Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

FAO Lateralus/Freakyleaky/Castlebest - Question but not HSBC related


Mandy27
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Probably should post this in the Abbey forum but you guys have been brilliant getting me through my claim with HSBC.

 

I'm actually asking on behalf of my sister. She is coming round to mine this pm to go through her claim. She has over £5,000 of charges to claim back from Abbey. She's done the prelim and LBA and is now stuck, she says she's not getting much help from the Abbey forum so I thought I'd see if you guys can help.

 

Basically, she doesn't understand the claim process now for over £5,000 and I have to say nor do I. Does she need to file a claim on MCOL or direct through the courts. I think I'm right in assuming this isn't a small claim because its more than £5,000.

 

Can someone just confirm the process so I can talk her through it when she comes round?

 

Many thanks in advance

 

Mandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Small claims are for under 5000 so you will have to do it direct with the court. Call your local court and ask which forms you need to fill in. I think you can use the n1 form but just double check. If you can use the n1 then you can downloadit from this site. There are new particulars of claim to use for most banks now but just shout when you are ready to fill it in and we will point you in the right direction.

The court will also be able to tell you how much the fee's are!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think, unless your sisters claim is a lot over £5000 it will still be allocated to the small claims track because the pionts of law will be the same as all the other bank charges claims.

 

You could still file with MCOL although the thinking now is dont use MCOL anyway because the limited space provided for the particulars is too small, have a look at the new POC's posted on the Abbey fourum and use an N1 claim form and send it by post or take it by hand to your local court.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, Mandy27's sister here, thank you for your help! I have to say and I don't like to more help than I have got from the abbey part of the site! I posted there yesterday with a question, just wondered if whilst I am getting my N1 and butt in gear (head round it all, no where near as clever as my sister I'm afraid, she got all the brain cells!) I sent the following letter:

 

Dear *************

 

 

Further to my letter dated 17th July 1007, I would like to offer you one final opportunity to settle this matter before I proceed with legal action to claim the remainder of the charges levied from my account unlawfully.

 

You have already credited my account with £360, my claim is for £5024 (please see attached spreadsheet, which also shows how much I will be seeking in court with the additional 8%) plus £250.00 court fees.

 

I am in the process of completing my N1 form for the courts and upon reading the first item on the "Notes for claimant":


  • "You must think about whether alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a better way to reach an agreement before going to court. The leaflet ‘Making a claim? – Some questions to ask yourself’ explains morea bout ADR and how you can attempt to settle your claim"

It is this that has prompted me to attempt a final resolution with you which would be in both our interests, out of court. I would be willing to accept an out of court settlement of £4664.00 aswell as the £360 already credited by yourselves to my account totalling the amount I am seeking of £5024. This will save yourselves the additional costs of 8% interest and £250 court fees.

 

Failure to comply with this request will result in legal action against you for full recovery, as detailed in my Letter Before Action.

 

If you do not accept my conditions for acceptance, or you do not respond within 10 days, the money transfered to my account should not be viewed as my acceptance and I hereby authorise you to remove this sum accordingly.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, mandy's sister pooh, i guess anything is worth a shot - but i don't see it happening now with the oft test case - they are using it to get out of being confronted - they will just send you a letter back (i'd think) stating that they aren't now dealing with bank charges claiming at all and won't do until the oft case is heard, thank you for your patience, your letter is very important to us, have a nice day!

 

but as i say - it's worth a try - good luck, pb, let us know how you get on.

 

you might like to read this to see why you should go ahead and claim if your letter doesn't work: OFT Test claim: What this means for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I think you are right, to be honest I think it is just my subconcious trying to avoid the court bit, I am just finding it hard to understand and get my head round and worried it will get to court and I am not clever enough to defend against a legal department of a big bank.

 

I just need to get the N1 in, pay my court fee and then at least its done, I have got another claim I am doing for my OH with Natwest so need to do the same as they are at the same stage.

 

One question on the N1 form that isn't covered on the POC you posted (very kindly) the "Value" you put in, especially as I assume the 8% interest continues to go up day by day until an offer or judgement is made? It has a bit for Claimant details first, then Defendant details, the Brief details of the claim and the "value". My claim is £5024 (although the bank has already paid £360 into my account, plus £250 court fees and 8%, how and what do I put in that section?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, i'd say Enter the total of your claim, charges and interest and then there's a sentence in the N1 that says Interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of wrongful debit to date in the sum of £xxx.xx, and at the daily rate of xx.until judgment or sooner payment.

 

 

and you figure the daily rate as your charges (not interest or court fee) x 0.00022 pence per day - so say your charges alone are 5k - the daily interest would be £1.10 per day -

so value would be xxxx.xx plus xxp daily rate until the resolution of the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...