Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employment Support Allowance Refusal - Next Stage Tribunal Advice please?


Wayne C
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am writing this for my friend who is in the process of appealing against Zero Points at the Atos Medical and 0 Points he recieved over the telephone in an unexpected phone assessment at 8.45am a couple of weeks ago via a DWP assessor

 

My friend suffers from the following things which severely limit his day to day activities, so much so that I am having to ask these questions for him!

 

1. Ostemyelitis - infection of the leg bones in the past which causes pain and swelling to his lower limbs

2. Depression - On Medication for this

3. Anxiety and problems interactiing with others due to stress - he is seeing a Cognative psychotherapist to help him interact with others

4. Urinary tract disorders which givce him constant pain and as yet have yet to be identified why

5. Back Problems

6. Hypertension ( diagnosed two weeks after his appeal )

 

When my friend had the initial atos medical he was in a severe anxiety state to the point of feeling on the verge of being ill in the medical room the assessor ( doctor ) took no interest in this and continued to ask the questions, the lady who phoned him asked about other things which he says he told her about on the phone but there was no alteration in her assesment he still recieved no points what so ever!!.

 

He is very worried about what to do where to turn to and got so stressed reading the 60 page document they sent ( including the medical practitioners report which seems to disregard most of what he tells me he said in the room.

 

He has 14 days to send the letter to the local tribunals service please can anyone offer advice as to what he has to do.

 

Thanks Wayne

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Wayne,

 

I'll do my best to help.

 

I'm a bit confused when you say that "he has 14 days to send the letter to the local tribunals service..".

 

You need to send the appeal form into the DWP / BDC, and not the Tribunal Service.

 

First things first (I've been through the Appeal process myself once before, and am going through it a second time currently).

 

Download the DWP GL24 Appeal Form here -

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Diol1/DoItOnline/DG_4017514

 

Print it off, and fill it in, stating that you wish to appeal against the decision of finding him 'fit for work', on the basis if his ill health (specifying briefly the health issues).

 

Send it Recorded Delivery. You must send it asap - ie within 14 days of the date of the zero points decision, to his usual local DWP / Benefit Delivery Centre office; ie - the same address to which your friend sent his Doctor's Notes.

 

Once he's done that, come back to the forum, and we'll kindly help you with what to do next.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello to add some things

 

he has had the Medical after filling in the pack initially last September, He was denied ESA as he scored 0 points, he appealed filling in the form and sending it in within the specified time frame, is now on ESA assessment level of £65 a week, the lady who phoned him was a lady who re assessed his condition over the phone, she was only on he says for 5 minutes he has received her letter which again gave him no points , next stage is the Tribunal

 

so in a nutshell he has

 

1. Had Atos Medical

2. Recieved Zero Points letter

3. Appealed with the relevant form

4. Been reassessed over the phone ( he was totally unprepared for this and had been up all night the night before and tired out )

5. has just got a letter from the Tribunals service saying he has 14 days to either say yes or no to a tribunal

 

IS it true that they only look at how he was on the date of the medical on November last year as he is significantly worse than he was then probably due to this I may add!

Edited by Wayne C
Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically yes they look at how he was then. Also would add that diagnosis in itself means zilch wrt an ATOS medical so the list of diagnosis is irrelevant to it. What matters is whether your friend can do x, y and z tasks. So his evidence needs to say what s/he can't do and why, sometimes the why can involve a diagnosis but you would need to expand on why practically as to what s/he has difficulty doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello to add some things

 

he has had the Medical after filling in the pack initially last September, He was denied ESA as he scored 0 points, he appealed filling in the form and sending it in within the specified time frame, is now on ESA assessment level of £65 a week, the lady who phoned him was a lady who re assessed his condition over the phone, she was only on he says for 5 minutes he has received her letter which again gave him no points , next stage is the Tribunal

 

so in a nutshell he has

 

1. Had Atos Medical

2. Recieved Zero Points letter

3. Appealed with the relevant form

4. Been reassessed over the phone ( he was totally unprepared for this and had been up all night the night before and tired out )

5. has just got a letter from the Tribunals service saying he has 14 days to either say yes or no to a tribunal

 

IS it true that they only look at how he was on the date of the medical on November last year as he is significantly worse than he was then probably due to this I may add!

 

Ok.

 

Yes, your friend now needs to send back the form to the Tribunal Service, confirming that he does want a Tribunal Hearing.

 

Remember - Don't tick the box, where it says "Are you available for an earlier, short notice Hearing?"

 

This will give your friend a good six months to prepare.

 

Your friend can seek help with preparing his Appeal letter from the CAB. They may attend the hearing with him too.

