Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Thanks and sorry


clairus99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6530 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for closing my thread. Sorry I didn't kiss anyone's backside and you're refusing to help.

 

Thank you for helping me get as far as NW filing a defence.

 

I never saw this as free.

 

I saw this as a helpful site that I would GLADLY have donated to and recommended when this was over.

 

Sorry I don't have the money to do it beforehand, but then, I thought it was a free service.

 

I hope your ego is satisfied that I have to continue the rest of this alone and have my account closed whilst achieving NOTHING as I don't know how to continue. I never said I knew everything. If I did it wouldn't make sense for me to come here for information, would it.

 

I'm sure you will feel more smug about upsetting and worrying me like this than your frequent sarcastic comments at other people. Well done, feel proud of yourself.

 

I'm sure this thread will get "lost" in the system too.

But then again, what do I know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

Moderators put in 100% effort on this site, We don't get paid for it, we do it to show our appreciation to Dave and Bankfodder, and becuase we have experience.

 

I am sure you have had help in the past, and some new members probabally have had no input from a mod as yet as we are i so much demand.

 

I for one spend my day's behind the scene's answering literally hundereds of Emails from the "contact us" page, if people used their head a bit more, I would be free to help others who really need it, or are desperate or struggling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clairus I followed your thread last night and tried to stand up for you, but this just isn't fair. It is a free service, except for the people who started the forum with money from their own pockets, which is why we ask for donations.

 

I haven't paid anything yet, because I haven't got anything back yet, so money doesn't come into it or what you pay. We are all here for each other and don't need people having a go if they don't like the methods used. Have you read the rules of the forum and what you can and can't post?

 

If you want help, then we will all try, but please don't have a go at us if you don't like the replies. Nobody means to offend.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for closing my thread. Sorry I didn't kiss anyone's backside and you're refusing to help.

 

Thank you for helping me get as far as NW filing a defence.

 

I never saw this as free.

 

I saw this as a helpful site that I would GLADLY have donated to and recommended when this was over.

 

Sorry I don't have the money to do it beforehand, but then, I thought it was a free service.

 

I hope your ego is satisfied that I have to continue the rest of this alone and have my account closed whilst achieving NOTHING as I don't know how to continue. I never said I knew everything. If I did it wouldn't make sense for me to come here for information, would it.

 

I'm sure you will feel more smug about upsetting and worrying me like this than your frequent sarcastic comments at other people. Well done, feel proud of yourself.

 

I'm sure this thread will get "lost" in the system too.

 

 

If you read around the site all the information is there that you need. It takes time, but it's there. Good Luck with your claim.

12th May DPA sent to Natwest

17th May pre-lim sent £1241

26th May Full refund offered

27th May Accepted!!

on with next....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again, a totally uncalled for and unwarranted attck on the very people that have helped to reclaim money already (£241.50 from First Direct).

 

You went from question to 'I give up' in the space of 7 hours yesterday, expecting personal, one-to-one assistance.

 

Your query on that thread was also answered, by me, before being closed. I'm not a solicitor or barrister, in fact I have no legal training or background what-so-ever. I just got up off my **** and searched for the answer - for you! Something you could have at least tried to do yourself....

 

I think this thread serves only to show you in a poor light.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if I should comment on this as I didn't see the original thread but feel I should stand up and be counted.

 

As I understand it this site was set up by a group of people who decided that the people in the UK were being taken for a ride by the banks and felt that there needed to be a central point for help/advice, which they have primarily funded themselves. That is of course, forgetting the time that they put in, probably to the annoyance of their families.

 

A few weeks ago I thought I had really mucked things up - to the extent that I was half prepared to accept that I had 'wasted' £120 (which I didn't have) on making a claim. Thanks not only to the help that I received on this site...but also had words of support and encouragement from others making claims and probably as ignorant as me.....I carried on and today received a cheque for £2250 - ok not my full claim but £2250 more than I thought I would those few short weeks ago.

 

Yes it might be frustrating if you initially don't get a response but lets face it, this is more or less a self help group and as such, people aren't going to be sat by their computers - they do have lives you know! - just waiting for people to come and ask questions, which probably could be answered by a little searching.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aww, i miss all the gossip! any chance of somebody filling me in? lol! send me a quote or something? just to say i dont think you as mods ever come across as sarcastic but sometimes a little sharp? but then its usually due to people who havent taken the time to 'LOOK' for the answers and therefore waste your very valuable time! i for one appreciate all you do so please dont be put off by these lazy, impatient people. i hope i havent offended anyone with my comments? Diane x:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ironically Clairus that's all it would have taken...

 

A thanks. And a sorry.

 

No money required. No donation necessary (however much appreciated).

 

A thanks for the information you have siphoned, the awareness and knowledge you now have, and the support you have received to date from both moderators and users.

 

A sorry for the rude, impatient, lazy, and presumptious behaviour.

 

There are 28,000 users... plus you. What does that say?

 

The sad thing is, when I first read your thread title, I was rather tickled by the thought that you had actually taken on board some of the previous comments and were genuinely posting your gratitude and apology.. Hmmm.

 

Anyway enough said, methinks that the genuine users and moderators of this forum have better places to post than here... therefore:

 

THREAD CLOSED (ONCE AGAIN).

"BA Group. The World's favourite CA Group"

 

HSBC 2 claims amalgamated. £1195. settled in full prior to filing claim.

BARCLAYS settled in full 2 days prior to submission of defence by Barclays

CAP ONE settled in full on day 14 of LBA (£210)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6530 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...