Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evening all,

 

I've had a pretty bad week resulting in a potential 'buyer' for my '06 Golf TDI stealing the key (which i only discovered the next day as they swapped it with an identical one from another vehicle) and stealing the vehicle from outside my house overnight.

 

I have followed the standard protocol and notified the police and my insurer. The claim has been referred to the underwriters, however I have been warned that there is the following clause in my policy which way result in the claim being rejected:

 

"Loss of or damage to the vehicle by someone who got it by trickery, fraud or deception"

 

I've narrowed down the only possible time when the key could have been stolen, which was when they 'checked it worked when turning on/off the passenger airbag'. I was standing behind them at the time but it was dark so did not notice anything out of the ordinary. This was the only time when they had the key as I didn't leave them unattended with it at any point.

 

My question pre-emptive in essence as I'd like some advice on how I would go about mounting a legal challenge against my insurer should they decline the claim.

 

I really can't afford to lose the value of this vehicle which still has over £8k owing on it.

 

Thanks in advance for any advice.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have any problems, speak to the FOS.http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/contact/index.html

 

They may have had dealings with this sort of issue and may be able to shed some light on what your rights are.

 

( This [problem] was highlighted on BBC's real hustle. The advice was to never allow the prospective buyer to touch the keys, as if you did, it would only take a second to swap them.)

Edited by unclebulgaria67

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be the basis for a legal challenge?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The application of a contract clause is unfair ?

 

There are apparently FOS complaints that have been upheld in the policyholders favour. They have deemed that the policyholder had acted in a reasonably careful way and should not be penalised for having a criminal act committed against them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice and link. I'll see what their initial appraisal comes back with on Mon/Tues and then look to pursue from there. There is no way the insurance company can accuse me of not being careful as I was either in posession of the keys or standing right there when they apparently did the swap.

 

Have now watched the real hustle episode which is a bit of an eye opener - I was even more careful than the car salesman (not letting my car get in my line of sight) but that said It was the absolute last thing I was expecting to happen which is why they got away with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

i really feel for you

 

i had my ford transit van soteln from the front of a clients house whilst working in the back garden

 

i locked the van and did everything normally

 

Fortis insurance reckon the back doors were open and i had told an investigation company this fact (not true either way) and a work collegue with me at the time had mentioned this to me on his returning to the vehicle to collect materials9that the doors were open)just not true

 

i havent been negligent and never expected this to happen the cost has bee n a rea lblow and in all i have had t oborrow to bu ya nbew van and the cost of stolen van and some tools totally £6.5k

the van was never recovered aftr stolen on 20/8

 

I have rebutted the decision of fortis through my insuracne agent van compare and the financial ombudsmen and if thats doesnt work i will appoint my solicitor to challenge the decison

 

all i know my van was stolen and that i didnt expect it thats seems to be the troubel youve got to be 100% alert to every [problem] al lthe time

 

i wont give in to fortis and will go to court to deny any penalty claim against me of being negligent

 

insurance companies will lie and exagerate to not pay a claim so the financial ombudsmen and later a solicitor maybe needed to defend your rights

 

best of luck iain

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go tot he FOS, lodge a complaint. Based on what your saying if you were standing behind them and there was nothing more you could have done, you may have more of a case, it will not be clear cut though. If you left the key, went to the house etc, then it's different.

 

Re the van, do you still have both keys? On paper it's impossible to take a modern vehicle in a short space of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a side note. When I lived in South Africa a [problem] at a local main dealer garage was for the driver to copy the key when the car was in for service. He would then sell on the copy of the key and the thieves would wait for the correct opportunity to steal the vehicle. It was easier to steal the car when the person was at work rather than from their home as most homes are heavily guarded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi yes thankyou for your response and help

 

i bought van at auction one key and one fob

i have them or did until insurance investigators took them as part of their enquiry

 

i reckon vehicle went in about 30-40 mins period

so all i can think is that thief was i nvehilce tamperin gdurin gthat period of course i was woirkin gat back of hosue and cant confirm or witness any of this

 

this is probally my worst scenario in 30 years driving no payout 250 tpft til feb 11 and advised on £1000 fully cop + in march 11

and non was my fault

 

thnaks iain

 

 

 

 

Go tot he FOS, lodge a complaint. Based on what your saying if you were standing behind them and there was nothing more you could have done, you may have more of a case, it will not be clear cut though. If you left the key, went to the house etc, then it's different.

 

Re the van, do you still have both keys? On paper it's impossible to take a modern vehicle in a short space of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Evening all,

 

I've had a pretty bad week resulting in a potential 'buyer' for my '06 Golf TDI stealing the key (which i only discovered the next day as they swapped it with an identical one from another vehicle) and stealing the vehicle from outside my house overnight.

 

I have followed the standard protocol and notified the police and my insurer. The claim has been referred to the underwriters, however I have been warned that there is the following clause in my policy which way result in the claim being rejected:

 

"Loss of or damage to the vehicle by someone who got it by trickery, fraud or deception"

 

I've narrowed down the only possible time when the key could have been stolen, which was when they 'checked it worked when turning on/off the passenger airbag'. I was standing behind them at the time but it was dark so did not notice anything out of the ordinary. This was the only time when they had the key as I didn't leave them unattended with it at any point.

 

My question pre-emptive in essence as I'd like some advice on how I would go about mounting a legal challenge against my insurer should they decline the claim.

 

I really can't afford to lose the value of this vehicle which still has over £8k owing on it.

 

Thanks in advance for any advice.

 

David

 

Dear David,

My Mercedes CLK '57 has been stolen when the "buyer" asked me show him the spare key. I started up the car with the spare key then he got in,was satisfied that everything works and gave it back to me.15 min later when i checked on the car it was gone. I later realised that my spare key has been swapped with an identical one.

My insurance company says that its not likely i will get the money back because it was "theft by deception"

I understand that your was stolen in the same way. Have your insurance company paid up? Could you please give me any advice as to how I should go about it?

thank you in advance

Ana

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...