Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

barclays acknowledge


princess roxy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I recently filed court action against barclays,which they have now acknowledged. i sent with my letters to them a list of all the charges i wish to reclaim, should i have also sent a list of charges to the court when i started proceedings????? barclays have until midnight 15th june to file a defence,do you think that they will do this??? please keep an eye on this thread as i know i will need your help if they do,starting to get a little nervy now .thanks Roxy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

barclays have until midnight 15th june to file a defence,do you think that they will do this???

 

Is this date correct. ????

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to be nervy Roxy. You can do a lot worse than follow saint.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roxy

 

Just a word of warning. Don't be tempted to go for judgement if defence is not filed by 15th. MCOL does not update immediately. Best to leave it a few days, and ask on here before you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roxy

 

Doubt very much if you will have to go to court as B's are settling straight forward cases about 2 weeks before court. Having said that you must be prepared and submitted anything the court asks for. It would be folly to have gone this far then take your finger off the pulse. When you get a court date start negotiating with the litigation team.

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

Iwas told by a guy from MCOL that the last date for Barclays to put in a defence , was this weekend but i could file for judgement after midnight tonight , could they still file a defence AFTER i have filed for judgement, ??? andhas anyone ever heard of Barclays NOTfiling a defence ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roxy

 

MCOL is notoriously slow at updating.They seem to allow Barclays a couple of extra days to file and they no doubt will. Leave it till about Wednesday then contact MCOL before filing for judgement. If you go for it now Barclays will get a stay which could set you back months.

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Barclays filed a defence at the last minute ,was expected . so can someone tell me what happens now ,and do i need to do anything ,like contact court ,get papers ready etc or do i just wait for them to get intouch with me ??? thank you Rox

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to do anything at mo roxy. You should recieve a copy of Barclays defence together with a notice of transfer.

 

When you get the defence please post up the first 3 points as i guess that they will ask for SOC

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Trucker ,will do . how long before i receive barclays defence or notice of transfer,is it a few weeks wait? and when would a court date be ,are we looking at weeks or months. sorry to go on a bit trying to get some kind of timescale for the rest of the case. will keep you informed of any info from barclays or court. thanks Trucker keep watching . Rox ps what is SOC ? I may need a copy of T&Cs how can i get these

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roxy

 

You should get B's defence any day now. Transfer usually takes a few weeks and the court date really depends on your local court, their workload etc. SOC = Schedule of Charges. Have a look at this thread for T&C's

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/101412-document-library-work-progress.html#post956704

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi have received defence from Barclays, first three points read ; 1)the particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of the precise charges alleged to have been unlawful,or the dates there of . to the extent it is alleged that the claimant incured bank charges on the claimants account for unauthorised borrowing,(whether unpaid fees for returned cheques, paid referral fees or any other such fees), the defendant puts the claimant to strict proof of each charge and the date there of. 2) the particulars of claim are summary in nature ,Accordingly,this defence is summary in nature and the defendant reserves the right to amend this statement of case in due course 3) the defendant is entitled to charge the claimant for unauthorised borrowing by reason of its standard terms and conditions. the claimant accepted the same when the account wasopened,including the following terms and conds a) the right to charge a paid referral fee where the defendantpays an amount which causes the account to become overdrawn £30 per item. b)the def right to charge an admin fee if any cheque,standing order or dd cannot be paid because of insufficient funds in the account, £30 per item c) the defendant s entitlement if the claimant becomes overdrawn without an overdraft limit,to charge interest at the authorised borrowing rate on the excess balance. what do i have to do now??? the case has been transfered to my home town , do i call them to see if a date has been set????? it says on the court paper that the filing of a aq be dispensed with in this case unless the judge orders otherwise AND any party affected by this order may under rule 3.3(5) apply to have it set aside ,varied or stayed. such party must apply under rule 23.3 within 14 days of service of order. ....... looking rather complicated havnt a clue what it all means ,very official can anyone help thanks Roxy

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are saying that you havent provided them with a schedule of charges (yes we know they have been sent many times already ) so you need to send a copy of your SOC's to Barclays Litigation and to the court with covering letters asking for them to be included in your file :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...