Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Whatever the nuances of the law, they will be lost on OPS, who like the rest of the PPcs never bother to get planning permission, ever. When they get a new contract they don't want to delay issuing PCNs by deigning to follow the law, especially as the period when they take over and the parking restrictions are new is the time when they can catch most drivers out.
    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cardiff directions hearings *POST HERE*


claret74
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5837 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've sent the draft directions that Garyh gave on page 1 of this thread and the letter that Welshcakes gave on page 10 thread 199. I sent a copy to both Thomas Hickey and the court by recorded delivery. Do i need to send anything else or is that ok . I intend to go on the day.

Thanks Linda

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 854
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi All,

 

I am in the same position as kalujo123 it would appear.

 

I did all the standard stuff; request statements, send letters and then MCOL. Barclays filed at last minute. It went to Northampton and then got transferred to Cardiff for directions on the 14th August.

 

Since returning the completed questionnaire to the court I have not sent anything else to anyone... I am panicking now as it appears that people are sending all sorts as well as having contact with BLT.

 

I do not know who is dealing with my case either!

 

I started my own thread here and am following the Cardiff thread

 

:oops::-?:Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

After reading a thread posted by Emma81 on the Lloyds Tsb website I have phoned Cardiff this morning and they have confirmed that all cases on the 14th August at 10.30 including mine have been stayed. They confirmed that they would not be arranging another hearing until after the high court ruling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

After reading a thread posted by Emma81 on the Lloyds Tsb website I have phoned Cardiff this morning and they have confirmed that all cases on the 14th August at 10.30 including mine have been stayed. They confirmed that they would not be arranging another hearing until after the high court ruling.

Take no notice until you get confirmation from the judge. If you recieve an staying order you should apply to set-aside. If not, turn up (or write in if you were given the option) as planned and be prepared to argue against it.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading a thread posted by Emma81 on the Lloyds Tsb website I have phoned Cardiff this morning and they have confirmed that all cases on the 14th August at 10.30 including mine have been stayed. They confirmed that they would not be arranging another hearing until after the high court ruling.

 

Same here, I just called and got same advice. To the effect that all cases on the 14th have been stayed and there will be a notification posted to all claimants.

 

I asked if I could oject, the guy said yes you can send in an objection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm then, I need not send the objection for stay letter in until the case has actually been stayed??

 

I wil not be attending but have sent all relavent documentation in for directions etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just ramg them myself ours is gonna be stayed as well. has anyone heard of the stays being lifted yet when the objections are raised?

I know i,m echoing what every1 else is saying but what a jip my claim isnt even against one of the 8 named banks and yes the first letter of banks is a typo should be a W :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kashie

 

Don't send in a Stay Objection unless you get written notice from the court that your claim has been stayed.

 

Not all claims can or will be Stayed, mine for example isn't even about bank charges, it's a DPA breach so the judge will be looking at each claim to allocate it court ordered Stay or Not.

 

Don't presume anything, get the facts about your claim before acting and please, if you don't receive official notice of a Stay, attend on the 14th otherwise you seriously risk jepordising your own claim.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll need to formally apply for the stay to be lifted, unless you don't mind having your claim on hold indefinately, of course!

 

You obviously can't do this until you get the staying order through though.

 

You'll need form N244 and attach the stay removal template as part C - http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_0400.pdf

 

Further guidance see here -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/108430-stays-info-guidance.html

 

If you do not recieve a staying order, continue to the hearing as normal.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice all. another quick question about the directions hearing on the 14th. Is it possible for the judge to stay the case if wragge dont comply with his original instructions. He asked for in his instruction that both parties submit 7 days before the hearing :-

 

1. Directions will be given in this case by the Designated Civil Judge, His Honour Judge G Hickinbottom, on the 14th August 2007 at 10.30am at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, 2 Park St, Cardiff Cf10 1ET.

 

2. The parties may appear in person or make written representations as to how the case should proceed provided a copy of the representations is sent to the court and the other side at least 7 working days prior to the hearing.

 

I have sent in my letter and draft instructions as per the order but so far the other side havent. if on friday they still havent even if i receive a stay notification can i ask that the defence be struck out because they didnt comply with the order? might be grasping at straws here but u never know

cheers in advance (again)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicki

 

The Defendants haven't done anything wrong, the order doesn't require submission of written representations, it merely gives the option to submit instead of appearing in person.

 

"2. The parties may appear in person or make written representations as to how the case should proceed provided a copy of the representations is sent to the court ....."

 

Theonly way you will have grounds for Strike Out is if they don't turn up on the day.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok another quick Q if you do not mind....

 

As we have heard it is likely that the majority of cases will be stayed on the 14th, if like me you have not submitted a written representation as you were intending on appearing on the day - should we now consider a written representation (quickly) including the objection?

 

?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi welshcakes

 

i assume the strikeout would only be viable if i dont actually receive a stay order between now and the 14th as well? have you heard or read about anyone being successful in having the stay lifted after objecting?

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok another quick Q if you do not mind....

 

As we have heard it is likely that the majority of cases will be stayed on the 14th, if like me you have not submitted a written representation as you were intending on appearing on the day - should we now consider a written representation (quickly) including the objection?

 

If your attending just take the statement with you and be prepared to argue against a stay at the hearing.

 

Anyone who is not attending should include the fact that they object to any possible stay in their written representations for how the claim should proceed.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many claimants have been succesful in lifting stays. In fact I got one lifted at an application hearing last September.

 

The big difference of course is that back then everyone knew it was highly likely that the proposed Mercentile test cases would never go ahead, and therefore any stay is pointless, which turned out to be correct. This time the test case is partially at least at the banks behest, so you can't argure that its unlikely ever to be heard, becouse it clearly will be.

 

Forget the strike out. Your main concern is your claim proceeding rather than being stayed.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I'm aware from my conversation from the court all claims due for direction hearing at Cardiff have been stayed as of today.....this is a court order so you can't just turn up on the 14th as their won't be a hearing.

 

only option is to apply to have it set aside once the order is received. their is a fee for this and you then have to set out arguments in front of judge why it should be set aside. I believe it is extremely unlikely that any stays will be set aside (unless claimant terminally ill or near bankruptcy) as this order as been made by the court on their own initiative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I'm aware from my conversation from the court all claims due for direction hearing at Cardiff have been stayed as of today.....this is a court order so you can't just turn up on the 14th as their won't be a hearing.

Correct. If you recieve a staying order, all you can do is apply to set it aside. If you don't however, you should proceed as normal.

I believe it is extremely unlikely that any stays will be set aside (unless claimant terminally ill or near bankruptcy) as this order as been made by the court on their own initiative.

Not correct. The chances of success are not clear but there is certainly a reasonable chance at least, and there are very good grounds for your claim to proceed. The fact that the orders are made of the courts own initiative is irrelevant.

 

Also, any credit card, business, store card, DPAR, etc claims are not effected by the test case and therefore the stays. If you're claim is one of these and it gets stayed then it'll most likely be in error and you should apply for its removal solely on the grounds that the test case has no relevance whatsoever to your claim.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that there are going to be hundreds of very angry claimants around South Wales in the next couple of days. Maybe we should all turn up on the day anyway to show our disgust at our treatment... as well as submitting objections to the stay.Do they really expect us to sit down and wait months when we have already been waiting so long?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...