Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon all, popping in, Romulus, I am sorry I did nto get back to you about your agreements yesterday...I actually fell asleep at stupid o clock going over them ...but need to ask - you said you and your partner were self employed, is that officially self employed? If so the PPI on one agreement is missold. I can't see anything really out of place on them but had trouble getting the figures to add up? Will have to try again!

 

Why is it you have to phone them today?

 

To all regarding the secured loans...dig deep. If you find anything amiss on their submitted paperwork that has cost you anything then it is a breach of section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006, complain bitterly to the registry as they are meant to have checks (sigh)

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

its a hell of a lot of bedtime reading blondbomb but well worth it.

 

Thanks for all the advice...I have actually been following this post avidly, especially over the last few days (sending me dizzy, is an understatement).

 

I did actually ask the member of staff when I went into sign for the loan, if interest was payable on the acceptance fee and was told it wasn't and it was shown seperately on my agreement to look as if it wasn't. It was only when I received my statment of price, that showed interest was definitely added.

 

I have also noticed that Prudent's agreement is exactly the same as mine, however, he/she has been told by Welcome that interest is NOT charged on the acceptance fee.

 

Seems strange that we are both told different things!!

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

also i asked them not to make any phone calls,stated that all corespondence should now be in righting,reply to that was that they have removed my mobile number and will only call after 3pm,if i asked them not to phone where do i stand now.

 

how can they remove your number and still call? have you put it in writing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If You Have Requested In Writing All Telephone Numbers Be Removed And All Correspondents Be In Writing,

Welcome Can Foxtrot Oscar

 

If They Phone Tell Them You Will Be Reporting Them To Othello,

Trading Standards And The Oft

 

Tell Them The Call Is Being Recorded

 

So They Still Think The Law Does Not Apply To Them

Link to post
Share on other sites

My branch must have missed that training session! First loan signed off trade with independent witness, 7 day cooling off period only. Second loan (rewrite to 'reduce payments' ahem :roll:) signed on trade, no cooling off period as a matter of 'urgency' to stop court action and repossession (oh how naive i was, oh my) said I didn't need independent witness again as loan was rewrite and they would complete and send docs....oh and then they forged the original witness signature and details from first loan...hmmmm, I queried, they said it was a staff training issue...and again I reiterate, they missed that training session, or did they?

 

Gloucs87 I appreciate that you are young and had a terrible time and you are angry, but maybe refrain from mentioning death certificates and possible causes of suicide. I personally found it upsetting, for you if you feel that to be true and for anyone on this forum who may or may not have had experience of the depths of despair that issues like this caused by companies like welcome can cause. I think that if this truly is your experience at 21, having worked for them most of your young adult life, then they are more deplorable, you've obviously matured and have knowledge beyond your years and if you do help people here I hope this unburdens you. Simply present the facts, we all know they speak for themselves and Welcome document their facts well in my experience, but like Batfink they do not have wings of steel as they may think...

 

Thank you for your understanding - I will ensure I do everything I can to help on this forum and will ensure clear facts are presented. It is very difficult to remain emotionless when I know the dispair that has been caused by welcome. However, onwards and upwards, as I say I will do what I can. The above about secured loan is completely out of policy. If you read or can read the HR policy - it stipulates 14 day cooling off only when ROT is recieved back from the CPU ROT team. No documents to be signed off trade. I have once been told to get a rewrite signed a customers place of work at 8.15pm whilst they are on a cigarette break.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just putting another letter together, I had my statement of account sent and i have noticed that a payment i made to welcome using my debit card (that was sucessful bank statement as proof) on the 6th May 2008 was then debited to my welcome account on the 9th may 2008, so is this classed as theft on there behalf as they have wrongfully taken the money back......:mad:

 

 

PLEASE HELP,:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just putting another letter together, I had my statement of account sent and i have noticed that a payment i made to welcome using my debit card (that was sucessful bank statement as proof) on the 6th May 2008 was then debited to my welcome account on the 9th may 2008, so is this classed as theft on there behalf as they have wrongfully taken the money back......:mad:

 

 

PLEASE HELP,:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

 

Sorry i meant wrongfully deducted the money, which as far as i can see means that my balance has been wrong by 255.30 since 9th may 2008.:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Darwin

 

Hats Off To Andie On That One

 

She Was The First To Come Out With Spy

 

She Was Spotted Quite Early , But As Usual We Gave Enough Rope To Hang Herself

 

Like I Said

 

Mr P

 

Must Try Harder

 

Assumptions are never correct. Again, please may i reiterate, I am not a "spy".

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, unfortunatley I rec'vd a letter lastnight adv that I owe Welcome money and that I have to pay or be sent direct to the lewis group, I have spent most of lastnight and this morning checking if they are allowed to do so... apologies. Also in ref to the handbook - I have an employees handbook and not the HR one which is the rules and regs etc of what wfs are allowed to do. I will not be able to get a copy of this. I apologise.

 

forgive me but HR booklet would be about what welcome can do to your ect that is what Human Resources are all about the people that work for their company. Employee booklet would be what you as an employee can do surely??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assumptions are never correct. Again, please may i reiterate, I am not a "spy".

 

Ok forgive me if you think i'm being disrespectful - I'm not meaning to be but so far we have not seen the proof you said you had.

 

So forgive the suspicions - unfortunately they will continue until we see what you said you had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...