Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hey guys,   Have an update with regards this SAR claim.   Mum received this letter dated 24th of April on the 2nd of May....  bit cheeky giving her only a few days to submit to their fear tactics!! Also, nothing has been received with regards to the lost case against parkingeye hmm maybe due to their delays??   Hope all are well!!   Kind regards,   Screenshot_20240502_185546_WhatsApp.pdf
    • Similar to what you've said here, just get drafting up based on what's already been sent. The mentions of the CRA2015 will be key. post your draft up here and we can help tweak.
    • Yes, well done. If you have a look at post 9 of dbuk2000's thread there are links to other cases featured on the Parking Prankster's site  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466177-ukpc-2x-windscreen-pncs-claimform-forgot-permit-appealed-res-parking-my-own-space-east-croft-house-86-northolt-road-south-harrow-ha2-0es-claim-dismissed/#comments Also have a read of dbuk2000's Witness Statement.  
    • PDF's now merged above... Plus extra redaction!
    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mcol form


bluedannyw
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just having a look at mcol form and see you can only fit 1000 characters on there. I see on the mcol template it shows all the points bunched up together. Is this ok? Don't want to mess up when i come to do my claim. And i would have to drive 20 odd miles to get a n1 form each time i start a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't drive 20 miles - get one here

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n1_0102.pdf

 

Far better than MCOL in my opinion - just send it to your local court (along with the charges spreadsheet) and Bob is your Dad's brother (so to speak) :p

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Hi there,

 

The link Jonni gave you is great and here is the link to the template to follow for guidance.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

You can also post the completed N1! With a cheque and just remember to post 3 copies of everything.

 

N1 is really the preferred way to go and I think personally, the best.

 

With the particulars of claim - as it does not fit in the box on the online form jonni gave you, you can just put the words "as attached", and from the template link above, copy and paste the particulars of claim into a word document.

 

It all looks nice and neat then and professional.

 

Money claim is always an option - but give me the old fashioned tried and well tested method any day.

 

All the best,

 

CJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks jonni and chloe, just looked at the 2 links. Where the n1 form template shows at the court, but on pdf it says in the. Is this the same? Also at the bottom of the form it says the court office at , does this update when you put in court name? Also can you send to the court coz on other threads people say you have to hand in the form at the court? Sorry if i'm being thick but its late and can't use form correctly at moment as only on my mobile phone! Thanks again for the help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Hi there,

 

To find your local court click here -

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/HMCSCourtFinder/

 

1) On the top right is the box where you put just the court name (in the)

 

2) The bottom left of the form - is where you put the defendents name and address - no it does not update from where you have written it further above.

 

3) You can hand it in or you can POST IT!!

 

ATTACH TO THIS FORM:-

 

Schedule of Charges

 

COPY THREE TIMES (FORMS AND SCHEDULE) and hand in or post to your local COUNTY COURT with the appropriate FEE

 

Then you are done! Hope this answers your questions.

 

CJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Chloe.

 

sorry to be a pain, but the bit at the bottom I referred to was the small print where it says - The court office at then there is a space before the next line says opening times.

Do I put Cambridge County court in there? The same as top of sheet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let them fill it in..... even the space at the top if you like.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...