Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Whyisitthis
      B&Q I’m now a shoplifter?

      By Whyisitthis · Posted

      Appreciate the time that has gone into replying. I have read so much about this tonight that hopefully I can be a step ahead.  If I gain a reply from the head office I shall let you guys know. 
    • dx100uk
      80k debt

      By dx100uk · Posted

      yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • dx100uk
      B&Q I’m now a shoplifter?

      By dx100uk · Posted

      just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • dx100uk
      Backdoor Link CCJ - old Barclaycard debt - Default Judgment set a side - hearing in 2 days - Witness Statement help urgent!

      By dx100uk · Posted

      4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • dubai 5 0
      Dubai debt transferred from IDR to J&P

      By dubai 5 0 · Posted

      Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All
Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Robinson, Way - Unbelievable!!! **WON**

majorclanger100

By majorclanger100
in Legal Successes

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

majorclanger100

majorclanger100

Posted
Posted

Don't normally speak to any DCAs but Robberson Way caught us on the hop yesterday whilst we were waiting for a call from a doctor about my very seriously ill mother-in-law.

 

They were ringing about a disputed debt, so shouldn't have been calling anyway - my wife gave them an impressive amount of verbal, explained the situation about the doctor, and then I took the call to have a go as well.

 

Majorclanger100: 'You shouldn't be calling us about this debt it is under dispute'

 

Robberson Way: 'We can ring you about it, as you need to cover our costs'

 

MC100: 'Really? So which statute specifies that then? You are aware that you are in breach of the OFT guidelines? I am getting off the phone now as we are waiting for a call from a doctor about my mother in law, who is extremely ill following a heart operation - this is just not important.'

 

RW: 'We need to sort this out, as it
is
very important'

 

MC100: 'Important to you perhaps, but not to us. I am ending this call'

 

RW: 'Stay on the phone Mr Majorclanger, you signed the T & Cs of this contract and now you must face the consequences. This is of vital importance'

 

MC100: 'Goodbyeee' (plus a teeny bit of swearing)

 

Proof that DCAs don't inhabit the same world as the rest of us.....

WOOLWICH -S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 03/03/07 :cool:

LBA sent for non-compliance with Data Protection Act 28/04/07 :mad:

 

ABBEY - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 03/03/07 8)

Link to post
Share on other sites
djdave

djdave

Posted
Posted

I hope you recorded it. "Enough rope" and "hang" leap to mind.

 

All the best to your mother-in-law, by the way :)

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Drexl Spivey

Drexl Spivey

Posted
Posted

I would have just put the phone down on them in a situation like that , they are not important enough to be engaged on the phone with when awaiting an important call. They are not important enough when not awaiting one.

 

But it is disgusting behaviour , but it is an incentive for you next time to just hang up and leave the phone free for more important concerns. Those fools that are the callers from robinson way are nothing but **** you find on your shoe that you kick into the kerb , they are not worth wasting breath on to talk to . I do keep them talking sometimes to annoy them in the data protection loop , but if an important call is incoming.. no, they must be terminated immediately .

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
majorclanger100

majorclanger100

Posted
  • Author
Posted

LOL I love the idea of the effect an 'Acme Thunderer' would have - must one.

 

Instalment two of the Robberson Way saga:-

 

Mother-in-law has now left hospital and is pretty poorly as you can imagine. She also has a 'debt' which RW reckon they can collect on - but they've not complied with her CCA request (well over 42 days). Despite this they rang her, she explained that she's not in any fit state to deal with the situation and that she'd just come out of hospital - they said they'd call her every two days until she agreed payment. :mad:

 

We went ballistic - I've threatened them with everything from the OFT to the local paper and Watchdog. Not that they give a toss but it made us feel better! Although she hasn't received any calls from the buggers since..... :roll:

WOOLWICH -S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 03/03/07 :cool:

LBA sent for non-compliance with Data Protection Act 28/04/07 :mad:

 

ABBEY - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 03/03/07 8)

Link to post
Share on other sites
majorclanger100

majorclanger100

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Robberson Way have collapsed totally - we've received a very slimy apology letter (too late to prevent my complaint to the TS - shame ;) ) stating that 'our usual level of service failed on this occasion'. No it didn't - bullying frail old ladies is exactly their usual level of service. Anyway they've referred the account back to the original 'creditor'.

 

Good ending for my mother-in-law but how many other OAPs/vulnerable people are out there who are in the same situation and being treated like dirt, but don't know someone in the CAG who can fight on their behalf? :mad:

WOOLWICH -S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 03/03/07 :cool:

LBA sent for non-compliance with Data Protection Act 28/04/07 :mad:

 

ABBEY - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 03/03/07 8)

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...