Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • for more information both driving offences were on the same day 18/11/23 so currently fall inside the 6 month mark for prosecution is that correct?
    • You're a wizard with Booking.com, Dave. I'll wait to see if you have any joy talking to your buddy and hope you have a good catch up. Thank you for doing this. I'm not sure the owner of this gite knows what she's doing so I'll certainly mention what you've just said about customer services. I'll wait for the result of your conversation first, though. HB
    • Yes, I noticed that.  Too much of a coincidence methinks!  The OP says they never received a LoC and then in the CPR answer the solicitors say they hold a copy of the LoC but don't include it. I think the best thing is not to request a copy but use this against them in your WS - you never received LoC and indeed in their answer to your CPR request (included an an exhibit in the WS) they included various documents but not the LoC.
    • Frustratingly I've got a voice WhatsApp message from my friend but he's misunderstood the situation and thinks it's you who wants to cancel.  Anyway, I've answered asking if I can call him and hopefully the two of us will be free at the same time today to actually speak on the phone. In the meantime I found this on a page I think meant for people/businesses who have listings on Booking.com How can I communicate with guests to inform them about unforeseen issues at my property and initiate a cancellation? If you’re experiencing unforeseen issues and can’t accommodate your guests, you must report this to our customer service. They will support you with the cancellation request and relocation of the guests, if applicable. https://partner.booking.com/en-gb/help/reservations/changes-cancellations/handling-cancellations-and-guests-cancellation-requests#question-153182 So that's what the host should be doing.  
    • Hi ALl,    Would appreciate some advice and support. I went to insure my car with my partner last night and they refused insurance. I checked my dvla license online and it stated I have been disqualified for 6 months. This is due to 2 driving offences that I failed to identify the driver. I moved house a year ago and completely forgot about changing the registered address. This went to court on 14th May 24 and was given a fine for both and 6 points each totalling 12 points and a 6 month ban. I have read a few things online and spoken to a couple of solicitors for a quick consultation and views and opinions are so varied. Some solicitors are charging extortionate money for something that I know takes 5 mins such as the statuary declaration.    I am going to complete a statutory declaration today and get a solicitor to sign and submit this. But is this just delaying the inevitable? what's the likely hood of being able to overturn this and just pleading guilty to the original 2 offences and take the 3 points for each and a fine with no ban? Any help would be much appreciated, I have been sent the papers by the courts today so have this to hand. Looks like I'm only being charged for the failure to identify and not that and the speeding offence if that makes any difference.    R
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim struck out


kermitngonzo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just received a general form of judgement say that my claim has been struck out having failed to pay the allocation fee. I am totally confused as I was not sent an AQ and therefore did not fill one out so don't know why this has been ordered???

Telephoned the court to explain this and they told me that the judge has just struck out the claim and it may not be because of the allocation fee. They cannot give me a reason. The judge has just struck it out and that is that.

 

I'm totally gutted. That money is mine and I worked hard for it.

Is there anything I can do to appeal against the decision? I asked the court about this and they said I should seek legal advice. :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been looking round the site and it seems that a few people have had their claims reinstated after having been struck out. If this is possible...how do I go about it?

Feel like sending a nudge letter to DG anyway. They're probably so snowed under that they might not realise my claim has been struck out and send the money anyway! :rolleyes: Then again.:-|

 

Feel like I've been treated very unfairly. The courts have basically told me that the judge has made the decision, they cannot give me a reason, and do not have to, and that is that. Surely they have to give me a valid reason???

 

I'm determined to get MY money back. I'm not going to give up. Even if I have to start all over again from the beginning. It's the principle. I've worked hard for that money and it's mine.

 

Could really do with some advice if anyone is out there :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no special knowledge, but I would have thought that it couldn't do any harm to send a letter to the court manager referring to the wording of the order (which you say states the reason as non-payement of allocation fee - correct?) and explaining the situation.

 

I'm sure it must be possible to appeal against an order to strike out. It might be worth saying something like -Since the order appears to have been made as the result of a misunderstanding, I am sure that the situation can be resolved without my placing any additional burden on the courts by appealing against this decision. I would therefore ask that the order be rescinded, or such other steps be taken as are necessary to reinstate my claim.

 

Again, I don't have any special knowledge of how these things work, but that's what I would do in your situation.

 

best of luck!

 

stax

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, and that is why in my aq thread and several other places we advise ringing the court when it says that the allocation questionaire is being dispensed with in a particular case to find out if the fee is still payable.

the fee is for the allocation of the case and not for the questionaire. most courts who dispense with the questionaire also do not ask for the fee but we have seen those who do - and they don't let you know that it is payable - the claimant needs to find out if it is payable. so, in answer to your question - yes - this is possible, we have seen it before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also - just to clarify. The letter stating that my claim has been struck out because of failure to pay the allocation fee is the first time I have heard any mention of allocation at all. No questionairre and nothing saying they will be dispensing with the questionairre either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok you need to file for an order to have the strike out reversed or set aside.

It would also be a good idea to start your own thread in your bank section.......advantages are that we can look back on your history (if you have been keeping it up to date of course)

For the moment though I will leave it here.

To be honest I am a little confused about what I am reading especially since other posters are saying this is not a one off.

To be honest I have never heard of this.

Will come back to you after consulting with the team.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

martin, around 1 april when the first of the mcol were dispensing with the aq's we were merrily going on our way - about 4 weeks later - peeps were getting the info that they may have to pay the aq fee - so we - including crusher were kicking it around and started telling peeps to ring their local courts to ask if it were payable. we have seen several where it was told to them if it wasn't paid by such and such a date it would be thrown out but i don't know of any which actually were - most caught it before it was thrown out. it was bookworm i think who pointed out that we needed to tell people to check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The order received says:

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

 

1. The claimant having failed to pay the allocation fee, the claim is struck out.

 

That's it.

 

Lively - I will PM you back asap with the rest of my court correspondance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on my Notice of Transfer of Proceedings dated 16th June it states:

 

1. The filing of an allocation questionaire be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise. **

 

** Please note that an allocation fee may be payable in this instance. Please contact the court of transfer for further details.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I've just had a good look through my court letters and on my Notice of Transfer of Proceedings it does say that the filing of an allocation questionaire be dispensed with etc etc... feel really stupid now.

 

Guess i should have checked it properly and phoned my court to ask if the fee was still payable. Lateralus you were right.

 

Where do i go from here? Will I have to start my claim from the beginning again?

 

Feel like a proper idiot now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to dispute judgement, use the N244 The fee is £65 which you can not recover. Also should the judge allow this you need to pay the AQ fee. This will need to be submitted to your local (the court that sent order) Ring them and inform them that you intend to take this action they will also advise you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...