Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2010 Nationwide Claimform -they lost as judge agreed my sig was a copy and paste - can i now seek retribution?


shooter67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

in 2010 I was taken to court for non payment of nationwide credit card,

I stopped paying because they couldn't supply me with the original signed agreement,

they did send a copy of the original agreement which they had copied & pasted my signature onto.

The case was awarded to me as the judge agreed my signature was indeed copied & pasted, I never had to repay the outstanding amount on the card.

I am now wondering if I can take Nationwide back to court for committing fraud, I still have all the documents from the court case.

Please advise, 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Nicky Boy changed the title to Nationwide
  • dx100uk changed the title to 2010 Nationwide Claimform -they lost as judge agreed my sig was a copy and paste - can i now seek retribution?

statute of limitation has expired

thread title updated.

dx

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why have you only thought about it just now?

What losses have you incured as a result of this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't we have a little exploration. Do you still have an account with them? Send them a subject access request – account or no account.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I forgot to say, I didn't incur any loses, I didn't have to pay the remaining £3800 that was on the credit card. Though Nationwide did register it as a debt on my credit reference files for 6 years.

Yes I still have my mortgage with them.

Edited by shooter67
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a subject access request today.

Are you saying that they continued to register as a debt even though the judge held that the documentation was forged?

This decision occurred in 2010 – correct?

I have to say that you been here since 2013. I don't understand for the life of me why you didn't tell us about this then

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Nationwide did register it as a debt even though I won the case. It was around 2010/2012 I will have a look at the documents tonight for dates.

I was on here before 2013, as the advice I was given on here, along with the templates for the different letters I sent prior to appearing in court helped me enormously, I wouldn't have had a much of a clue if I'd had to have done it myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't suppose you got a transcript of the judgement?

 

And we would certainly need to see a copy of the judgement in PDF format

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, shooter67 said:

I was on here before 2013,

must have been a diff username then.

shooter67 was created feb 2013

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And when I am referring to the transcript of the judgement, I'm referring to a transcript of the judge's reasoning when producing the judgement. This could be one or two pages long

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...