Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Harleypups V Lloyds TSB


harleypups
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI I filed my claim with Moneyclaim on line this morning and then sent off the schedule off charges as well today recorded delievery. I didn't claim for interest as it would have taken it over 5000 which then meant it would cost £250. It is a case of just sit back and wait or do I need to do anything else? I don't really have a clue what I'm doing and just using templates for everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when I worked out how much i was owed I just put overdraft interest as it was on the statement, have I done that wrong? reading on another thread you can only claim part of it? what should I do now as I've already filed the claim and sent in my sechdule of charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well dont expect them to file there defence before the 24th they will drag it out as long as they can at eavey chance

 

I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a relatively early (by their standards) defence filed on this one

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that if they see an error ( which you have made) in the claim these cases will get prioritised for early defences etc. - simply because they will feel that they have a better chance of winning. They would normally be right in this assumption that many misconceived or badly prepared claims will fail, and those that are stated as such will be more vulnerable to concede at an early stage, however do not worry bide yoiur time and wait for their defence and deal with it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that if they see an error ( which you have made) in the claim these cases will get prioritised for early defences etc. - simply because they will feel that they have a better chance of winning.

 

because all I got from the bank was a list of charges not full statements should I request these now, so I can work out the claim properly or just wait and see. or should I file an admendment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...