Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes you should take this view, but this is nothing to worry about you will be fine. you have a very well edited WX im sure although I haven't actually looked at it because I can't seem to work out which one is the new one anymore, although I do remember something previously. however if i remember it right its just a lost parcel via packlink and no insurance which frankly is pretty straightforward and should be a copy of farooq v evri. Have I understood the case right? Please tell me if not as there is rather a lot on this forum
    • well in every other thread advocate or not evri always send a cpr27.9 because they never turn up. I don't think we've seen a thread here without one. Maybe @BankFodder can tell me if i've missed one, but all of the ones I can remember there has been a cpr 27.9 notice even when an advocate has attended and from my own knowledge also I've always had CPR 27.9 advocate or not. I dont think there is a single thread on this forum where evri have shown up themselves and similarly I don't think there is a single thread where they dont send notice (aside from this)
    • OK, thanks.  Jake Burgess is well known to us - and well despised. Friday would be great as then there would be the weekend to tweak things. 👍
    • Thanks FTMDave.  VCS's WS was from Jake Burgess.  I will draft my WS and share with copies of court order, and VCS's exhibits asap.  I'm away tomorrow so more likely Friday.  Thanks again for the advice   
    • Thanks. Time to move on this. 1.  You need to tweak the magnificent WS that dx suggested.  Adapt it to your case.  It should take you about half an hour (I recently wrote a WS from scratch during a train journey which wasn't optimum 😂 with lots of cross referencing and it took me an hour an half, you have one already cooked thanks to dx). 2.  We will add bits to ridicule VCS's WS - it's rich that they moan about your defence being standard when their Particulars of Claim are too and also include the rubbish about keeper/driver that has been criticised numerous times by the courts. 3.  Who wrote their WS?  Was it Mohammed Wali or Ambreen Arshad or have they got someone new? 4.  We need to see a good chunk of VCS's exhibits.  I don't get why we have to keep asking you for things rather than them being volunteered.  Isn't it obvious that we can't help you compile a decent WS if we can't see what the other side is arguing?  All their silly signs aren't needed, but any contract with the landowner is important as are all the photos of your vehicle. 5.  You've never shown us the court order which fixes the hearing date.  It should be obvious we need to see what the court has ordered.  This is the second time we've asked. 6.  VCS were using Elms Legal.  Are Elms Legal still involved? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

b,card offer £12 per original fee as goodwill gesture...what now?


reesdance1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all can someone please give me a copy of a letter requesting my statements under the data protection act to send to barclaycard aswell as an address . is it the same format as bank charges? cant find anything in the forums(altho prob staring me straight in the face):confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

hi all i have received all my statements from barclaycard,please can someone tell me what charges i can actually claim for as listed on my statements,and what interest?when i have done this what letter do i send them,is the procedure the same as bank charges as i made a successful claim against natwest,or are there different letters for b,card :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi all i received a letter from barclaycard today saying they disagree with my legal analysis in my first letter to reclaim my charges,but are wiilling to put this aside without admission of liability anf offer me the difference between the £12 fee and the original £20 fee which amounts to £96 of the £296 im claiming for,and to top it all they have already credited my account with this before i had a chance to reply.Has anyone else had this happen and can anyone advise me on what to do now as i am determined they should be paying up the full amount :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a normal response from B'card.

Now then you need to write to them and say that you'll accept the £96 as PART PAYMENT of the claim.

Also the OFT's report from 2006 DIDN'T say that £12 was acceptable, just that they won't investigate charges below this level.

Remember the OFT doesn't make laws and as such continue with your claim.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ive copied letter 1,and sent it today,hopefully they will comply. Has anyone received the full amount by doing this or does it generally proceed to court from here on in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Wife had this, we wrote back saying we accepted this as part payment, and told them we wanted the rest. she received another letter just saying the same thing again. We have been on holiday since and only recently got back so need to follow this up, somehow...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

i sent the rejection letter to barclaycard and they have now written to say that when i opened my b.card acc i signed and agreed to the t & c's which included details of charges. basically they are not going to pay me the full amount and that is that. can anyone tell me if my next step is to send them a letter before action now,or do i just accept their offer of £96 of a £276 claim. im not sure what to do. are they just trying to intimidate me into giving in :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they are trying to intimidate you! Stick to your original timetable of letters and send the next one in when their time is up. Keep us informed!

HSBC:

Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 23/5

Prelim request sent 18/8 - ignored

LBA sent 6/9 - offer made, but it's not good enough!

Full offer received 19/9/06 :D

 

 

Barclaycard:

Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 23/5

Info dating back to May 2004 received 3/6

40 day deadline is up on 4/7

Information Commissioner had to intervene, got most of the statements I asked for but some still missing.

19 March 2007 Starting on them PROPERLY (at last!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks ,only just learning to find my way around the site,will stick to one thread from now on:o

Think i should send LBA to b.card as the rejection letter although threatens court proceedings is predominantly about rejecting the offer,what do you think cos thier time limit is already up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you let them, they will write and write until you get fed up and give up.... If you have sent them 2 letters asking for full amount and allowed a month for settlemnt from your 1st request, then sue them, that will sharpen their minds wonderfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same problem, offered me £312 when I was claiming £840.00. Sent a rejection letter straight back, but they credited my CLOSED barclaycard with this money. So, I have this £312.00 on an account and don't even have a card to spend it. Got another letter acknowledging my rejection but nothing about the balance offered! Nevermind, logged with MCOL yesterday. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...