Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Haybaby V Nationwide


haybaby
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6172 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

Have been reading the forum for a couple of days now and thought i would post.

 

Have been working off of one of the other forums upto now as theres loads of knowledge all over the place it seems.

 

My story to date is that i have got all my charges and added them all up in a compond interest rate Excell spreadsheet for 6 years.

 

I then added nationwides unathourised borrowing rate at 24.9% and the charges with Contractual Interst have come upto just shy of £14k the charges alone were just under £3k.

 

Alot of interest as you can see.:grin: Bit concerned about this now but its too late really.

 

I have split the claim into 3 to keep under the £5k MCOL limit for small claims and submitted them over a couple of weeks as and when i could afford it.

 

The POC i used is below:

The Claimant holds acc. no. xxxxxxxxx with

Defendant. From xx-xx to xx-xx, Defendant

debited charges iro of purported breaches of

contract. Defendant has been supplied with

list of charges and interest. Claimant

contends: a-The charges exceed the

Defendant's losses caused by such breaches;

b-The Term permitting the Defendant to levy

such charges is unenforceable under Unfair

Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations

1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and at

Common Law. c-If charges are a fee for a

service, then they must be reasonable under

S.15 of Supply of Goods and Services Act

1982. Claimant claims: a-Return of amounts

debited of £xxxxxx; b-Interest of xx% -

£xxxxx as per contractual rate of interest;

Any default notices to be removed.

Costs allowed by the Court.

 

This should be ok finger crossed as others have used it.

 

The claim as been aknowledged on all three claims from eversheds and they going to defend the the full amount.

 

they now have until the 3rd July to submit there defence before i can request Judgement.

 

Just hope i haven't messed up anywhere.

 

I geuss its just the waiting game now:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys looks like i might have been givern some bad advice by splitting my claim under the £5k claim limit.

 

All 3 cliams have been aknowledged already and have been in the court process for nearly 3 weeks now.

 

There 28 days ends on the 10 july.

 

Is there anything i can do to try and not get these chucked out from the court for misusing there system.

 

Or

 

Is it to late and i just have to suck it and see.:shock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Haybaby,

 

I would advise that you should read through all the FAQ's on the website. I was advised with my claim to just put in the 1 claim. I waited until I had the money to do this as it was over 5k, but was advised not to put in seperate claims as this could be deemed detrimental.

 

With regards schedule of charges you should send 2 copies to the court and 1 copy to the solicitors for each case registered ensuring that they have the claim number on them.

 

Finally with regards mailing the solicitors it is best to send them a reminder mail a couple of days before the deadline, and then again on deadline day.

 

Hope this helps.

 

 

If you find this info useful please click on the scales

  • Haha 1

Nationwide - S.A.R sent 3/1/07

Statements receieved 01/02/07

Pre Lim sent 10/02/07

LBA sent 25/02/07

MCOL Submitted 14/05/2007

Case Closed - Won from NW 14/06/2007

 

 

Lloyds TSB -

Prelim sent 30/04/07

LBA Sent 15/05/07

 

OHs Lloyds TSB

Pre Lim Sent 30/04/07

LBA Sent 15/05/07

 

T-Mobile - Prelim sent 8/1/07 **WON** 18/1/07

 

 

Capital One - Prelim sent 10/01/07

Offer letter receieved 29/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately i have got to far through my claim now and didnt find this site untill after i had submitted everything and had been acknowledged on MCOL.

 

I would have defo done thing differently if i had found this site before i started.

 

I have just emailed the courts the Schedule of Charges and the Solicitors aswell.

 

If i hadnt of seen it on here i wouldnt of known they were needed till after they had entered a defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as i have now submitted the details of charges to both the court and the solicitors when is it worth giving them a nudge to pay up.

 

They only have uptill the 10 of july to enter there defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just had this back from eversheds after sending in the schedules i take this is the normal response.

 

Dear Sir,

We acknowledge receipt of the copies of schedules.

Have a good day.

