Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Banks in court 05/04/07


veilside01702
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

SOUTHEND ON SEA.....

I have just been advised that a number of test cases are being heard at Southend on sea, court on 5th April 2007.

Apparently the court has had enough of the banks settling prior to court action...

I am going to find out when these are happening and try and go to see the outcome.......

I will find out and post with as much info as possible....

If the banks lose in court....does that mean a precident was set?????

 

As Natwest haven't filed a defence through cobbetts in my case.....and tomorrow is their last day to do this....

Courts shut at 12 tomorrow due to Easter.....so I am going to drop the request for judgement in when they close.....so it will be waiting for the court on tuesday when they re-open after easter.....

So could be bailiffs going into Natwest to get my money......Local newspapers will be informed.....lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh goody, that be the judge i saw then i exepct, he wasnt happy with several asepcts of the banks behaviour that day.

 

As to a test case, the banks are likley to settle prior to the hearing or give in when they attend at least this is what has happened histroically.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these test cases in the Small Claims or fast track??

 

I wouldn't get to excited about Cobbets.. They will file a defence at the last minute, and even if they don't applying for judgement may not do you any favours. The chances are they will apply for the case to be set aside, which will drag it all that little bit longer...

 

Just don't be to hasty..

 

Jos

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Glen and josamolly,

I was getting carried away thinking I may get paid out quickly....lol

As for the court cases tomorrow they are behind closed doors, results posted by court on tuesday.....

I guess they will all pay out before....lol

Anyone help on my letter to Natwest/cobbetts and the court please??

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/79795-urgent-advice-needed-letter.html

 

thanks....

Russ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do as Josa says and hang fire till next tuesday at least. Cobblers have until this next tuesday to get their defence in, on my case, and havent as yet, although I do expect they will at last second. But its not always best to jump straight in and go for judgement. Read up on the cases where its best to wait a few days to show youve allowed them even longer, etc. etc. it tends to look better in your favour rather than go for judgement on day 1 when you can. Last thing you want is for a further delay and set aside or stay.................. give em 3/4 more days extra before rushing for judgement........ Only my opinion, but thats what Im gonna do. Fendy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

veilside

 

as josamolly mentioned there is a high probability that cobbetts will file a defence (cobbetts faxed there defence in my case on the last day) so calm down and wait to see what happens,u have plenty of time to write letters to the court & cobbetts so hang fire for now as mistakes can cost you time & money

 

be patient & be wise my friend

 

u will get your money but they may well drag the time out

 

hope this helps

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

What gives you the impression these are test cases?

 

I doubt that very much. For a start they aren't even in the Mercantile Court.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called the court about my case today and the person in charge there told me they have a number of "test cases" being heard in private chambers tomorrow. I was told that the magistrates had got sick of the bank settling and were interested in actually hearing the cases to make judgements....

I was told they were being impartial but they felt the banks are abusing the system....

I am only going by what they told me today....lol

I was also told that I can find out the rulings from tuesday, due to the easter holiday....

But wasn't allowed to attend due to the sensitive details being discussed!!

Or the claimants account details....lol

You never know....they might actually turn up.....(Me thinks Not!)

They will do sooner or later.....

Russ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...