Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hobnail you don't know Elms too well yet. I am surprised that they got as close as they did to adding up to 30. I think the poor dears get confused because most other letters they send out are to give 28 days notice. They even  have difficulty with their two times table and often consult with the char lady to confirm that 2 plus 2 equals 4.  Just act on the notion that they are total numpties and you won't be far out.
    • To carry on from the above post it may be helpful to go through their WS using their numbers. 9] motorists do NOT accept the contract when entering the land. First they have to read it and understand it and then they realise that a] "No stopping" is prohibitive and cannot offer a contract. b] the signs around the bus stop do not mention who issued the No Stopping signs so it could not have been issued by VCS since the IPC CoP states that their signs should include the IPC logo and the creditor be identified.  10]There is no mention of £100 charge for breaching the No stopping request or if there is it is far too small to read even for a pedestrian. 11] no matter how often VCS say it, it is NOT a contractual clause   22]" the claimant has given the Defendant its contractual licence to enter the site". No it hasn't. This is a road leading to the airport. All sorts of people are going to the airport-travellers, taxis, fuel bowsers, airport staff, companies delivering food and drink for each aircraft, air traffic controllers, buses. It is absolutely ridiculous to attribute VCS wth any sort of permissions. The land owners yes, but not VCS . There can be no sort of analogy between a car park and a major thoroughfare where VCS have no place as it is not relevant land.   23] there can be no contract as there is no offer only a prohibition. And it is not relevant land no matter how Mr Walli attempts to prove otherwise. 25] VCS may have won a few times but none quoted was on an airport covered by the RTA and its own Byelaws. They also have lost more cases than they have won using their prohibitive signs. 26] First one has to consider if there is a contract. Is it relevant land? No. Does a valid contract exist betweer VCS and Peel? NO.  27] the signage at the bus stop may show the conditions ie  no stopping, and restricted zone but not the terms ie is there a charge for stopping and who is the creditor. The last section of the sign is illegible  29] already stated that a WS between VCS and peel is not a valid document 31] it will need more than the Claimants feather to outweigh the case against the Defendant no matter who was driving. 32] there is no law of agency involved. This is not a case of employer/employedd relationship. VCS are muddying the waters because they have no way of transferring the driver's liability to the keeper 33] this a red herring. There is no list of highways at all  on the Highways act 1980 so this is a deliberate strategy to debunk the fact that this road is not relevant land. VCS are put to strict proof that it is relevant land not covered by the Road Traffic Act nor by Byelaws. 34] there ican be no comparison between a railway station and an airport. Totally fatuous analogy.  35] yes the landowners can bring in their own terms but what the cannot do is overrule Byelaws and the Road Traffic Act. 39] surely the paralegal cannot be that ignorant of PoFA. If Bye Laws are involved then the bus stop is not relevant land and so the specious argument about FGW is rubbish   36] what on earth is he talking about with Permits. There is no mention of permits on the signage and even if there were  would it mean that Permit holders were allowed to stop on No Stopping roads? There are enough examples on CAG to counter act their idiocy on continuing charging the extra £60   46] VCS had NO reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA for the Defendants details. No valid  contract with the landowners No stopping is prohibitive therefore cannot form a contract the event happened on a bus stop over which VCS has no jurisdiction the signage either does not show that there was a charge of £100 for stopping, or the font size was too small for a motorist to be able to read it  the signage does not show the Creditor which fails the IPC CoP so not valid the WS contract does not appear to authorise VCS to pursue motorists to Court Given all these factors it seems that VCS have breached the GDPR of the Defendant quite substantially and it would appear right that an exemplary award is made against VCS in the hope that they will drop all further cases at Doncaster airport where they are pursuing motorists on non relevant land.   48] what is this guy on? You weren't in a car park you were on a bus stop 59] this case is totally without merit. I am not surprised that the paralegal will not be turning up. Some statements are pretty close to perjury and others are designed to mislead or misdirect. None of the analogies seem appropriate or relevant. Could have been said in at least half the time without the repetition and trying to make a case where none was there. One particularly bad example of misdirection was in the photographs. The Clearway sign shown near the bus stop is very unclear  unlike the Clearway sign two photos before it which may well include terms and conditions. The one by the bus stop is totally different.      
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote...   your defence doesnt need any return of docs.. carefully read what has been posted here and in the other threads i pointed to in your old thread merged here too.   redwood/harwood or STA or brachers.   just use our enhanced google search box.   uni fees is useful too.   this guy is just in front of you    
    • Tech firm CEO Jeff Lawson warns bosses not to make hasty judgements about their employees.View the full article
    • I have just spent last few hours registering and signing up and filling in all the details.   Below is a POC I have drafted.   The defendant is a parcel delivery company DPD (UK) LIMITED On 09/08/2021 the defendant agreed to deliver the claimant's parcel containing a PlayStation 5 Disc Version value £530, to an address in the UK. The delivery fee of £7.79 was paid by the claimant. Parcel tracking number: ???????? Parcel reference no: ????????? The defendant failed to deliver the parcel and have reported it as lost on 20/08/2021. The defendant refuses to refund the full value of the item and the delivery fee. The claimant seeks £530 being the value of the item, £7.79 delivery cost and legal fees.        (Sorry for being stupid but this POC is supposed to go where it says    " Claim details Why you believe you’re owed the money: " right? Reason why I'm asking is because I don't see anywhere it specifically says what are your particulars of claim)   Tomorrow being the 15th day, I will be ready to click it off (assuming the POC is ok)    I have read a few more hermes/packlink etc stories where they were resolved and gives me hope I will regain my lost money.  Will carry on reading up as much as I can.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

