Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with Council Tax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5336 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Just some information "Please"

 

I have been paying my council tax which is normally due on the 5th of each month.

 

My Payments.............................. Councils requested Payments

Date........................Payment Balance

(20 April 2009...........£140.00..£1,247.10 Paid)....(05 April 2009 £136.10 £1,251.00)

 

(13 May 2009...........£147.10..£1,100.00 Paid).....(05 May 2009 £139.00 £1,112.00)

(10 June 2009...........£160.00..£940.00 Paid).......(05 June 2009 £139.00 £973.00)

(08 July 2009............£160.00..£780.00 Paid)........(05 July 2009 £139.00 £834.00)

(18 August 2009.......£160.00...£620.00 Paid).......(05 August 2009 £139.00 £695.00)

(02 September 2009..£160.00...£460.00)..............(05 October 2009 £139.00 £556.00)

(30 September 2009..£160.00...£300.00)..............(05 November 2009 £139.00 £417.00)

(28 October 2009......£160.00...£140.00)..............(05 December 2009 £139.00 £278.00)

(25 November 2009...£140.00...£0.00)..................(05 January 2010 £139.00 £139.00)

.......................................................................(05 February 2010 £139.00 £0.00)

 

Yesterday 17/08/2009 I received a Final Notice dated 13/08/2009 sent 2nd class post from the council but to the best of my knowledge I have NOT received any reminders. As you can see from my list of payments I am actually in front on my payments as of July. My question is if the council sort a liability order would they succeed.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Phone the muppets at Council today they say they have sent out reminders (Not Received) and that unless I setup a direct debit or pay in full they will issue a summonds. This being despite the fact I am in front of paying my council tax now by £75.00 over the ten monthly payments. They have rejected my payment plan as above. Seem to me all they want to do is con another £85.00 out of me.

 

Will keep you posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

The relevant legislation allows proof of postage as proof of delivery.

 

They would get the L/O granted as once the final notice goes the years balance is due in full so legally you are now behind as you owe the remaining balance due for the year.

 

Its a bit unclear with the way the formatting has gone but if the payments are due on the 5th and your payments are shown on the left the then they have been late on every instalment which would trigger the reminders.

 

Although, to be honest, the system we use at the my authority will issue reminders in the same way as technically it is issuing them right however we usually re-calculate a persons instalments if they are ahead to give then the leeway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ss002d6252

 

Thank You for yor reply, You say that legislation allows for proof of postage to be used as proof of delivery yet the envelope that contains the Fianl Notice only has a second class printed stamp on it their is no postmark showing the date it was posted and nothing to show proof of postage. SO I think a request under the freedom of information act is called for asking them to provide the proof of postage for the aledged reminders is called for. I shall also ask for copies of my last 2 years payments. As I paid the same way for the last two years with no problems. In fact for the year 2007-2008 I over paid by approx £120.00. For the Year 2008-2009 I over paid by 58p.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should be able to provide a list of the print run on which the FInal Notice/Reminders were printed on and then the relevant bulk postage for those final notice/reminders.

 

Unfortunately the fact that you have paid that way for the last 2 years wont prevent the issuing of the liability order as it will have been obtained legally, What it may do is to sway the decision of the local authority to withdraw the notice and re-input a payment arrangement.

 

In legislation a Reminder can be issued from the day after the payment was due and requesting that payment be made within 7 days. What happens in reality is that the L/A's wait a week or so for admin reasons/late payments clearing before issuing the reminders.

 

This delay is purely at the council's discretion so it may be that they have tightened up this year and for example they are running the reminders after payment is 5 days late rather than 7 days late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

One other question for you how long does it take for the council to raise the summons after issuing the final notice. Notice issued on the 13th August 2009 received on the 17th August 2009. Payment of £160.00 made on the 18th August 2009.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Phoned the council again today have agreed to setup a direct debit for the balance. The council will devide the outstanding balance by the number of payments left e.g £620.00 / 5 = £124.00 to be paid on the 7th of each month. I like to get my rip off tax paid before December is their anything in the regulations to stop me paying extra at the postoffice.

 

Finally I court this council out? the council say it takes 4 working days for a payment made at the postoffice to reach them, In fact they insisted that was correct. We went through the dates on which they received the payments

 

Payment received by the council

 

21st April

14th May

11th June

9th July

19th August

 

5 times I court them out this makes me believe they are prone to bending the truth.

 

I know for a fact that another council solicitors in my area are not adverse to committing purjury and perverting the course of justice to save having to repay £4.5 million pounds in illegal parking tickets.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All

 

I sent a letter under the Freedom of Information Act to this council registered post on the 22/08/2009 as follows.

 

FOIA Request

 

Dear Sir or Madam:

 

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act,.

 

Please supply the following information held about me by the Council Tax Office Eastbourne Borough Council Account Number 0000000000

 

1) Proof of Postage for the two Council Tax reminders that they claim to have sent on the following dates (17 April 2009) (13 May 2009)

2) Proof of Postage for the Final Notice dated 13/08/2009

3) A full statement of accounts for my Council Tax year 2007-2008 to include payment dates

4) A full statement of accounts for my Council Tax year 2008-2009 to include payment dates

 

 

Under the Freedom of Information Act you have 20 days to comply

 

 

Thank you for your assistance.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

I recieved a letter on the 11/09/2009 with the payment history for the last two years, today 12/09/2009 I received copies of the two reminders and final notice only NO proof of postage. I now consider this council to be in breach of the FOIA as they have failed to provide the information requested.

 

Can anyone suggest a letter format for my next letter to this council

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I now have it in writing from the horses mouth that reminders and final notices are sent out automaticly by second class post they have NO proof of postage. So it would seem that this council is not keeping a record of batch posting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will have records - the system will show that a print run of summonses etc was made and the post room will have a record of a bulk postage being made on the day they were posted - even if they can't literally track each single letter it should settle the issue with a magistrate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...