Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fredrickson International


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am a newbie so please forgive me if i am repeating what many of others have asked.

 

had a phone call at work today from Fredrickson Intl. I do not know what it is about but suspect its about an overdraft that was converted to loan some time ago and that I have been struggling to pay for a couple of years cos we emigrated and then came back and I had a baby etc......

 

I was not there so they left their name, contact name and 0870 number. My husband rang them back on the mobile. The person who rang was not available and the other person could not find me in their system.

 

I'm very worried cos I have a job that means I cannot go bankrupt etc. I can't pay it back straightaway and I am scared of what they may do.

 

Help and advice is what I need. The original loan was with NatWest.

 

Any ideas folks cos I do not think i shall be able to sleep tonight.:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Send Fredrikson a CCA request. You can find one here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html template N.

 

The CCA request asks for a copy of the credit agreement that you would have originally signed with Nat West. Without this Fredrickson can not enforce the debt. It is highly likely that they won't have this document.

 

The CCA request also disputes the debt. While a debt is in dispute they can not lawfully pursue you for it.

 

Any questions just shout.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment I have no reference number cos they just called me at work. They also do not have an address for me cos I emigrated although i work in the same place I did before I left. Do I put that work address on then cos that is where they have located me?

 

And do i say that I shall not discuss it over the phone?

 

Thanks by the way. I'm a quivering wreck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all calm down DCA's have very little powers. They will lie and attempt to intimidate you into paying a debt that they often can not substantiate. NEVER speak to them on the phone INSIST that all communication is in writing. They can later deny what they have said over the phone.

 

Rather than send the CCA request you may initially wish to try a slightly different approach as in the letter below:

 

Your home address)

_________________

_________________

Date: ____________

 

 

To: ______________

__________________

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

You have contacted me/us regarding an account which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert debt collection agency's name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Print Your Name - do not sign)

You may also wish to attach this telephone harrassment letter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/37006-harassment-telephone-response-letter.html

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to be calm. I'm using deep breaths etc but still feel very icky.

 

Believe it or not I am involved in the legal profession but do not do this area of work at all and can deal marvellously with others problems but not my own.

 

I shall have to contact them to get the reference number though won't I? Otherwise they will not know to what I am referring. I cannot have them ringing work cos I will get into sooooooooo much trouble. :rolleyes:

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shall have to contact them to get the reference number though won't I?

No. They didn't need one to contact you at work, they don't need one to respond to your correspondence. Remember it is up to them to prove the debt not for you to prove that you don't owe it.

 

I would put something in the harassment by telephone letter about never contacting you at work.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering, if its an overdraft that was converted to a loan ( can't remember signing an agreement though i think it was after a meeting with the bank manager) then does the cca stuff still apply? Do overdrafts have special rules?

 

Soz if they seem like daft questions.:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The majority of overdrafts are covered by a cca (but not usually under sections 77/78). However, as it was converted to a loan ALL loans have to comply with The Consumer Credit Act. So the fact of whether it was originally covered or not is irrelevant.

 

Anyway as they say on South Park - they're no stupid questions, only stupid people ;)

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be. Once they receive your CCA request they will write back to you telling you that the account has been put on hold for 28 days while they investigate your request.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband rang them yesterday before I found this site, and he could not speak to the guy who rang but someone else did a search on their database and could not find me anywhere so I am a bit confused now.:confused:

 

Do I hold off writing to them cos I have no idea what it's about (only a suspicion) or what should I do?:confused:

 

I do not want to then to think I am evading them, i have already made that mistake once although not intentionally, but then again I do not want to put them on notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really you need to get some sort of closure on this matter. If you don't you're leaving yourself open to future phone calls from them at work.

 

Personally I would write to them. They either need to prove the debt or p*ss off.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like your way of thinking.:D

 

I shall write recorded delivery. It is awful having to look over your shoulder and I am the most honest person in the world with a conscience the size of the planet.

 

thanks again, you are a star;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem.....happy to be of help ;)

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi chick, Hope your ok, you will get some really good support on here with fantastic advice. There is no need to be scared anymore. Just listen to the people here and follow advice to the letter. DO NOT RING THEM. You will find the letters you in need in the general section of the debt action section. go to the last sticky by barracud. The cca letter is letter N. Cant remember where the subject access request is. Also dont forget to put on your letter. I do not acknowledge this debt to your company. Send the CCA to DCA, and the Subject access request off to bank. Ask for info from the start date of the account. Bet you will have loads of charges on there. Even if its beyond 6 yrs. Some people have managed to claim that far back. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that.:D

 

Still a tad anxious about it all....perhaps understandably.

