Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, thanks.  Jake Burgess is well known to us - and well despised. Friday would be great as then there would be the weekend to tweak things. 👍
    • Thanks FTMDave.  VCS's WS was from Jake Burgess.  I will draft my WS and share with copies of court order, and VCS's exhibits asap.  I'm away tomorrow so more likely Friday.  Thanks again for the advice   
    • Thanks. Time to move on this. 1.  You need to tweak the magnificent WS that dx suggested.  Adapt it to your case.  It should take you about half an hour (I recently wrote a WS from scratch during a train journey which wasn't optimum 😂 with lots of cross referencing and it took me an hour an half, you have one already cooked thanks to dx). 2.  We will add bits to ridicule VCS's WS - it's rich that they moan about your defence being standard when their Particulars of Claim are too and also include the rubbish about keeper/driver that has been criticised numerous times by the courts. 3.  Who wrote their WS?  Was it Mohammed Wali or Ambreen Arshad or have they got someone new? 4.  We need to see a good chunk of VCS's exhibits.  I don't get why we have to keep asking you for things rather than them being volunteered.  Isn't it obvious that we can't help you compile a decent WS if we can't see what the other side is arguing?  All their silly signs aren't needed, but any contract with the landowner is important as are all the photos of your vehicle. 5.  You've never shown us the court order which fixes the hearing date.  It should be obvious we need to see what the court has ordered.  This is the second time we've asked. 6.  VCS were using Elms Legal.  Are Elms Legal still involved? 
    • As per my post above, I believe they are attending - either themselves or a representative on their behalf, as I have not received any notice either by post/email that says otherwise
    • I actually did one better and came to a settlement, didn't cost me a penny. so great result...case closed. Many thanks for your help, much appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yes Yes Yes **first Win From Kensington!!!!!!!!!!**


Louisk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi thanks Bona that would be very useful to know if we have a different argument in this regard.

Many thanks

Catherine

xx

:D :D :DMoney in account £13216.66!!!!

GMAC - stmnts rec'vd letter requesting £1662 refund of chrges MCOL on line being issued for ERC

SPML - issued MCOL on 21.11.06!

Kensington - statements received letter requesting £2455.55 refund of charges issuing MCOL for ERC

MBNA - refund £341 offered-sent letter requesting refund of £3846.59 charges!!!!!!

Capital One-going to issue MCOL for £1243!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Louisk - didn't you do well!!

I noticed from your impecable groundwork at #42 from Melanie Johnson "I also announced on 26 January that the Treasury would set new benchmark, CAT standard (cost, access, terms) mortgages for variable and fixed or capped interest rate mortgages. Although voluntary, these will provide a yardstick to help borrowers make better informed, confident mortgage choices and avoid products which have in some cases caused detriment in the past. It is expected that CAT standards will be finalised shortly, following discussions with the mortgage industry.

The FSA will embark on a formal consultation process in the early summer and will consult on detailed rules for mortgage regulations towards the end of the year. Unauthorised mortgage providers will need to apply to the FSA by the middle of 2001, and the FSA expects to have the new regime in place by the third quarter of next year. The Treasury is in frequent contact with the FSA to discuss how these matters are progressing. However, it will be for the FSA to decide whether to initiate investigations into particular areas or firms in the mortgage market, once it has the powers to do so.

In the meantime, all mortgage lenders in the non-status market have to comply with the guidelines issued by the Director General of Fair Trading in November 1997. These guidelines include the need for transparency in all dealings with potential and actual borrowers, and to ensure they do not engage in unfair business practices. Failure to comply with the guidelines could call into question a firm's fitness to hold a consumer credit licence."

Any idea what the actual outcome was on the 'transparency' aspect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DEATHLORD

has any one any more infor on the ecrs when there is a repo case, as I believe and by talking to a d/j that this puts a new light on it as you have broken a contract? and I have writeen before but no one has asnwer WHAT is the ecr for as if the Ken have said and I qoute,

ERC additionalintesetis changed in accordance with the mortgage terms as varied by the offer of mortgage' so what is it please some one ohhh tell as I fully believe its a: loss of profit or b: loss of interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Fantastic News!!!!!!!!!!

