Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,        I really need to start my own thread on this Claim with Overdales/Lowell for a Cap One debt. but have already got to this stage .. My initial question for the moment - until replies come in - is that I figure my main stance is that a purchased debt cannot be claimed, debts can only be claimed by the original issuer of the debt .. but mediation is about coming to an agreement. So would I be acting in bad faith if I enter into mediation yet not seeking to come to a financial agreement? Also, I need to reject the scheduled time slot and ask for another as I'm not going to be free during those hours. The wording of the email gives the impression that I am given this one slot and if I reject it, then I am rejecting mediation - there is no mention of rescheduling, only of freeing up the slot for others .. although, I would have thought it would say so, if there were no possibility to reschedule.. Can I ask for another date without issue?   Anyway, if it's more helpful, I am happy to post up my defence and start a proper thread? I had a lot on at the time and had to do things right away due to the time limits, so didn't feel I had time to come here and go back and forth for info, so put my defence together from reading through relevant threads, late at night. CCA request appears to have been fulfilled (I'm still to check the accuracy of the documents). The other thing, asking solicitors about the particulars of the claim, hasn't .. although I forgot to ask for proof of postage and didn't send recorded post either (whereas the CCA I did), so not sure if I can pursue that easily ..?  
    • There is a plea guilty website...   Screenshot 2024-05-22 144200.pdf
    • Looking for a bit of assistance. I moved into a rented flat on 20th April 2024. I viewed it on the 14th April. Before I moved into the flat, the letting agency provided me with an offer sheet, in said offer sheet I made a number of requests and conditions related to me progressing with assuming the tenancy. These were: 1. A professional clean of the flat prior to move in date. 2. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet be replaced prior to move in date. These were all planned actions by the landlord when I viewed it. I could see the boxes for the hob and other items in the flat. I prepared to move in on the 20th April but none of the work mentioned in the offer sheet had been completed. The standard of the clean was abysmal - mouldy food left in the fridge, nothing wiped down, bathroom mouldy etc. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were also not installed. I decided to not officially move into the flat as it was not in a condition as promised, my partner lives relatively close by so I lived with her initially. It was only on the 24th April that the hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were installed. The cleaners visited again 2 weeks after move in date (3rd April) and attempted another clean of the flat. Again, it was a poor job. I resorted to cleaning the flat myself. I have numerous pictures of the things I identified during my clean and have sent this all to the letting agency. Because of the issues faced, I asked the letting agency that the rent be reduced for the initial month. Exactly halved - to represent the 2 weeks that I was not living at the property. The landlord and letting agency have responded by saying that they will be willing to accept 1 weeks rent as a deduction but not 2. My question is, am I in a strong position to insist on the 2 weeks rent returned or have I been fortunate that they have even offered a weeks rent as a deduction? I would like to insist on the 2 weeks. I have paid the 2 weeks only as my rent collection date passed 2 days ago. Thank you for any assistance. Any further relevant details required let me know and I will provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Harleypups V Lloyds TSB


harleypups
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi sorry to be a pain, I've got the acknowledgement through the post should I send a copy of my charges to there solicitor, I sent a copy of the charges recorded delievery the same day when i put in my claim to the courts

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've actually answered it myself and yes I do, I found the template what should I say about the overdraft intrest which I'm claiming but I know is wrong, as I didn't work it out and just put the follow amount what they said in the schedule of charges? lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've finally got the defence through, it is being transfered to Swindon County Court and they are doing with out questionaire

 

The defence

1 and 2 are just standed points about the accountand the bank

3. By mainting the account in credit, or within any limit agreed with the bank. the customer may avoi most if not all charges, If the customer faoils to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments whether by chq, dc,st or dd the customer makes a request for a payment to be made from the banks own fund. If the bank makes a payment, or returns he payment, it provides a service as specified ibn the leaflet and makes a charge in accordane with the terms of the contract. on page 1 of the leaflet, the Bankexplains that ? there are normally no charges for everyday banking at lloyds TSB when your account is in credit. When you use an agreed overdraft, there is no monthly fee and we only charge intrest on the amount you are overdrawn each day. Where you go overdrawn without an agreement or where you use special services such as copy statement, we will make a charge. This guide explains how these charges work, and when they will apply. If you want to use a service that we haven't listed, we'll tell you the cost of that service before you give us the go ahead".

4. There is no breach of contract, the charge cannot be a penalty, consquently there is no requirement that the charge be a pre-estimate of the banks loss.

5. is all about the warning and prior notification

6. the charges are fair and reasonable, and it is denied that they are unawful.

7. the customer is notified of the charges in plain ittelligible language at the the conclusion of the contract, and on each monthly statement The charges are terms which relate tothe price payable by the customer for a service provided by the bank, and pursuant to Regulation 6 of the Unfair Terms in the Customer Contracts Regulation 1999, are not subject to the assessment of fairness.

8. In the premises

8.1 the charges are for banking services, and are not damage nor a penalty;

8.2 The bnk is entitled by contract to impose the charges, which are fair and reasonable;

8.3 it is denied that the charges are unlawful or contravene any statue or regulation.

9. The claimant's claim is denied in its entirety. It is further denied that the Claimant is entitled to the sum claimed or to any sum from the bank.

 

 

I don't know what most of it means so help please:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Still not heard from the court, but got a letter from Andover today, basically saying they are still not in a position to respond fully to the complaint, and I'm ensure you undersand your rights ect... please bear with us for a little while so they can try to reach an amicable conculsion.

 

What does this mean then? do they not realise that its going to court and is this just another bob standard letter sent out automatically

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi got a letter from the cc today.

 

It is ordered That

the is stayed to enable the cc to file and serve a schedule setting out how the £4849.24 ha been calculated. If the claimant fails to do soby the 15/08/07 the claim shall be stuck out.

 

Is this just a case of posting my spreadsheets with the list of charges on? or somethink more

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok being totally thick.

 

I've printed off my schedule. Just about to write a letter it says please address letter to the court manager. I have a district judge name but do I literally address it to "the court Manager" and please find attached a scehdule setting out how the money has been calculated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes send a copy of your schedule to the Court and one to the Solicitors.

Barty:)

 

Why do I send one to the solicitors, I did send one as soon as I filed my claim, which a copy was sent to me when i got the defence

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...