 

I'm worried about the fact that overdrafts are exempt. Mine started as an overdraft then was changed to a loan as it was getting big!!!!:eek: I cannot for the life of me remember signing a loan agreement. I suspect they may find an agreement re the o/d from about 1993/94 but not one from when they moved it onto a loan account. I have all my bank statements up to the point they referred it to their inhouse debt recovery dept a few years ago. I then repaid large amounts of it for a few years, then defaulted and now its regarded as a delinquent account.

 

Now i think it may be this that has gone to Fredrickson.

 

Its so nice to see that there are people around who are prepared to help us all out. Thanks SmashedBobo and Rory.;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

smashedbobo, please read the whole of the thread before posting. The DCA in question have yet to even identify the account.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards the overdraft this is irrelevant as it became a loan. However if you wish to know if your overdraft was covered by CCA1974 this should help.

 

From the Consumer Credit Act 1974:

 

Facts. The manager of the C Bank agrees orally with D (an individual) to open a current account in D’s name. Nothing is said about overdraft facilities. After maintaining the account in credit for some weeks, D draws a cheque in favour of E for an amount exceeding D’s credit balance by £20. E presents the cheque and the Bank pay it.

Analysis. In drawing the cheque D, by implication, requests the Bank to grant him an overdraft of £20 on its usual terms as to interest and other charges. In deciding to honour the cheque, the Bank by implication accept the offer. This constitutes a regulated small consumer credit agreement for unrestricted-use, fixed-sum credit. It is a debtor-creditor agreement, and falls within section 74(1)(b) if covered by a determination under section 74(3).

 

Facts. F (an individual) has had a current account with the G Bank for many years. Although usually in credit, the account has been allowed by the Bank to become overdrawn from time to time. The maximum such overdraft has been is about £1,000. No explicit agreement has ever been made about overdraft facilities. Now, with a credit balance of £500, F draws a cheque for £1,300

 

Analysis. It might well be held that the agreement with F (express or implied) under which the Bank operate his account includes an implied term giving him the right to overdraft facilities up to say £1,000. If so, the agreement is a regulated consumer credit agreement for unrestricted-use, running-account credit. It is a debtor-creditor agreement, and falls within section 74(1)(b) if covered by a direction under section 74(3). It is also a multiple agreement, part of which (i.e. the part not dealing with the overdraft), as referred to in section 18(1)(a), falls within a category of agreement not mentioned in this Act.

 

Facts. Under an oral agreement made on 10th January, X (an individual) has an overdraft on his current account at the Y bank with a credit limit of £100. On 15th February, when his overdraft stands at £90, X draws a cheque for £25. It is the first time that X has exceeded his credit limit, and on 16th February the bank honours the cheque.

Analysis. The agreement of 10th January is a consumer credit agreement for running-account credit. The agreement of 15th-16th February varies the earlier agreement by adding a term allowing the credit limit to be exceeded merely temporarily. By section 82(2) the later agreement is deemed to revoke the earlier agreement and reproduce the combined effect of the two agreements. By section 82(4), Part V of this Act (except section 56) does not apply to the later agreement. By section 18(5), a term allowing a merely temporary excess over the credit limit is not to be treated as a separate agreement, or as providing fixed-sum credit. The whole of the £115 owed to the bank by X on 16th February is therefore running-account credit.

 

Facts. The G Bank grants H (an individual) an unlimited overdraft, with an increased rate of interest on so much of any debit balance as exceeds £2,000.

Analysis. Although the overdraft purports to be unlimited, the stipulation for increased interest above £2,000 brings the agreement within section 10(3)(b)(ii) and it is a consumer credit agreement.

 

 

Statute Law database

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have drafted a letter to them along the lines that I have tried contacting them to no avail. In future all their communications with me will have to be via written correspondence, and I reminded them of the OFT guidelines on phone calls and home/work visits etc. I also said they must infrom me in writing who they are and why they are contacting me as I have no idea....cos I don't i am only summising.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you rory for that, But as it happens i do know rather more about this. The poster is well known to me and i referred the poster to this site knowing she would get extra reassurance from folk not so close to the situation. It is difficult to take reassurance from people you are closest too. And yes the DCA does have to identify the account, not for poster to do there work for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't having a go smashedbobo.:) Just thought you were jumping the gun.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lordy.

 

Mine was a current account with an agreed large overdraft to buy a car. Over the years they extended the o/d then it moved from small branch with nice manager to big city centre branch with jobsworth "we have just graduated and don't like you but want to make a good impression on the head office" account managers.

 

They once charged me nearly £700 one month in over limit charges sending me further into the red, then finally converted it to loan with enormous repayments that I could not keep up. I was actually relieved when they sent it to debt management.

 

But again, i am just assuming this is what it is about cos everything else is paid off in full.

 

I much prefer being a child than a grown up.....it's just poohey sometimes.

 

Thanks again chuck.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...