 

Congratulations

 

:D :D :D

 

I've changed your title to something more fitting.

I too hope those legal costs hurt.... it won't be the last they waste on defending claims!

 

Well done to you!

 

I'm thrilled!

 

 

 

Hi there..

 

first of all ,thank you very much for all the info that you provide on these forums ...my dilemma is as follows as far as the Mortgage comapnies are concerned;

 

how they can even contemplate of challenging any of us in Court when they know full well that;

 

1-they are covered by the same rules and regulations as the banks- and

credit card companies-as clearly indicated in the Customer Contract

regs...

 

2-they have charged us all along fees ,penalties and defaults well above what it costs them ,clearly they have been making huge profits-as much as up to 2000pct in most cases!as we all know that these silly letters etc..cost between 49 to 99 p each to produce!no wonder they do not want anybody else to know their cost disclosure!!!

 

so is there any reason why we may not take them to court.???..surely any even averagely intelligent judge would see through them at a stroke and

award the decision in our favour,specially when the media also gets hold of this sad story!

 

please enlighten us with your wisdom..

 

tks and God bless.

r.d

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1-they are covered by the same rules and regulations as the banks- and

credit card companies-as clearly indicated in the Customer Contract

regs...

 

The cheeky buggers have well written contracts with legal indemnity clauses and have big teams of barristers :D

 

2-they have charged us all along fees ,penalties and defaults well above what it costs them ,clearly they have been making huge profits-as much as up to 2000pct in most cases!as we all know that these silly letters etc..cost between 49 to 99 p each to produce!no wonder they do not want anybody else to know their cost disclosure!!!

 

Tell me about it! Silly letters tend to cost a tad more than 99p, The lassie from the whistleblower said about £2.

 

so is there any reason why we may not take them to court.???..surely any even averagely intelligent judge would see through them at a stroke and

award the decision in our favour,

Again, legal indemnity clauses, barristers, sneaky brained people!

Have a look at the threads were the judges have stuck claims out - however Tamadus and Mrs Foot seem to be leading the way with good judges at the minute

 

specially when the media also gets hold of this sad story!

I have written to every single magazine and newspaper in the county. I was in contact with the BBC ,as many on here will remember, the BBC thought it was too big a story to deal with.:(

 

Dont worry Rubber duck we will get them in the end its just going to take some planning. A lot is going on off the forum and when its time we will be told how to get them.

 

That's my tuppence worth.:D

 

Over to Zoot for more expert opinions!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deathlord I believe that if there is a repossession case erc's may not be chargable I also have been saying this for some time in my case I am getting legal opinion in the next week or so If all goes well I will be going for 13grand inerc and penalty charges but want to be clear on my gorunds first

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Tell me about it! Silly letters tend to cost a tad more than 99p, The lassie from the whistleblower said about £2.

 

 

She said no such thing. Do not fall into to the trap that so many have.

 

The reporter suggested "a couple of pounds maximum?"

 

and the Whistleblower confirm "Maximum"

 

A lie oft told becomes the truth.

 

Clearly these letters and our defaults do have a cost, but it is still far short of even £2.

 

Data processing is cheap, somewhere in the order of between 0.2 to 0.6 of a penny per record or between £2 and £6 per thousand records if done by an external company - and remember, these companies also make a profit on that too. The banks do it in-house and therefore enjoy cost savings there.

 

Then, if the bank send a letter (many do not) the paper and the envelope have a cost, as does the postage. Paper is around £3 per thousand sheets and white DL window envelopes are £11.49 per thousand from a well known stationery supplier, so it is doubtful the banks pay anything like this for their paper and envelopes.

 

So the total cost per letter? Approximately 1½ pence for the paper and envelope, 34 pence for postage and maybe ½ a penny to process the data. They are printed, folded and inserted by machine at a cost of a fraction of a penny each again, as the process is fully automated.

 

Still a long way short of the mythical £2 that was in fact, suggested by the reporter initially and then also stated by a junior manager at Barclays.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I appreciate that, but in fact what was stated was that it costs a maximum of £2 in some cases but in a great many cases much less than this as the process is almost entirely automatic.

