Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry I have been confused by Statute Barred meaning. I thought with Statute Barred the debt cannot be chased 6 years after you have stopped paying.  Originally I set up a payment arrangement with all the companies around 2008 when things went horribly wrong. At that time the payment arrangement was with the original creditors.  I still have one of the original creditors who I pay each month (Cap1). I thought that if you make a payment arrangement you have to stick to that situation throughout. Also, MDR (Moorcroft) have been taking a monthly payment on behalf of M & S Bank for about 5 years. When I sent MDR a CCA request I got a copy of the original agreement sent to me directly by M & S Bank about 5 weeks after my CCA request. Sorry for my ignorance but would you suggest I stop paying all including Cap1 who are the original creditor? TIA
    • London1971 without divulging too much into his mental health he has issues regarding anything to do with government and so is it ok to fill the forms provided and what do I put on there  thanks  
    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My Bro Vs Capital one


indebtstudent
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So difficult not to just pop that tempting r into thier name.

 

Anyway the story so far, sent SAR then waiting a while (bigger case to deal w/ re Natwest), but Cap one got back on to my bro re debt collection agency and so I sent a Prelim. Received reply full of waffle very quickly, saying they would refund £88. The charges come to £200 so I don't think he should accept this.

 

In addition they say they now charge £12 to bring them in line with competitors. Yeah right!

 

At present the debt is a shady under £700, but the credit limit is £500. I plan to write back saying he will only accept thier offer as part payment and wil proceed to court after the second deadline. I might even be nice and point out that this will cost them more.

 

They said they will not budge on the default saying they have a duty to record info accurately etc. Well they've also go a duty to act within the law and if they won't budge then I guess we will just have to thrash it our in court won't me...

 

I feel no fear now I'm used to this guff from banks, just irritates me slightly that they still try it on. Idiots, thier money that will be wasted at the end of the day.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're actually ahead of shcedule but this means I can send the LBA out sooner surely :)

 

Thanks capital one u rule!

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Now the dilemma, everyday I don't claim the interest increases... Also they've refunded the £80 despite my letter saying part payment only...

 

Think I'll bang in a CCa request then file for court if they comply. I like making companies jump through hoops...

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Cap one have messed up...

 

They responded to a CCA request by saying they are not required to provide a copy of the default notice (not my understanding). In addition their proof of the agreement is just printed out and has no signitures on.

 

I'd just love it is they have overlooked something so significant.

 

They even said they can confirm the default notice was issued (if so where is it???). I think the word alledged is going to be used an awful lot not. Better go check the spelling first :)

 

Oh yes and (I really like this) though they claim to not be under any obligation to provide a copy they sent a template to show what the notice would look like. Hmmm, gee whizz, where to start?

 

At first glance it would appear that they have rather shot themselves in the foot and are bluffing. Comments/suggestions?

 

I'm not in a rush to reply as I believe the threat of any action can be nullified by the above revelation. They even refund four quids worth of payment protection nobody knew they had.

 

My take is that they're trying to apprear helpful because they know they're in a very sticky situation. I know it is morally dubious but if they can't prove the debt why pay it?

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't anybody else find this interesting? No agreement makes it very difficult for them to pursue payment surely?

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone make a suggestion? Capital One's reply is thus... I've shortened it a little.

 

You requested copies of the executed credit agreement and a statement of your account under section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Please find enclosed a copy of the current terms and conditions of your agreement, in complaince with section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

You requested a copy of the default notice we issued on your account. Under section 78 we are not required to provide a co0py of the default notice and statement of default. However, we can confirm that a default notice was isssued on 26th april 2006 and a statement of default was issued on 16 May 2006 in the sum of £733.23.

 

For your records I have included templates of the default notice and statement of default. These are identical to the letters that you were sent, without the specific details of your default, which is stated above. I also enclose a screen print of your account records confirming the dates the default notice and statement of default were issued.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things

 

1) The credit agreement is not signed by them or the customer. Is this valid? I thought the wording was SIGNED executed agreement?

 

2) Cap one appear to have admitted that they cannot produce a copy of the default. This will be dynamite later (unless I'm very muhc mistaken)....

 

Need to know how best to proceed. I want to send something saying thier goodwill gesture will only be accepted in part payment and file for court.

 

Is this the best course of action (to get the full refund then challenge the default?) or would I be better off probing the agreement a little more?

 

Does it have to be signed? Need some cold hard facts here people!

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi indebtstudent

 

Under s78(1) of the CCA 1974 you are entitled to a copy of the executed (ie signed) agreement plus details of payments, etc. However, under the 1983 regulations the creditor can supply T&Cs and other stuff instead. Having said that, though, this other stauff is not enforceable - to enforce the debt they must provide a copy of an executed agreement. It is an offence for them to provide an application form instead.