Yours faithfully,

Genevieve Tan

Legal Administrator

Legal Services Group

Cardiff

Eversheds LLP

 

 

also is it worth sending my nudge email next week to her directly or use the nbs email address still.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Haybaby,

 

The nationwide take it to the wire unfortunately and they will probably enter a defence right at the last minute just to draw it out even longer, some have suceeded with e-mails to Eversheds ey=tc, my claim was for nearly £6,000 and they paid up 4 days before the 28 days were up without contacting their Solicitors then others have had to wait even longer its judt pot luck at moment when they pay up, but providing you have done everything right they will pay up, eventually, Good luck:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Haybaby,

 

My 28 days are up 7/7/07 (see my thread yesterday about email). Looks like I did a similar thing to you 'cos using different thread advice. Same solicitors + personel etc. Still waiting to hear back from a 2nd e-mail I sent 'cos of the wording of my initial reply.

 

Gettin' a bit close to 28 days now but the more case law I've read the more determined I feel that these Institutions have taken advantage of their postion, and don't mention NW being a "mutual" or "Friendly" Society. Arrrggg. Gonna have to lie down again now. Sure I'm geting an ulcer with all this:evil:.

 

Anyway good luck

And dont let the Bankers get you down!!!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i want to send eversheds a poke letter as there is only 2 weeks left until they can defend.

 

Is it worth asking if they have all the neccessary info and is there a standard template somewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thinking of sending this as a nudge letter advice on it please

 

Dear Sir / Madam

In reference to the claims i have with Nationwide Building Society

xxxxxxxxx for £4386.99

xxxxxxxxx for £4838.34

xxxxxxxxx for £4595.87

As you are aware we are now aproaching the 28 days in which you have to file a defence for these claims.

I am sure your client Nationwide is aware of the increased cost in interest to the claim the longer these case's go on.

i suggest, and feel that the court would agree we try to settle this claim before a court appearance is needed. I am also sure you are aware that the vast majority of these case also end up with the claiment winning the case.

On this note i would take £13821.20 as full and final settlement on all 3 claims paid into nationwide account xx-xx-xx xxxxxxxxx.

This amount would resolve all outstanding claims with nationwide and i would then withdraw from court action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok have sent this now shall wait and see if i get a response.

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

In reference to the claims i have with Nationwide Building Society

 

xxxxxxxxx for £4386.99

xxxxxxxxx for £4838.34

xxxxxxxxx for £4595.87

 

As you are aware we are now aproaching the 28 days in which you have to file a defence for these claims.

 

I am sure your client Nationwide is aware of the increasing costs in

interest and court fees to the claims, The longer these case's go on.

i suggest, and feel that the court would agree we try to settle this claim

before a court appearance is needed and any further court time is

required.

 

I am also sure you are aware that the vast majority of these case's also

end up with the claiment winning the case.

 

On this note i would take £13821.20 as full and final settlement on all 3

claims paid into nationwide account xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx.

 

This amount would resolve all outstanding claims with nationwide and i

would then withdraw from court action.

 

If you need any further information from myself regarding these claims

that would help in a speedy resolution please do not hesitate to contact

me.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

guys just checked my account and have had some payments by cash appear in my account they are 2 payments so far making £820 which seems an odd amount any ideas my claims are split into three and not one of them equal £820

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to a guy at nationwide and my first two claims will be in my account today but at only 8% this is not what i have been claiming and it should have been at 24.9%.

 

What shall i do.

 

Do i send them a letter saying i will take it as part payment?

Just take the money and run?

 

 

Also he said they work the interst out on each indivdual amount but this will add up for less then what it does if you put the 8% in the spreadsheet.

 

Really stuck on what to do now as its obviously a lot less then what i was going for.

 

Also is it worth transfering the money out of this account into another one so they cant claw it back at any point.

 

I have not agreed to any payments or settlement from them.

 

the guy on the phone called nathan said the onbudsman and the court advise to pay back the charges with the statuary 8% not sure if this is true or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...