 

There simply are not armies of operators sitting hunched over terminals keying in data all day to manually pay or decline cheques or DD's. Only in a small minority of cases does a person actually do anything - the vast majority of bounced payments are automatic.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

There simply are not armies of operators sitting hunched over terminals keying in data all day to manually pay or decline cheques or DD's.

 

 

LOL the images you've just put in my head with that!!!!!

 

 

It was 1 in the morning and I read rd's post as 9p not 99p. I do not remember the whistleblower word for word but I do remember reading Yoda's thread's about it. Regardless, I am not here to have my head jumped apon for trying to be nice and offer simplified advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless, I am not here to have my head jumped apon for trying to be nice and offer simplified advice.

 

LOL - I am not jumping on your head, but don't you see? According to the law the banks must only charge us the actual cost of each breach, they must not make a profit - even at £2 they are making a profit, we must not lie down so easily.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do see that! :D Its one of the reasons I am a member of CAG! Also one of the reasons I am trying to finding away to successfully claim ERC's back as well as trying to get media interest in them.

 

Must go, have a bank to tell off for sending statements to the wrong address.

 

 

Sorry for the hijack Louisk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The cheeky buggers have well written contracts with legal indemnity clauses and have big teams of barristers :D

 

 

 

Tell me about it! Silly letters tend to cost a tad more than 99p, The lassie from the whistleblower said about £2.

 

 

Again, legal indemnity clauses, barristers, sneaky brained people!

Have a look at the threads were the judges have stuck claims out - however Tamadus and Mrs Foot seem to be leading the way with good judges at the minute

 

 

I have written to every single magazine and newspaper in the county. I was in contact with the BBC ,as many on here will remember, the BBC thought it was too big a story to deal with.:(

 

Dont worry Rubber duck we will get them in the end its just going to take some planning. A lot is going on off the forum and when its time we will be told how to get them.

 

That's my tuppence worth.:D

 

Over to Zoot for more expert opinions!

 

 

Tks a lot for the info so far..one sticky poit for the intelligent barristers though...

does it matter how much of a legal indemnity clauses that they may have when what they do is plainly illegal hence the original contract is null and void??as they were supposed to deal with us honestly,with care...where??? i have not seen that at all from any of these big boys ...People like kensington deal with people who did have their problems in the past and trying to get back on track..but not only by charging higher-up to 50 pct more!-on their mortgages,they also punish them with all kinds of heresy,inuendo and superficial codswallop!..they are the first ones to breach their own contract anyway by delaing with us in a dishonest way!! please tell me which judge is gonna listen to them,except when striking claims out as a result of making mistakes on the procedures governing the technicalities of the mechanism of courts,not on the fundemental issue of dishonesty and lack of care.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your spot on there Rubber Duck. Kensington took us to court last September and the judge threw it out. He actually said to us "If you need any further assistance please feel free to contact the court". Thier representative could not supply the relevant documants whne asked to by the judge, she asked us if we had them! Like we're gonna supply her documents to help her case against us, stupid woman. Anyway, Kensington are getting their own back, since last Septmerber (7 months) we have had no fewer that 5 interest rate rises on our mortgage. It's now upto a staggering 9.45%(4% higher that BOE base rate) These people are parasites and we are desperate to get them out of our lives, but it cost us...............about 4 grand (ERC).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your spot on there Rubber Duck. Kensington took us to court last September and the judge threw it out. He actually said to us "If you need any further assistance please feel free to contact the court". Thier representative could not supply the relevant documants whne asked to by the judge, she asked us if we had them! Like we're gonna supply her documents to help her case against us, stupid woman. Anyway, Kensington are getting their own back, since last Septmerber (7 months) we have had no fewer that 5 interest rate rises on our mortgage. It's now upto a staggering 9.45%(4% higher that BOE base rate) These people are parasites and we are desperate to get them out of our lives, but it cost us...............about 4 grand (ERC).

