Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CL Finance March 2006 CCj, paying Lewis, Cohen want to up payments?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, thanks for reading this.

 

I have a number of credit card debts and three CCJ's.

 

Im keeping to all the monthly payments set by the court but

 

one of the DCA's has written to me saying they want me to complete a further "evidence of means" declaration

with a view to making increased installmants, failing which they will apply to the Court for a formal amendment.

 

I cant afford to pay any more and Ive been keeping to the terms of the order.

 

..does anyone have any ideas?

can they do this?

Is it worth my while asking for a copy of the credit agreement at this late stage?

 

Surely a court application will bring costs which will wipe out the payments ive made under the original order thus far!

Any advice would be helpful.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLGYD

 

Am no expert :) !!

 

However, you might be better ringing the court re this.

 

Have had a similar problem but this was because of a Charging Order.

 

I was advised to pay £150 a month which I couldn't afford. I rang the court and was advised to fill in a form N245 (this is an form which is an application for suspension of a warrant and/or variation of an order).

 

I filled it in and ended up only having to pay £10 per month by order of the court.

 

This is only in my experience but obviously this was regarding a Charging Order. CCJs might be different.

 

Personally, I think you should ring the court re this.

 

Hope this is of assistance :D

 

On the form N245 you basically have to fill in your incomings and outgoings. You will have to pay £35 to the court for this.

Be totally honest when you fill it in, I did and I ended up (by order of the court) only paying £10 per month.

 

Do not take this as gospel - am fairly new to this. More experienced CAGers may be able to give you more advice than I can ;)

 

By the way, who is the DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

the DCA is C L Finance Ltd although I make payments on a bank giro credit to the lewis Group

 

..its the Solicitors Howard Chowen who have written to me.

 

Its my understanding that if you are keeping to the terms of the original judgment then they cannot take any enforcement action

but if this is correct does it hold true for seeking to making an application to increase the size of the payments?

 

The order is about a year old, im making payments of £5 per month.

 

An application in terms of costs will take away all the payments ive made......

 

Should I stir the DCA up by asking for a copy of the credit agreement at this stage,

i bet they would be unable to provide it. Any help etc etc

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no point asking for the Credit Agreement after a CCJ has been made. Judgement has already been granted on the debt.

 

It sounds as if they might be trying it on with you in the hope that you will increase payment to them. Submit an income/expenditure form and make sure that you have no more to give than what you are currently paying, after you have deducted for essential living costs. There will then be no point in them applying to the court for anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, but am I obliged to provide this information?

 

I dont want them contacting my employer or my landlord...

 

.I would provide this information to the Court if necessary but not a DCA.

 

I recall, when discussing my problems with the CCCS sometime ago,

 

they told me that my debts were all unsecured and that creditors were not entitled to this info.

 

So, im planning to write back and say that im not prepared to provide this information to anyone other than the Court and see what happens..

 

..any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi grindthemdownintothedust

 

My feeling here is that the same as anything else set by a judge, only a judge can change it.

 

Contact the court that made the judgement as already indicated and they may tell you how to handle this. The DCA have already taken you to court and a judgement was made, they cannot force you to make additional payment, wether through a solicitor or not. They have to abide by the ruling as well.

 

dencha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know when the CCJ was made?

I have read somewhere here that a CCJ can be challenged at a later date if the debt included unfair charges and that you were, at the time unaware that these could be claimed back. I think the court can remove the CCJ on these grounds and then the proccess starts again. CL Finance would have to re-apply for the CCJ and at this point you ask for CCA.

I am pretty sure they wouldn't be able to produce it because I am in court next week with CL Flidiots, they sent me the usual copy of credit card application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a lot depends on whether you want to go to court or not. I (usually) work on the assumption that most folk don't... which is why I suggested the income/expenditure breakdown. If you are happy to go to court though, then that's fine... in which case, you don't need to provide them with anything. Just make sure that you maintain the existing arrangement.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I doubt if a Judge would be too happy with a DCA going back to court after just over a year questioning their judgement, which I suspect the solicitors are aware of, unless of course they have found something with the CRA,s to make them think they can get more, but again can only be through the court.

 

It is a fact that only a judge can change this. Both parties have to keep to the judgement.

 

I found it interesting though that if the CCJ is set aside then you can apply for the CCA. It may be worth trying to force them to take this action.

 

dencha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for (all) your help. im grateful.

 

How, exactly, would I go about attampting to set the original judgment aside.

 

..do i need to ask CL Finance to provide copues of statements in order to establish whether there are any "excessive" charges,

for im not sure I have all my credit card statements going back that far!

 

Thanks again

 

PS..im more than happy to go to Court and argue my case as to why im not in aposition to make increased payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting a CCJ set aside is not an easy process.... and it may be worth posting a question on Legalities in order to find out how to go about it, what's involved, how long it would take and so on.

 

In order to find out about unlawful charges, you would need to send a SAR to the original creditor in order to find out what charges were added before it was passed/sold to the DCA. There are a number of CAG members who know how to go about this.... but, if no-one is able to advise on this thread, I would PM one of the mods. for advice.

 

If the debt wasn't sold to the DCA by absolute assignment, then I don't believe that they could take you to court in their own right anyway.... only the original creditor would have those rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this is a few days later, but I wanted to add my $0.02, because I've just done a load of research thanks to a situation I found myself involved with today.

 

From what I understand... once a CCJ has been made against you, it is usually passed to an agency (which could be a DCA) to enforce and uphold. If you can't pay it in full, the agency will negotiate with you about what you can afford. You have a choice about whether you negotiate with them, or whether you submit the N245 to court and have the monthly payments included as part of the judgement itself.

 

Although it costs £35 to do, from what I can see, it's much better to do it through the courts. If it's an arrangement with the DCA directly, then it's on their terms and at any point they can pull the rug out from underneath you and ask you to increase payments or demonstrate why you can't. If it's a court ordered monthly payment, the DCA is powerless to do anything so long as you're keeping up with your payments. For the sake of thirty five quid, you're getting court protection and peace of mind that they can't do anything.

 

I have a company right now trying to intimidate me into arranging a monthly plan with them, but the National Debtline advised me to go for the N245 instead. I hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...