 

From what you have posted I didn't understand that they couldn't produce a copy of the default, only that they didn't have to under the CCA - which is true, they don't. However, if you send them an SAR they should produce it - make sure though that you explicitly ask for it (they will try any excuse...).

 

Finally, if you wnat the default removed (and this is reasonable if the default is about the same as the amount charged in unlawful charges) you must stick to your guns and not accept any offer as a final settlement until the offer includes removal of the default. Otherwise you have no lever to persuade them to remove the default.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things

 

1) The credit agreement is not signed by them or the customer. Is this valid? I thought the wording was SIGNED executed agreement?

 

2) Cap one appear to have admitted that they cannot produce a copy of the default. This will be dynamite later (unless I'm very muhc mistaken)....

 

Need to know how best to proceed. I want to send something saying thier goodwill gesture will only be accepted in part payment and file for court.

 

Is this the best course of action (to get the full refund then challenge the default?) or would I be better off probing the agreement a little more?

 

Does it have to be signed? Need some cold hard facts here people!

Send them an SAR request and this will have the default notice within it. Make a point of making sure you write within your request you want to see ALL CORRESPONDENCE including default notice.

 

Sounds like the CCA is unenforceable - can you scan and post it here? (remove sensitive data) NO CCA = NO DEBT for them to enforce.

 

If this is so you can claim back Charges, Interest they charged you, PPI and add the 8% interest to it. You can do this in a court claim. You can also ask court to allow damages and for an order to get the default removed and for the negative data to be removed from CRA files (equifax, experian etc..).

Because if there wasn't any CCA in place they should not be sharing your data without your permission, balances are wrong due to charges and so on - if there is NO CCA Cap1 don't have any rights at all.

 

Hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I don't have a scanner but honesty it is just standard T & C stuff with a name printed on it. I could do it if I had the template. The default notice is the same except it has [insert name here], it is definately a template.

 

I have already sent an SAR as the intention was to claim charges back. They have refunded the difference between the charges and the OFT figure (which I know is utter rubbish).

 

The fact they haven't produced the document indicates to me that they cant (eg I sent for one to A & L just for daft and it arrived within the week).

 

So yes I've already sent an SAR so I'll just send another one saying I want ALL information they hold and point out that thier offer is not accetpable. The charges alone come to £200 (leaving the debt at just under £500 - below the actual limit). Then there will be interest IF it goes to court. Along with the SAR I'll put all of this stuff in about default and not having my consent.

 

Am I best off being proactive giving them strict timescales or taking the laid back approach and saying go ahead sue me? (well in this case my bro).

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi there,

I am in exactly the same boat as you, seems to me that we got exactly the same letter and templates, I have posted them on my thread have a look and see what you think.

 

Mrs c

 

sorry don't know how to do links.

 

Its capital one and buchan clark and wells in the capital one forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

They came up with the document eventually so best to get this claim in ASAP, always get your retaliation in first :)

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven4064

 

Thanks for the info,:) okay so there may be no hope for me then,as I have read that, thought yeah that looks easy,and I still can't do it.

I am getting so frustated with myself ha ha.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right I'm having a sorting out day today, I've just done the LBA for Halifax and I'll knock out the court claim for Cap One today. Just one more question now that I'm starting to help them get sorted Cap One have sole the Debt to Lowell.

 

I detest these debt collection companies and would rather they made any payments to Cap One. I guess they can't do this unless Lowell isn't really a company and is part of Cap One if you get my drift.

 

I think I'll get my answer if Cap One cave in. If they credit the funds to the account then clearly they can still operate it and payments will be made accordingly, if not they'll get a cheque which they can give to another creditor :)

 

I can't decide whether to put in the default issue. They've been defaulted for £700 odd but this already wrong since the balance has been reduced. Assuming they pay the other charges the amount will be below £500 which was the original credit limit.

 

Does this make a difference or are they screwed because the whole amount of the default isn't charge related (the charges didn;t help like!)...

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the issue is whether you would have got the deafult anyway. If not, go for it. If your position was such that you would have got the default anyway, then leave it out.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm not going to put it in because I want to try something else I found on here to clear it :)

 

PLus the default would have happened anyway.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry yeah they came up with the goods after quite a long time, they've sold the debt to Lowell hence my sudden interest in bringing the case to court.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have s ent a letter to Lowell informing them that court papers have been issued and that they cannot enforce the debt etc. I'll send sterner letters depending what course of action they take.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Field for court now, the staff member at the court told me all charges cases were being stayed but I don't think this is correct. If it is then they'll just have to wait, what a pity :)

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It certainly is not correct - the only cases that should be stayed are cases for charges on personal current accounts since those arethe only cases to which the OFT case applies. Make sure that the court staff are aware of that. THe OFT case most certainly does not apply to credit card claims.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...