Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry I have been confused by Statute Barred meaning. I thought with Statute Barred the debt cannot be chased 6 years after you have stopped paying.  Originally I set up a payment arrangement with all the companies around 2008 when things went horribly wrong. At that time the payment arrangement was with the original creditors.  I still have one of the original creditors who I pay each month (Cap1). I thought that if you make a payment arrangement you have to stick to that situation throughout. Also, MDR (Moorcroft) have been taking a monthly payment on behalf of M & S Bank for about 5 years. When I sent MDR a CCA request I got a copy of the original agreement sent to me directly by M & S Bank about 5 weeks after my CCA request. Sorry for my ignorance but would you suggest I stop paying all including Cap1 who are the original creditor? TIA
    • London1971 without divulging too much into his mental health he has issues regarding anything to do with government and so is it ok to fill the forms provided and what do I put on there  thanks  
    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Creditors wont accept offer of final settlement - NDR, Natwest, Cahoot


Rochester111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6094 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help - I am new to the forum so hi to you all.

 

I am trying to find out if I am being lied to.

 

Long story - wont bore you with details, But I am in debt to Littlewoods Catalogue for £2647. It is one of a number of debts I am trying to settle. I have managed to raise a pot of money to try to offer final settlements to each creditor but it is not enough to pay debts in full. I used the letter that was shown in one of the threads to offer final settlements to each one.

 

Barclays Bank - no problem - accepted offer

NatWest wont budge they want the full amount

Cahoot wont budge also threatening to pass debt to DCA

 

NDR ignored my offer then when I phoned them they said that because the debt is for a catalogue and there is no interest added (like with credits cards etc) that they cannot lower the amount owed. Is this true or are they just trying to pull a fast one.

 

I have explained that the reason I want to settle all debts now is that I have been diagnosed with MS and I do not know how many years of work I will be able to do before I have to give up or take a lower paid/parttime job and then they will be very unlikely to get the rest of it paid any way. Better to settle for a lump sum now I thought.

 

To add insult to injury I have just been turned down for DLA too even though I have difficulty walking properly and even more trouble with trying to walk any kind of distance. But that is a whole different issue.

 

I just feel there is too much to handle at the moment and I want to simplify my life!!

 

Grateful for any advice or info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA, is that when you ask them for a copy of a signed agreement? I know that I signed papers when I started the credit card, Cahoot was done on line so no signature, Littlewoods I can't remember ever signing one.

 

If I have been paying small amounts would this not be me showing I accept I owe them the debt?

 

I don't think there were any cahrges. When I first negotiated reduced payments I got Littlewoods to pay back the admin charges.

 

I would need to check with Cahoot account but I think interest may still be added on this one but no additional charges

 

Natwest have frozen interest and no other charges are being added.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you should send them a CCA request.....you may have signed an agreement, BUT do they still have a copy ? was the agreement properly executed ? will they send you just a copy of an application form ? will they provide one within the timeframes ? a lot of questions waiting for a lot of answers.....!!!

 

As for the small amounts you have been paying I think you are allowed to challenge a debt at any stage....

 

Just send them a CCA request letter for each - certainly at this stage it puts the accounts into dispute immediately....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, there is a lot more to this CCA stuff than I had thought. I will get on and do this today.

 

Thanks so much for your help, I feel much more positive than I did before.

 

Ooh one last question, when I send the letters do I stop paying the monthly payments or should I keep them going until it is settled?

 

Cheers

 

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is entirely your decision, but what most people tend to do as far as I know is they stop paying AFTER the default period that is 12 working days + 2 days grace after you send the CCA request.

