

I rememebr ringing up been told by the call centre staff not to worry as the tribunal service has delays, and I pushed to find out the DM hadnt even got to it yet. I knew from past experience of tribunals I would get documentation when it gets submitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes I've made several calls, mostly to the call centre staff, with different responses, ranging from it takes months for appeals to be looked at, to no your not necessarily going to tribunal yet, I had one call back with regard to being asked to send in a follow on med cert, I call to say it had been done but the call centre said it had not arrived so they gave me a call back, the lady that called me just took the details of the med cert and said she would update it there and then, but had no other information for me.

 

My last call, Tuesday this week, I was again told, nothing on the system saying I was going to Tribunal, can take months to be looked at and could go either way, but most people do have to go to Tribunal, just wait.

 

I may call again next week, and ask for a call back

 

thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...