Edited by lee100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

There's also the forum sticky on appeals and tribunals. Even if your friend has help from the CAB, at least one person from the forum used the sticky template for their submission for the tribunal and Welfare Rights said it was very helpful.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hear, hear HB!

 

I have to thank you HB for originally posting your sticky template for the tribunal.

 

I won! (Eighteen months back now)

 

Silly me, pushed myself back into work too soon.

 

So, had to back to assessment rate (CAB are appealing this, as it seems my WRAG should've been reinstated), have a second medical, and now an upcoming second appeal!

 

:|

 

Thanks again though HB, for your helpful template.

 

Wayne, have a look. It's a great format to use.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS - Just hope I win my second one.

 

Very stressed but I'm prepared this time, and have had kind support from the CAB.

 

The CLS lady will also be coming with me to the Hearing.

 

Sorry Wayne. I'll shut it now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you provide a link to the template please?.

 

Also I have just re read his Atos Assessment and the Dr who was an assessor was very aggressive in tone with him and repeatedly said " I didnt ask you that" and also said on many times " I Dont understand what you mean?, but has put on the assessment Efficient communication???

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you provide a link to the template please?.

 

Also I have just re read his Atos Assessment and the Dr who was an assessor was very aggressive in tone with him and repeatedly said " I didnt ask you that" and also said on many times " I Dont understand what you mean?, but has put on the assessment Efficient communication???

 

Hi,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?251737-Appealing-or-going-to-a-Tribunal-Some-useful-information(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wayne, what you've illustrated will be a good point to bring them up on, in that what was said at your friend's assessment, contradicts what is in his report.

 

Follow the template, and go through point - by - point on his report, marking any discrepancies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im a bit concerned though as the assessor who wrote the report seems to have carried on regardless , he told her he felt physically sick and asked for a drink of water, she still ploughed through with the barage of questions telling him as I say " I dont ask you that!! " , Apparently the lady who re assessed on the phone siad that any complaints should be sent to Atos, seems bizarre considering they based their assessment on this report and agree with the findings after re assessing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wayne, I'm afraid what you're telling us is normal here. Have a read around the forum and you'll find countless examples. It happened to me too. I think it's partly the LiMA software and the dropdown box options, but the assessors really don't get good press.

 

The only thing you can do is use the DWP's own system against them, which is what the template does.

 

I won my tribunal, I now know lee100 did [signature changed btw, you're on it now] and a few other people from the forum have as well. I hope there are others who haven't told us, I'd be very happy to hear if they did.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wayne, the woman sounds utterly atrocious!

 

Par for the course though. Ask your friend to try not to take it personally, as most people 'fail' these assessments, only to win their appeals.

 

The CAB will also put in a formal complaint to ATOS, on his behalf (mine has done just that).

 

He'll be ok.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask please if they they only go on the interview medical thing how will he have a hope of winning this thing?, if they dont consider anything after the Medical took place, he tells me that they didnt really ask him anything about how he felt in himself and looking at certain areas of the form Atos did they said, did not appear to be trembling wasnt sweating over much etc, surely saying you felt sick and such is a sign your not up to the drilling they give out!!

 

I mean just because someone isnt sweating like that Comedian fella at mEdical and not shaking like a leaf doesnt correlate to how someones thinking inside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The tribunal panel will listen to and believe what your friend tells them about his health. Any supporting evidence from his medical advisers will also help.

 

Please try not to get too hung up over the unfairness you see in Atos; it's something we all have to deal with. What you and he need now is a logical argument against their report.

 

And who knows, maybe the DWP decision maker will overturn the decision before it goes to tribunal.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And who knows, maybe the DWP decision maker will overturn the decision before it goes to tribunal.

 

HB

 

 

The person DWP rang him up the day after he went to a funeral at 8.45 in the morning he told the person all about the way he felt etc she was on 5 minutes and said she would re evaluate his points guess what Zero Points???

 

A;so it siad no supporting evidence supplied , none was asked for in the phone call and it was completely out of the blue, sort of like a telephone marketing thing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask Honeybee since he has had the medical he has been referred to a Psychotherapist as he hardly leaves the house and then reluctantly is that relevant to his case, I feel its relevant but I read earlier that they only look at what was put on the assessment form, surely drs letters stating that he has mental health issues, which the GP states haven't been helped to improve via this appeal are relevant

Link to post
Share on other sites

If by assessment form you mean Atos, then absolutely doctors' letters are relevant. You're into tribunal territory now and it's different.

 

If I may, I would suggest that you read some other threads about people here who've been to tribunal because there are lots. My own experience is limited to my own tribunal and you need more information than that.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...