 

Also do not hand sign the letter.....and send it via Guaranteed Delivery, with a £1 postal order. And you may also like to add at the top of the letter - I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read a thread the other day, and it was stated that littlwoods have never been able to produce a Credit agreement. However after the 12+2+31 days you stop paying them, they will probably register a default with all three CRA's. This will give you the problem of trying to get it removed from your file. You could let them Default then point out the fact that the debt is unenforcable, and would they reconsider your offer of settlement

Link to post
Share on other sites

sdorry to hijack your thread bu ti am in a similar situation as you though iCCA them they give a copy which wasn't conform to CCA 1974 for credit card so i sent a cheque as full anf final offer they cashed in asi have a proof but still chasing me for th emoney. alrthoughwhen i complained to the police they told me that some of the document they sent me was a delioberate attemtp of deception and fraud so don't knwo whart to do now ? anyone any idea ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read a thread the other day, and it was stated that littlwoods have never been able to produce a Credit agreement. However after the 12+2+31 days you stop paying them, they will probably register a default with all three CRA's. This will give you the problem of trying to get it removed from your file. You could let them Default then point out the fact that the debt is unenforcable, and would they reconsider your offer of settlement

 

 

Hmmnnn not so sure about the stopping paying after that amount of time, once the 12 working days has expired the debt enters into default and is unenforcable. there fore at that point you can refuse any further payments until their compliance with the CCA.

 

in addition, the rights to issue default notices come under the CCA 1974 s.87-s.89 therefore once the account in itself enters a default under s.77 or 78 the debt is unenforcable and in my humble opiniion the creditor loses the right to issue a default notice as, issuing such notice is an act of enforcement in itself.

 

Littlewoods,Kays et al are notorius for not ensuring that customers sign credit agreements before they issue them credit. however that said they have been known upon occiasion to actually have a copy of the agreement.

 

its always worth sending a CCA request though

 

 

regards

 

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

That makes sense.

 

I think it is highly unlikely that Littlewoods have anything like a credit agreement on record as I started this account many many years ago (probably over 15 years ago). I would be very surprised if they have any of the original application paperwork on file still.

 

Many thanks for your comments, will take all this on board

 

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

It funny as I have a littlewoods account and its actual in credit and they sent me a new CCA the other day to fill in. I of course sent it straigh to the dustbin:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange, maybe with all the thousands of letters they areprobably getting demanding proof of CCAs, they are trying to get existing customers who are in credit to sign CCAs in case they ever go into debt!

 

Bolting horse, stable door?

 

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmnnn not so sure about the stopping paying after that amount of time, once the 12 working days has expired the debt enters into default and is unenforcable. there fore at that point you can refuse any further payments until their compliance with the CCA.

 

in addition, the rights to issue default notices come under the CCA 1974 s.87-s.89 therefore once the account in itself enters a default under s.77 or 78 the debt is unenforcable and in my humble opiniion the creditor loses the right to issue a default notice as, issuing such notice is an act of enforcement in itself.

 

Littlewoods,Kays et al are notorius for not ensuring that customers sign credit agreements before they issue them credit. however that said they have been known upon occiasion to actually have a copy of the agreement.

 

its always worth sending a CCA request though

 

 

regards

 

paul

 

 

I've just finished reading your own thread and correct me if i'm wrong but they issued you with a default. I'm not trying to be argumentative but I would have thought it prudent to give people as much information as possible. As well as possible outcomes to their actions regarding CCA's and Littlewoods. Regardless of what the law states Littlewoods will issue a default and continue to chase people for the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, don't sign anything when writing to Littlewoods. Even though Littlewoods don't hold agreements they insist that they have the right to carry on processing data. NDR and Littlewoods are a nightmare to deal with. My own case is with TS and I have sent the file to both the CE and Company Secretary. Case of waiting now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris W

 

No problems, i agree that it is prudent to give people as much help and info as possible.without websites such as this one there would be many many consumers being shafted without knowing thier rights , atleast with the CAG people get a wide range of help on a wide range of subjects which can only be to the benefit of the consumers

 

in my opinion though,with regards to when to stop paying creditors, when the debt enters the default stage at the end of the 12 working days as described in the CCA1974 then you can quite legitimatley stop paying any creditor who hass failed to comply with their obligations under the Act

 

 

Littlewoods have not issued me with a Default notice as yet and i will challenge any such notice should they be foolish to do so.

 

in addition it is my opinion thatthey have lost such right to issue the said notice as they have failed to comply with the CCA 1974

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...