Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have been in the motor trade for 35 years and have used hundreds of companies for a variety of repairs, only once have i had a major problem which i sorted out in County Court and won. I had a Vauxhall Insignia with an engine fault and advertised on 1st Choice car repairs site for a repair.  Jack, actually his alias Lee contacted us with a quote which we accepted. We transported the car to Unit 4/18 Burnt Mills Road North Benfleet SS129JX expecting its return within the promised 28 days. I have had every excuse you could possibly imagine, in the last 2 YEARS!! as to why the car is not repaired. Ecu faults, Ignition faults, Gearbox faults, Exhaust faults, Wiring chaffing faults, Communication faults, Cancer treatment delaying the repair, medical treatment in Turkey delaying the repair, Covid delaying the repair!! The man is a pathological liar and a fraud. He is now refusing to tell me where the car is and refusing me access to collect it. He is under investigation by trading standards dept Jasper Singh officer in the case but he just keeps getting away with it. Police say its a civil debt and not a criminal offence. 1st choice do not want to know, they refuse to do anything other than request the car be repaired directly by UK169 which is of course ignored I found recently all the posts on this site about Jack and his tactics but it was too late. To date i am £6200 out of pocket to this man and it appears the law is powerless to deal with dishonest rogues.
    • The missing parcel is Evri uk , it was going from Shropshire to Cornwall and has gone missing.   but it got me wondering as i also sent a parcel abroad the same day if that had gone missing where would i stand ...    
    • Another farce kicking everything into the long grass - as usual for these corporate and political criminals Post Office scandal: Police to deploy 80 detectives for criminal inquiry. Investigation will dig into potential perjury offences and perverting the course of justice by senior leaders and Fujitsu   Police have asked government for a special grant of at least £6.75m to fund the operation. Police will not seek charging decisions, that is send files of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service, until after the public inquiry into the Post Office scandal concludes, which is expected in autumn 2025.   It is expected the CPS will not reach charging decisions until 2026, and the wait for any criminal trials could be even longer.     Post Office scandal: Police to deploy 80 detectives for criminal inquiry | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Investigation will dig into potential perjury offences and perverting the course of justice by senior leaders and Fujitsu    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Clydesdale Bank refuse to refund Unlawful charges applied to my account


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After waiting over 110 days for the clydesdale bank to send me my bank statements and over 21 days for a reply after my letter advising them of the charges i wanted re-imbursed i received a letter stating the banks terms and conditions as reason for not refunding my charges.

The letter reads:

Re Charges Claim

 

I refer to your recent letter, regarding the charges applied to your account.

 

During this time, the relationship between you and the bank was governed by the banks standard terms and conditions. Yhose terms and conditions provided that:

 

(1) Free banking is available whilst your account remains in credit or within an agreed overdraft limit.

(2)You must obtain the banks agreement before overdrawing on your account.

(3) If the bank made payments from the account or paid cheques which were guaranteed by the associated cheque guarantee card when they were insufficient funds available, any overdraft created or any overdraft which exceeded an agreed overdraft limit would be unauthorised

(4) If you drew cheques or authorised or made payments without sufficient money available in your account, taking account of any overdraft limit and allowing for uncleared cheques, the bank might return the payments and make a charge for doing so.

(5) Charges and interest applicable to the account were published in the form of tariffs and up-to-date tariffs were available in branches and from time to time enclosed with bank statements.

(6) Where apppropriate, written details of overdraft charges, and debit interest inccured on the account during the previous charging period (i.e, the previous month) would be send to you at least fourteen days before the charges and interest were deducted from your account.

(7) If the account had an unauthorised overdraft, additional charges might be levied which would be debited to the account on the day on which the unauthorised overdraft was created.

(8)If the bank increased a charge for a basic account service, the bank would give you at least 30 day's notice.

 

I would note that the terms and conditions complied with all relevant requirements of the banking code.

 

As i am sure you will appreciate, you are responsible for the running of your account, and for ensuring that sufficient funds are in your account to meet the standing orders, direct debits and cheques which you have created or drawn on the account. As stated on the terms and conditions governing your account with the bank, you have been made aware that charges will be incurred if insufficient funds are in your account on the dates the payments you have instructed are debited. The charges applied to your account were applied in accordance with the terms and conditions, as a result of your operation of the account.

 

Further, the terms and conditions were fair having regard to the following matters:

 

(a) The cost to the bank of maintaining administrative systems relating to unauthorised overdrafts, unpaid cheques and direct debits and abuse of cheque and debit cards for the purpose of keeping the level of overdrawing under review and controlled as far as possible.

