Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm sending back to plea guilty and not appear in court. Nothing to add really. Then complete the form where it ask for my finances, monthly income, employment status and monthly out goings.  
    • What we need to see is all the original paperwork  That would include the pre contract information and the original HP Agreement  Post it up and I will have a good look over it at the weekend  It really hangs on the wording as to whether it’s a scrapage adjustment /discount on the price of the car( that is how some schemes worked) Every manufacturer had their own version  Have you sent VW a SAR?
    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent!!! Please Help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya Monopoly,

Just to let you know you're not alone out there!!!

Unfortunately I don't have the knowledge to be able to help you much but can offer any support you may need.

And a very big thank you for the advice you have given me too!!

Hang in there, it'll all come good in the end, we're all right behind you...

pinky :p

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 253
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you want something to cheer you up monopoly have a read of bluetacks thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/90012-just-been-court-cl.html

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, just to let you know the same as pinky - I haven't been able to say anything more than Laiste - really you are in such safe hands there! I have also bought a new computer and it is rubbish - it's an absolute nightmare on internet connections, etc, even with a few more megs added to memory!! So have taken my old portable from my daughter to stay in touch with the world! You've only got a few days left now and I know you are a bit worried, don't be, they really have no case and are clearly trying to make you sweat it out. The fact that they have got you into such a state at times goes to show how they can use this as a winning tactic against someone with no support. The difference is that you have got support - and fully qualified support at that, from someone who clearly understands the system, so HANG ON IN THERE! I think you may have a nice surprise from your postie very soon.

 

How's baby - I hope you are making the most of your time left and not wasting it on NEXT.................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone. I'll check that link out in a minute rory...

Glad to see I'm not alone in here lol!

The baby's fine calm1. I have 1 full day left with her booooo!

Unfortunately, as the defence has to be filed by Friday, and that's the night I go back to work, I will probably spend the next 2 days on here!

I know next have no chance, I just want to find out more about a c/c and what I could get them for.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read rory's link about bluetack. Well done her! Id love to be typing along those lines in the not too distant future...:D

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tonight's the night - are you ready Monopoly??? I am sooooooooooo excited for you - it's like the who shot JR storyline - we all want to know the outcome of this.................. Look forward to hearing from you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm I think I might have been about 4 when that happened lol! ;)

 

Laiste has been in contact and she's in the process of writing the defence. It will be available either tonight or tomorrow, so you'll get to see what's in store for Next along with me! :eek:

 

Have you figured out what's wrong with your computer yet? I'd take it back if I were you.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi monopoly :-)

 

Just wanted to let you know I'm always around for any support you need although it doesn't seem that you are gonna need much cos you've got Laiste batting for your team and shes a STAR!!

 

Your always there for me in my battle with NW and that is really appreciated, I can't believe you have helped me out so much when you have obviously got more serious things going on. :shock:

 

GO GET EM GIRL and keep us all posted. YOU'RE AMAZING.

 

Speedy :-)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks speedy. Its nice to see I have supporters out there! :)

 

Only 4 hours now until I have to file....

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Monopoly,

 

Here it is, finally! Hope it's okay for you, I'm sure it will do the trick!:wink:

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

 

DEFENCE

 

The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia:-

 

No account number is detailed on the claim form to identify the Defendant as the holder of an account with Next or as someone owing monies to the same. I would therefore contend by reason of want of particularity that the Claimant’s case is entirely spurious and unless amended in compliance with the Civil Procedure Rules, can and should be struck out pursuant to part 3.4 of the same. The remainder of the Defence is pleaded without prejudice in respect of the issues raised by the Claimant in the Particulars of Claim.

 

The Defendant denies that he is liable to the Claimant as alleged in the Particulars of Claim, or at all. On the 7th June 2007, a request for a true copy of the alleged agreement was sent to the Claimant’s Solicitors. The request was made under section 78(1), running account credit, of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. It was sent by guaranteed next day delivery with the requisite £1.00 fee enclosed and received by the Claimant’s Solicitors on the 8th June 2007.The Claimants had twelve working days from receipt of the request in which to furnish a credit agreement, as stipulated in Regulation two of The Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983, which gave them until the 25th June 2007 to comply. The Claimants in a letter I received from them on the 19th June 2007, stated unequivocally that Next do not hold a signed credit agreement and that under section 127(3) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 they know that the debt is unenforceable. Having instigated these proceedings without any legal basis for doing so and allowing the case to continue; in the full knowledge and having admitted that no credit agreement exists, the Claimant’s conduct amounts to unlawful harassment under section 40 of The Administration of Justice Act. Furthermore, the Claimant’s behaviour is entirely vexatious and wholly unreasonable.

 

It is denied that any Default Notice was ever received and the Defendant puts the Claimant to strict proof that said document was received. Additionally, in the letter of the 19th June 2007, the Claimant enclosed a copy of the alleged Default Notice sent. This letter does not conform at all to the requirements of section 88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, in respect of the details a Default Notice must contain, it is therefore entirely legally invalid. It will therefore amount to unlawful processing of my personal details and a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998, if a Default has been registered with any of the Credit Reference Agencies on the basis of a legally invalid Default Notice and furthermore, one that was never received.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to say, copy and paste the defence, don't type it all in the box, it will take forever!:o

 

Also print off the final page when you've done it so you've got a timestamped record that it's been received!

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Laiste, thanks so much for the defence!

There was no way I'd miss the deadline though lol, I was just getting a bit of shut-eye before my shift tonight.

 

I'll go to MCOL now and if I have any trouble, I'll come back here.

 

THANKS AGAIN!

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I dispute the full amount?

Sorry to be thick, but I don't want to get anything wrong.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sending this message just as a precaution. If the system won't let you submit the defence, you need to ring the Court number on the claim form and ask to speak to a manager. Don't mess around having a lengthy chat with of the people that answers the phone, they won't be able to help you and you will just be wasting time.

 

Explain to the manager that due to their system problems, you can't file the def and need his/her email to send the def with a covering note, explaining this. Get the person's name and an ABSOLUTE GUARANTEE from them that if you send it in the next 15-30mins it will be accepted. I have done this for other people, so there are no problems with doing this. Also ask the person to send you a confirmation email/or to ring you to confirm it has been received & accepted. Make sure you cover every angle with this and do not let anyone fob you off! At the end of the day you can file up until 4pm. If their system can't cope that's their problem, not yours! Regardless of what they might say!

 

Hopefully this message will have been an entire waste of time!:wink:

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok everyone, the defence has been filed thanks to the fantastic Laiste, who without, many of us would probably just pay these companies!

 

Once again, eternal gratitude to Laiste! :) :)

 

(I bet she gets sick of all the praise...) ;):rolleyes:

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully this message will have been an entire waste of time!:wink:

 

Laiste.:)

 

Yes it was!!! LOL :D

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been reading through our printed version, and every apostrophy has turned into a question mark! Is this normal?

 

Im sure they won't mind

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's not normal! It would be wise to ring the Court and state what you have noticed. It will make the defence read differently and to some degree illogically, which the Claimant's sols might seize upon. I would ring now rather than leaving it, as otherwise it may be sent to the Claimants before you have the chance to do anything about it!

 

Laiste.:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wee we've tried ringing but can't get through as yet. Just listening to their idea of music at the minute.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi we got through, the woman said she didn't think it would matter...don't know how clued up she was though. She then gave us the number for the helpdesk, who in turn said we had to ring the first number we tried!

 

Sounds familiar...

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Symeon. With that defence, Im sure we won't need it! :D

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes ace defence...

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...