Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The "grief tech" firms helping users create talking avatars of their dead relatives.View the full article
    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO/Turnbull/Rutherfords Claimform - Citi Credit Card DEbt


popeye1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5953 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sent cca/sar to hfo and

claim acknowledgment form, on 6/8/07.

 

cca/sar arrived next day but cannot locate claim to court,

mondays last day all registered.

 

will the court accept this ihave the royalmail red sign for ticket

 

got statements from original creditors ,no other paperwork, and they show, dept sale receipt xxxx 27/06/06 then payment by me 27/06/06 and 29/06/067 also £10 off the bill whitch was for the SAR ON THE 01/05/07.

On the court claim form dca bought he account on the31 /5/06.they [OR]still took payments off me after this date ,is that right,

 

ive ust thought the statements go till july 07 with afigure just over the limit allowed ,can this account still be open their are no charges [interest etc] showing over from july 06

 

if account purchased by DCA in 31/05/06 on the claim form, statements show dept sale receipt27/06/06 but took payment from me 29/06/06 and £10 in1/05/ 07 .DCA purchased the account and rights can they both have a claim or is this a misstake and good for me ,any body please i would wellcome your comments.

 

wheir is the password on the claim form in case ineed to aswer that way please,,,

 

court received acknowledgment form. now to prepair defence, help please

 

no paperwork [cca/sar] from dca all sent 6/8/7 so they have 7 days .Last day to submit defence 28/8/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, no need to prepare a defence yet... you haven't got any of the info; if they don't send it to you on time, we'll submit a placeholder.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks for that, do not know what a placeholder is, but will read other threads anyway, can only learn from them.

 

Basically, a defence that says they have provided no proof of the debt, and that the debt is unenforceable due to various provisions of the consumer credit act.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is based on a rory32 effort. I must admit, it is a bit of a relief not dealing with a cabot rights vs duties argument... that one always generates lots of paper:)

 

 

 

 

1.I object that the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to or any default notices issued or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant’s claim.

 

b) they do not disclose a right of action by the claimant, and fail to explain the contractual relationship between myself and the claimant; if the claimant is not the creditor of this alleged agreement, and is merly acting as an agent or legal representative of another firm, then I respectfully submit that under s141 of the consumer credit act 1974 the court does not have jurisdiction to hear the case unless brought by the creditor in its own name.

 

c) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

d) A copy if the purported document or contract of assignment that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form

 

e) A copy of the purported notice of assignment that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form, and neither has a copy of any proof of postage or receipt.

 

f) A copy of the purported default notice that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form, and neither has a copy of any proof of postage or receipt.

 

 

g) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

 

 

2. Since the particulars of claim do not state what type of regulated agreement the claimant alleges I have allegedly defaulted on, on 7 August 07, I submitted to the claimant a formal demand under section 77 or 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (“The Act”), requiring the claimant to provide true copies of the alleged regulated credit agreement, along with true copies of all documents referred to therein. The Claimant has failed to furnish the requested documentation on time, or at all. Therefore until such time as the claimant complies any alleged debt would be unenforceable by virtue of section 77 or 78 of the Act.

 

3. Further to paragraph 2, on 7 August 07 I submitted to the claimant a written request for a copy of the alleged credit agreement, as well as other important information in respect of the account referred to by the claimant, such as details of any fees and collection charges levied to the account. The requested information is essential to enable me to file a full defence and counterclaim. The claimant was advised that as this matter was subject to legal proceedings, the information requested must be furnished within 14 days. The claimant has as yet failed to comply, and I respectfully request the permission of the court to amend this statement of case if this information is forthcoming.

 

4. For the avoidance of doubt, to date the claimant has failed to produce a credit agreement to substantiate their claim that monies are owed under a regulated credit agreement, and therefore I do not acknowledge any alleged indebtedness to the claimant, and all allegations contained within the Particulars of Claim are denied.

 

 

5. In view of the matters pleaded above, I respectfully request that the court gives consideration to whether the claimant’s statement of case should be struck out as disclosing no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim, and/or that it fails to comply with CPR Part 16.

 

6.Alternatively, I respectfully request a stay in proceedings until such time as the claimant complies with the requests outlined in paragraph's 2 and 3 above or until the court orders its compliance with the same. I will then be in a position to file a fully particularised defence and counterclaim and will seek the courts permission to amend my statement of case accordingly.

 

I, the Defendant, believe all facts stated to be true

 

Signed: Dated:

 

You need to attach a copy of your letters to them.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that tomterm8, my claim defence form n9b willhave to be faxed because it has to go to wandsworth court ,thats ok ,i have access to a fax machine.Do i start writing the defence on the form and if not enough space carriy on a seperate pieace of paper.i donot think i have any counterclaim ,just getting through this will be good enough , thanks.

 

It does say in the Response Pack that i can use moneyclaim but when i phoned the for the password [i think i went through to northampton somewhere] they told me it was not that type of claim form ,no password

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does say in the Response Pack that i can use moneyclaim but when i phoned the for the password [i think i went through to northampton somewhere] they told me it was not that type of claim form ,no password

 

 

If you go to http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n9b_0406.pdf you will find an electronic copy of the claims form.

 

It doesn't have enough room, so continue on a seperate page.

 

Remember to print out a copy for your own records.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, i,ve [ with alot of help from a friend] filled in the defence forms, 2pages from the internet address above plus extra sheet with what i could not get on the forms.also copies of the letters i sent to climents solicitors to be faxed on the 24th if nothing changes ,ok

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. you don't need to do anything now, until the court gets in touch with you. probably the letter will say that the case is stayed for 28 days for the claimant to decide if they want to continue, and transfer it to your local court.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

it's 12 working days after receipt of the letter; criminal default occurs a month latter. All you are interested in, really, is the 12 days.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats good news,they are wellover and 30 days now. the new rules about agreements come into force april 07 [ i think] if you have made payments on aolder account after this [07 april ] .on a account about 4 years old do the new rules apply, many thanks tomterm8 for your help

 

As i have a court case coming up, would it not be in my favour to report the dca for not complying to my cca request, to T/S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardon? No, they don't. the rules on credit agreement format apply if the agreement was made before april 07. Paying money after april 07 DOESN'T affect anything very much.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I had aletter from the first court which said the claim has been transferred to a court closer to me for allocation , on receipt the file will be referred to a procedural judge who will allocate the claim to track and give case management directions.details of the judges decision will be sent to me in a notice of allocation,. i recieved that letter in oct but waited for this letter before writing on the thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...