 

(b) The need to operate standard procedures and to set standard charges in order to avoid the substantial costs of individual assessement in relation to each particular case.

 

Taking all of the above into account and having regard to the information you have given, I regret to inform you that i am unable to refund the charges on your account.

 

If you have any additional information that you wish to provide please do not hesitate to contact us quoting the above reference.

 

Yours sincerely

Advice Quality Unit Charges Section

 

 

Well that's the letter.

 

I FEEL THE BANK IS MAKING THIS AS DIFFICULT AS POSSIBLE, WHAT DO I DO NOW ?

 

EDIT. Title edited to read "Unlawful charges"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi reded,

 

If this was their response to your prelim, send them the LBA and give them another 14 days to give you a positive response. If this was their response to your LBA, you've exhausted 'polite requests' and your only option is to start court action to recover the charges. Make sure you have a parachute account opened also.

 

Good luck :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Reded,

 

I'm at exactly the same stage as you and have not long ago received exactly the same templated response. This is simply to try and stop you from going further with the claim and it obviously works as some people see this and drop out of the chase. DON'T!! Keep going and claim what is yours.

 

I've sent them my 14 day letter before action and I'm completely prepared and ready to take it to court. In fact, I WANT to take it to court cos then I get my interest back as well!!!:cool:

 

I'll watch your thread and see how it develops.

____________________________________________

Yorkshire Bank account

21/3/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

3/4/07 YB standard reply - "we're on the case"

30/3/07 YB letter - "we're still on the case but we're really busy - boo hoo - can't do the 40 days but we're trying our best..."

1/5/07 LBA for Data Protection Act breach sent (41 days since S.A.R - (Subject Access Request))

15/5/07 Proceeding started at County Court for Data Protection Act breach (56 days since SAR)

30/5/07 YB filed acknowledgement of service to claim indicating intention to defend.

7/6/07 Statement pack 1 of 2 arrives containing £912 worth of charges - and that's going to be the lighter of the two packs!

 

Old Abbey National Bank account (93-99)

22/5/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

(6) Where apppropriate, written details of overdraft charges, and debit interest inccured on the account during the previous charging period (i.e, the previous month) would be send to you at least fourteen days before the charges and interest were deducted from your account.

 

What do you make of that statement?

It seems to read that even though your statement reads that the charges have been withdrawn they aren't (you have 14 days to sort things out?)

"I am more than prepared to repay any money I have borrowed, IF they are prepared to refund any money THEIR agreement doesnt allow them to charge me." Tamadus

 

Thanks couldnt put it better myself :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I read it, they're just saying that they informed you of their intention to charge thereby maintaining their side of the deal as per their terms and conditions. I don't think it makes one iota of difference to the overall challenge though (unless someone else can enlighten us further?)

____________________________________________

Yorkshire Bank account

21/3/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

3/4/07 YB standard reply - "we're on the case"

30/3/07 YB letter - "we're still on the case but we're really busy - boo hoo - can't do the 40 days but we're trying our best..."

1/5/07 LBA for Data Protection Act breach sent (41 days since S.A.R - (Subject Access Request))

15/5/07 Proceeding started at County Court for Data Protection Act breach (56 days since SAR)

30/5/07 YB filed acknowledgement of service to claim indicating intention to defend.

7/6/07 Statement pack 1 of 2 arrives containing £912 worth of charges - and that's going to be the lighter of the two packs!

 

Old Abbey National Bank account (93-99)

22/5/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

same stage for me with YB. Rang them up today and they said write in saying you're not happy and the Claims Investigation will review it - no timescales as they have a big backlog. My LBA is going tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(6) Where apppropriate, written details of overdraft charges, and debit interest inccured on the account during the previous charging period (i.e, the previous month) would be send to you at least fourteen days before the charges and interest were deducted from your account.

 

I believe this is the bank saying we are going to apply these charges to your account you have fourteen days to come to us if you disagree with them, if this happened to me now i would visit my branch and ask for these charges to be waived as i now know these charges to be unlawful, of course the bank will charge you £25 for sending out the letter to tell you these charges are going to be applied

p.s. what started me re-claiming bank charges was when i went over my overdraft limit the bank sent me a letter telling me they would be applying charges to my account, my pay went into my account, the bank took the charges, just before my pay was to go in the next month they applied charges for sending the letter sending me beyond my overdraft again and then they started to repeat the process. Taking the **** or just a coincidence that the charges for the letter were applied the day before my pay was to go into my account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...