Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Brachers Solicitors - Anyone had dealings?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good letter, but as these are solicitors maybe something short and sweet would be in order.

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Your Ref : xxxxx

 

Your Client : XXXX

 

I refer to your letter of xx/xx/2007, which was received today.

 

Frankly, I am surprised of the need to remind a firm of solicitors about the terms and conditions surrounding my Consumer Credit Agreement request (Consumer Credit Act, 1974); received by XX DCA XX on xx/xx. I can only assume therefore that they failed to inform you.

 

Should your client now persist with threats of legal action as stated in your letter, I will welcome the opportunity for a judge to look at several offences committed by XXX DCA XX under The Consumer Credit Act, 1974, as well as your client’s non-compliance with and total disregard for the law on this occasion.

 

Yours faithfully,

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/Madam

Your Ref;

I do not acknowledge any debt to you or your client.

 

Please be advised that I have contacted your client directly and requested further information under the legislation contained within s.78(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (S.77 (1) for fixed sum credit). Please note this was requested on 21 August 2006, and as I have received no response from your client this debt is now unenforceable. Any legal action will be vigourously defended on this basis.

 

o this end I would like you to note that I will not enter into any further communications with your company on this matter, unless and until my request is actioned.

 

 

 

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Gizmo, a lot shorter than my response. Should I add anything else?

 

Regards

 

Monty

 

Curlyben said:
Good letter, but as these are solicitors maybe something short and sweet would be in order.

 

Thanks Ben

 

??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Less is more:

 

IMPORTANT - YOU SHOULD READ THIS CAREFULLY

 

Your client has ignored my lawful request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and subsequent SI. I formally advise you that since your client has failed to comply with the terms of the Consumer Credit Act then as from dd-mmm-yyyy your client is in default on this alleged agreement.

This default means that the alleged agreement from this date is totally unenforceable. Your client may not apply any charges, cannot issue defaults, cannot sell nor assign the alleged debt nor cannot invoke any clause within the alleged agreement. Further, if your client thought that consent has been provided to share my data with any third party, then that is not proven. In any event as principled party under the Data Protection Act I formally withdraw that permission. Any attempt to share my data will be unlawful and will be dealt with in court. In addition you are instructed to remove all reference to my personal data from all records held by any third parties.

Finally, I will be seeking full restitution of all payments made with interest, since it is my belief that this alleged agreement was unenforceable from commencement. Your client had a duty of care to comply exactly to the Act and has failed to do so.

This default may be discharged only by production of a true copy of the alleged agreement and in full accordance of form and content and compliance with the Act.

You, therefore are unable to procede to court and I strongly suggest that you advise your client to comply.

 

ok so it isnt brief..... but you need to really make the point that THEY are in Default under the terms of the Act, and.... what is the consequence....

 

Z

  • Haha 2

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you asked me to look in, but Gizmo has already given you the best advice possible.

 

Do what he says:)

  • Haha 1

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit, I would be looking for a plan b at this stage... penalty charges, etc. My experience on the site is that it is extremly rare for creditors to fail to find a credit agreement after early 2004. Almost every bank got their act together then.

 

it's quite likely IMHO they have the agreement... they just haven't bothered looking for it yet.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit, I would be looking for a plan b at this stage... penalty charges, etc. My experience on the site is that it is extremly rare for creditors to fail to find a credit agreement after early 2004. Almost every bank got their act together then.

 

it's quite likely IMHO they have the agreement... they just haven't bothered looking for it yet.

 

Dear Tom

Amex have only provided an application for one account and a set of Terms and Conditions for the second.

 

Brachers have added over £3,000 in collection costs for both accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Tom

Amex have only provided an application for one account and a set of Terms and Conditions for the second.

 

Brachers have added over £3,000 in collection costs for both accounts.

 

That sounds promising:)

 

What about "She Who Must Be Obeyed" - well, you are a mod lol:D

 

What about Madam Gizmo?

 

Hey, no one said i was original, LOL.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brachers have added over £3,000 in collection costs for both accounts.

 

The OFT guidelines on debt collection spring to mind right about now!!! LOL!!

 

3 Grand in collection costs?!!! Who are they trying to kid...??!!?! Where've they been trying to enforce collection from? Bermuda... Then the Seychelles... Then Monte Carlo.... And maybe the South of France..!!! rolleye0018.gif

 

Take a read of the Debt Collection Guidance!

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

I've not laughed like that since... erm.. Friday!! LOL!!

 

Good luck with it!

Regards, Dave.

 

cag-end-sig.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave, I agree with you that they are taking the Pi**. I have a letter ready to go and I have already fired off an e-mail to TS. I am leaving it until Weds, they did give me a week in their threat-o-gram....how kind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Tom has a good point - should I serve them with an N1 for now £4 K of charges and require them to produce the credit agreements? They are 12 + 38 days gone and just sent a set of T&C's for one account and an application for the second.

 

Any thoughts or should I just wait for their response?

 

If I were you, I wouldn't take them to court - the burden of proof is on the claimant. I would start their formal complaint procedure, complain to the OFT, trading standards and all the other usual suspects.

 

Personally, I would just wait, 'cause either they'll have to send it back, or sue you.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

-------------UPDATE--------------

 

Had pay up or else letter from Brachers, plus they sent me an income and expenditure form to complete (nice try).

 

Sent them a reminder that their Client had failed to conform to my S78 CCA request, accounts were in default and that I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THIS DEBT. Reminded them that the alleged debt in unenforceable under the 1974 Consumer Credit Act. Made them an offer to settle but they want £11 K (most of this are charges).

 

I also requested all information that they hold on me (SAR) under S7 of the 1998 Date Protection Act. Sent £10 + RM Special Delivery.

 

Received a response telling me that they are not a data controller so do not have to comply with Data Protection Act, suggest I contact Amex, sent my £10 cheque back.

 

Now are Brachers acting as a Solicitor or a debt collection agency? - see their web site at: http://www.brachers.co.uk/commercial...debt-recovery/

 

Are they processing my data or not?

 

So far for 2 Amex credit cards:

 

- Amex sent 1 application for one card and a set of T&C's for the second

- SAR complied with by Amex back in June 07

- RMAI Resolve/NCO did not comply with SAR or CCA request

- Brachers are now acting, said they would supply the CCA's - have not

- Lots of threats and offers to settle, added £3.5 K "collection charges" want £11 K to settle.

- I require removal of default notices and now removal of balance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...