Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft have sent me a letter about a debt with british gas


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

At the moment it all bluff and bluster. This type of letter is colloquially called a threat-o-gram.

 

You have two courses of action -

1. Just ignore it

2. Write back and say you have to have proof of the alleged debt before you will correspond with them further. Otherwise they should write to you advising the matter is closed.

 

If you need help with the letter there are various examples in other threads which you can find easily enough. Someone might even be able to post one here.

 

They can of course take you to court but to have the slightest chance of success they must be able to prove the alleged debt. I think court action is some way off yet and we can deal with that if and when it happens.

 

 

One small though : did you change suppliers at some point? This takes 28 days to be actioned (whoever the supplier is). Maybe it is this period that they are billing for? Bear in mind that when you take over a property (lease or purchase) the existing supplier is deemed to be still in place. You can only give notice when take over the property so even if you want to move to another supplier you still have to go with the existing supplier for the 28 day period following your giving notice. BTDT

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou. I have wrote yet another letter to them, which they will prbably ignore again. I will contact BG. does anyone have an address for them?

I did change suppliers but it didnt involve British Gas, i didnt even get a bill from the time they are saying i had them supplying, i got one a year later.

I really cant be doing with the stress of court if it happens, so hopefully i can sort this out with letters

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all stop worrying about any court action. If (and that's a big if) it ever happens (a) it is not nearly as intimidating as you might imagine, and (b) there are many helpful people on here who can help you out.

 

BG's address (from their website) is

BRITISH GAS

PO BOX 3055

EASTBOURNE

BN21 9FE

 

Secondly, put your query in writing and state the bit about possibly wrong meters. BG are pretty grudging about investigations but do eventually do them. Make sure you keep every document and keep a log (date, time, person's name) of all phone calls including a summary of the conversation.

 

This might take a bit of to-ing and fro-ing but you should get there in the end. Be prepared : they might even be able to justify their bill.

 

 

Thirdly, you state that they didn't supply your gas. Who did?

[Actually they don't physically supply your gas - somebody like Transco does. BG just bills you for it].

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice, much appreciated. southern electric supplied my bills but i throw them out every 6month. ive sent the letter recorded today, if they keep harrasing me i will send one to british gas, hopefiully the letter i sent will do the trick, i'll keep this updated

thans again everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi all

Im having problems with british gas. to cut a long story short, i received a bill last year claiming i owed money from march to june 2006. i did not have BG as my supplier and had not recieved a bill during this time yet 2 years later they send me a bill!!. I rang them, got the run around and then told someone would look into it and get back to me. 3 month later i got a letter from a DCA, i explained the above and heard nothing. 3 DCA have now tried to get me to pay the non existat debt. It is now with robinson way, i explained again and i said if i did agree for BG to supply me then they would have a signed agreement by me. The reply came today, (a shabby photocopied letter) saying there is no signed agreement for utilities as per the utilities at 2000. That is all it says, no Dear ...... etc. just that aout the agreement.

Wht can i do now, i know i was never with BG as i had major problems with them about 12 year ago (they sent me a 3k bill for 6 months in a 1 bedroom flat) and i vowed i would never use them again, so i know i would never if signed up with them, let alone for only 3 months.

where do i stand and what will happen if i just ignore them, this has been going on for over a year!

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

also iwould write back to the companies and bg and state it is illegal to demand money by menace and without proof any further contact from you will result in legal action

regards dk

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks

I dont have any bills, i only keep things for 6 months then shred them, they didnt contact me till a year after they claim they supplied me so i never keep things that long.

Ive wrote to them both so many times but they still keep sending letters, it just seems BG pass it from one DCA to another

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to British gas using their complaints procedure setting out the problem in full. Ignore the DCA entirely as British gas should never have involved them while the account (which you claim does not exist) is in dispute etc - see the OFT guidelines about debt collectors. You will find these in the stickies under the debt collection board.

 

From now on get everything in writing and do not phone them. Keep all documents and letters carefully.

 

British gas are a mess. Look at British Gas to sue Accenture over customer service hell | This is Money

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Dear Forum

 

Hi, have just found this site as a result of a letter I received and I hope that someone may be able to advise me.

 

Sometime last year, I received a letter addressed to 'The Occupier', which in retrospect came from PDCS asking me to contact them. Like most things addressed as such, it was binned. Today however, I have received another from them, this time addressed in my name, asking me to ring them about an important matter.

 

Needless to say I have not, nor do I have any intention of doing so. Hence my online search for information about them and my discovery of this forum.

 

My question is: Is it advisable to just ignore such a vague letter (it did contain a 'case number', but no details at all)? To my knowledge, I have no debts outstanding - apart from a mortgage.

 

Thank you in anticipation of a reply.

 

FISHBUS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

I posted the following on another thread that I now cannot find. Would it be because the previous posts were made a year ago?

 

Anyway, I hope you don't mind me posting it again here - be gentle, I'm a newbie. :)

 

 

Dear Forum

 

Hi, have just found this site as a result of a letter I received and I hope that someone may be able to advise me.

 

Sometime last year, I received a letter addressed to 'The Occupier', which in retrospect came from PDCS asking me to contact them. Like most things addressed as such, it was binned. Today however, I have received another from them, this time addressed in my name, asking me to ring them about an important matter.

 

Needless to say I have not, nor do I have any intention of doing so. Hence my online search for information about them and my discovery of this forum.

 

My question is: Is it advisable to just ignore such a vague letter (it did contain a 'case number', but no details at all)? To my knowledge, I have no debts outstanding - apart from a mortgage.

 

Thank you in anticipation of a reply.

 

FISHBUS

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have only made two posts, the other post, earlier today in the debt forum. You mentioned a post made 12 months ago, could this have been made under a different username?

Your post in the Debt Forum is here.....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/134807-help-past-due-credit.html#post2518294

 

The most likely identity of PDCS is....

 

Company Name:PDCS LIMITED

Company Type:

Limited Company

 

Company No:

04500018

 

Company Address:

PDCS LIMITED

C/O McKellens 11 Riverview

The Embankment Business Park

Vale Road

STOCKPORT

SK4 3GN

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not known at Companies House.

A check with Creditgate.com gives the following info.....

 

Available Reports Details

 

 

Company Name:

 

PDCS LIMITED

Company No: 04500018

Registered Office:Incorporated: 31/07/2002C/O MCKELLENS, 11 RIVERVIEW

THE EMBANKMENT BUSINESS PARK

VALE ROAD, HEATON MERSEY,

STOCKPORT, CHESHIRE

SK4 3GN

 

Company Type: Private Limited

Legal Status: Company Dissolved

Report Status: Full DissolvedAccounts Type: UnknownLatest Accounts to: 31/07/2005Latest Return to: 31/07/2006

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Ah, I think I didn't explain myself very well. The previous posts I mentioned were made by other members approx. a year ago, and I was wondering if I had added my post to a defunct thread. Thanks for pointing out that it still exists and my apologies for any confusion.

 

FISHBUS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two threads merged.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...