 

 

Hi there..

i suggest.please please please,do not ditch them until you are free to do so..so they get no fees for early exit..they do not like that!..all in all even if you have to change to another company,the changeover fees etc is gonna cost you around 1500-2000 pounds..so save that and wait until you can leave without any punishment from the Draculaland!that is exactly what i am waiting for..ready in June -july sometimes...

but whatever happens i want everybody to sue them..the more the merrier...as the numbers starts to increase believe me their will to defend anything will be on the wane..then Bingo!They know we are right..but just delaying the inevitable so they can draw more interest from our funds in their hands...but not long now!

keep the faith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gang,

 

Well surprise, surprise Kennsington have still not paid up. In fact thay added a further £730.91 to my account in February - at least this time they had the decency to call them 'Solicitors Costs' all of this in direct violation of the tomlin order.

 

Wrote a letter to their solicitors giving them 7 days to sort it, reply from solicitor states ' administrative oversight ' 14 days later still waiting for ' administrative oversight ' to be corrected.

 

Question is ---- Is it time to send in the baliffs ? (oh I really hope so ),

 

I know kensington have some nice fancy offices in the Paddington area, what a dream it would be baliffs - newspaper reports - TV news crews - victims of kennsington - all there to see justice being done, what a show it would be, if it kicks off your all invited !

 

Advice please

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.’ Edmund Burke

 

Total unlawfully taken £3247 (NatWest)

Data Protection Act Sent 05/05/06

Full Response Received 15/06/06

Prelim. Sent 16/06/06

LBA Sent 30/06/06

MOL claim Started 26/07/06

Defence and CPR18 received 26/08/06

AQ Sent 15/09/06

Cobbets Offer Half 18/09/06

Offer Rejected 19/09/06

Court orders Stay 26/09/06

objection sent 29/09/06

Mission Accomplished 9/10/06 :-D

 

Total unlawfully taken £650 (Kensington)

MOL claim Started 26/07/06

Offer received 17/08/06 rejected.

Defence received 26/08/06

Court orders Stay 18/09/06

Objection Sent 23/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gang,

 

Well surprise, surprise Kennsington have still not paid up. In fact thay added a further £730.91 to my account in February - at least this time they had the decency to call them 'Solicitors Costs' all of this in direct violation of the tomlin order.

 

Wrote a letter to their solicitors giving them 7 days to sort it, reply from solicitor states ' administrative oversight ' 14 days later still waiting for ' administrative oversight ' to be corrected.

 

Question is ---- Is it time to send in the baliffs ? (oh I really hope so ),

 

I know kensington have some nice fancy offices in the Paddington area, what a dream it would be baliffs - newspaper reports - TV news crews - victims of kennsington - all there to see justice being done, what a show it would be, if it kicks off your all invited !

 

Advice please

 

 

Dear Louisk....

 

please..pleasse..please..do it!

i ,and the thousands of others are waiting in hope!..pleaseeeee!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, 21 days and still no money! Do you think they would wait that long for you to pay up?

 

of course not.!

 

can you also imagine the noise that it will create in the media and the industry as a whole??..hopefully afterwards we can take them on,on our own terms...at the end ;we need mortgages,they need a return for their money,as long as we are all honest with each other...there is no problem,is there?...this whole issue is not of earning a decent profit for these companies-as shown by them so far!-but how much they can squeeze us for!..similiar situation happened with car companies for so many years now..they toe the line!(they are still making money on over-priced spare parts now, but this is another issue for another day!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can any1 answer this,

 

I had an account with the dreadful kensington and thankfully I paid it off but did rack up a serious amount of charges if I no longer have the account can I still claim back £50 per month arrears fees etc, does any1 know. they are the worst biggest bunch of w**kers i have ever had the misfortune to have become involved with and now im going to try and get my own back against them and their equally as unplesent assosiate Derbyshire home loans, can any1 offer any guidance on what fees are applicable if at all. and can I claim if the account is closed???

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes yes and yes! Have a look in Zoots sricky Mortgage FAQS I seem to remember there being a list of claimable charges in there.

 

As long as its small claims size you should be fine, they haven't managed to use their legal indemnity clause in the small claims but as you can see from this thread, they do try!

 

Send off your SAR and get all the details first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...