Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with lolerz.  They are simply trying to scare you. Anyway, it's your case, you get to decide how to proceed with it.  If you want to drop it, you can drop it when you want.  Their silly deadline of 8 May is neither here nor there. If you did drop the case they would be stuck with their own costs.  Tough.  That's how it works at small claims. However, indirectly there is a point to consider.  We all know how problematic this has been for your mum to handle.  So far it's only cost you £35.  Is she prepared to go to court and argue her case, or would it be better to drop the matter and take the hit on the £35?   
    • interesting that the mobs which attacked the peaceful protestors on the campus sites seem to have been mostly identified as non student and 'counter protestors' although some are being labelled as pro Israel, and I'm sure some are - but many appear to be just right wing hate mongers playing the situation as we far to often see. I have no sympathy with ANY of the protestors who are behaving like Trump insurrectionists whatever they claim their aims to be.   "The pro-Palestinian side, including Jews opposed to Israeli actions in Gaza, say they are being unfairly branded as antisemitic for criticizing Israel's government and expressing support for human rights." - Reuters  
    • running scared and begging you to stop. Of course, they won't admit that.
    • Hey guys,   Have an update with regards this SAR claim.   Mum received this letter dated 24th of April on the 2nd of May....  bit cheeky giving her only a few days to submit to their fear tactics!! Also, nothing has been received with regards to the lost case against parkingeye hmm maybe due to their delays??   Hope all are well!!   Kind regards,   Screenshot_20240502_185546_WhatsApp.pdf
    • Similar to what you've said here, just get drafting up based on what's already been sent. The mentions of the CRA2015 will be key. post your draft up here and we can help tweak.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hi mojo just joined today thought it wud be fun cant believe the stupid naivety of some folk tho. and i like u :oops:

 

 

 

Likewise tigga. im just going to keep putting in my comments as people are getting wound up so surely they must be taking in some of what im saying......its for a good cause anyway....ours

Link to post
Share on other sites

This Gets Better

So They Have Cut Gap Out Of The Market And Doing It Them Selves

 

Ill Do Some Checking To See If They Are Regulated To Deal With That Sort Of Insurance

 

Do You Have The T&c For This Shortfall

 

Post Up, Very Interested

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not So Sure

 

My Head Hurts, Been A Long Day

 

Why Are You Paying On The Full Balance

 

The 995 Needs To Be Deducted

But They Have And Put It Back On Again

 

Ill Look Again When Ive Had Some Sleep

 

Ill Say It Fraud

 

 

Thanx for looking, cant really miss it can you. The deposit was one of my questions. Dont want to make your head hurt anymore be glad of your and any other thoughts on this another time. Thanx again

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...