Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • lookinforinfo
      ECP ANPR PCN - Sainsburys, Whitechapel, London

      By lookinforinfo · Posted

      It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • gigglemal
      Ird/J&P - Letter Of Claim - old Emirates NBD debt

      By gigglemal · Posted

      Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • MrChips69
      31J Entering and stopping in a box junction when prohibited - Putney High Street Jct. Norroy Road SW15 1 RR

      By MrChips69 · Posted

      Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
    • ffc1991_
      Driving disqualification through x2 MS90 was unaware of - failure to identify but not the org speeding? sent Statutory Declaration to the court? - help

      By ffc1991_ · Posted

      Yeah only £10 so may as well just get it done. When it comes to liaising with the police and bargaining before it hopefully goes to court. How does that happen? Via email? Phone call etc
    • dx100uk
      Idr/J&P Emirates NBD - credit card in Dubai

      By dx100uk · Posted

      J&P are solicitors not a diff DCA.

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

As28 V Hsbc

AS28

By AS28
in HSBC Bank

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6243 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

AS28

AS28

Posted
Posted

Hi guys, i have received a letter from DG Yesterday along with a "General form of Judgement or order", It states that i have to serve a detailed schedule of the penalty charges by 4pm on the 27th. Is this the schedule with the interest included? and do i have to file a copy to the court?

Help needed thanks, Al

Link to post
Share on other sites
nettyg

nettyg

Posted
Posted

i haven't heard of this form before but i assume it would mean that you have to send a copy of your schedule of charges incuding the interest to dg and the court - did you send one to the court when you filed your claim??

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites
lateralus

lateralus

Posted
Posted

i suspect you may have started with mse? or bbc? their advice is a tad misleading - at least for what hsbc expects.

i'm guessing you have filed your claim.

the charges need to be in the form of a list (ideally, the spreadsheet, but a list will do - no statements) and on the list must be each charge - starting with the oldest first

so it's date......name of charge (as per statement i.e.total charges).....

the amount of the charge.......and amount of interest @ 8% as figured by either the simple spreadsheet or the interest rate calculator which figures the 8% from the date of each charge to the date you filed the claim.

 

then a total at the bottom. that's what you are claiming for.

 

so, i believe that's what they are asking for -

is that not what you sent them?

you should send it to dg and also to the courts to be attached to your claim with your claim number on it.

and it must be done straight away - send it recorded delivery - and be sure it's there by friday.

ok? if you don't get any of what i've put there - get back and i'll clarify.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AS28

AS28

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I didn't send one no, I did think that i needed to but wasn't sure. I did my claim with money claim online, I got a notice of issue. Then i got a Notice of Acknowledgment. Then a Notice of Transfer of Proceedings (this is when they filed a defence), Now I have the General Form of judgment or order.

Link to post
Share on other sites
lateralus

lateralus

Posted
Posted

so, you've not sent a schedule of charges or breakdown at all -

make sure it is in an acceptable format as outlined above and get it sent.

 

are you sure the judgment order was from dg - i think i would have been from the court - but regardless send two copies to the court and one to dg tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AS28

AS28

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I have sent the list of charges to hsbc with the letter requesting repament of charges, then sent one with the lba. I will get the schedules off in the post (recorded delivery) One to the court and one to DG.

Oh have you ever heard of a charge for Card misuse???

Link to post
Share on other sites
jowalshy

jowalshy

Posted
Posted

Charge for Card misuse is when you use your debit card and it puts you over your o/d limit. (send 2 copies of your schedule of charges to court asking them to attach it to your claim and one to DG)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Castlebest

Castlebest

Posted
Posted

We often see people asking why they need to send a copy of their schedule to DG as HSBC already have it. I suspect DG actually don’t get any information at all from Colin Langdales department in Leeds, they work purely from what we and the court send them.

Obviously to do anything, most importantly make you an offer DG need to know exactly what you are asking for, this is why we recommend you send a copy of your schedule as soon as you have received your acknowledgment of claim. I would send them and the court copies of your schedule ASAP.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
AS28

AS28

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeah guys!

Had post from DG today, They are settling up!!! I won!!! just £124 short, it falls out of the 6 year time limit. Not too woried though.

Thanks for all of your help!

Al

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...