As28 V Hsbc


AS28
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5263 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, i have received a letter from DG Yesterday along with a "General form of Judgement or order", It states that i have to serve a detailed schedule of the penalty charges by 4pm on the 27th. Is this the schedule with the interest included? and do i have to file a copy to the court?

Help needed thanks, Al

Link to post
Share on other sites

i haven't heard of this form before but i assume it would mean that you have to send a copy of your schedule of charges incuding the interest to dg and the court - did you send one to the court when you filed your claim??

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i suspect you may have started with mse? or bbc? their advice is a tad misleading - at least for what hsbc expects.

i'm guessing you have filed your claim.

the charges need to be in the form of a list (ideally, the spreadsheet, but a list will do - no statements) and on the list must be each charge - starting with the oldest first

so it's date......name of charge (as per statement i.e.total charges).....

the amount of the charge.......and amount of interest @ 8% as figured by either the simple spreadsheet or the interest rate calculator which figures the 8% from the date of each charge to the date you filed the claim.

 

then a total at the bottom. that's what you are claiming for.

 

so, i believe that's what they are asking for -

is that not what you sent them?

you should send it to dg and also to the courts to be attached to your claim with your claim number on it.

and it must be done straight away - send it recorded delivery - and be sure it's there by friday.

ok? if you don't get any of what i've put there - get back and i'll clarify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't send one no, I did think that i needed to but wasn't sure. I did my claim with money claim online, I got a notice of issue. Then i got a Notice of Acknowledgment. Then a Notice of Transfer of Proceedings (this is when they filed a defence), Now I have the General Form of judgment or order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, you've not sent a schedule of charges or breakdown at all -

make sure it is in an acceptable format as outlined above and get it sent.

 

are you sure the judgment order was from dg - i think i would have been from the court - but regardless send two copies to the court and one to dg tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you follow the mse site it just tells you to use the calculator and then transfer the totals to the MCOL claim form. Saying that, it does tell you to send a list of charges to hsbc with the LBA.

It is a great site but could do with tweaking with regards what to send, when to send and to who!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Welcome to the Consumer Forums

Free advice and support to to solve your consumer problems.

You will soon discover what a friendly place this is and get lots of hints about standing up to consumer bullies or dealing with other consumer rights.

 

Which guide to the Sale Of Goods Act

 

New advice guide explains credit card rights

 

Help the CAG!!

Make a donation

 

ARE YOU A VICTIM OF COWBOY BUILDERS?

 

Has your RBS account been transferred to Santander?

 

Forum rules. Please read these before posting

 

PLEASE CHECK OUT THE CAG LIBRARY!! IT HAS LOADS OF USEFUL STUFF IN THERE. CLICK HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent the list of charges to hsbc with the letter requesting repament of charges, then sent one with the lba. I will get the schedules off in the post (recorded delivery) One to the court and one to DG.

Oh have you ever heard of a charge for Card misuse???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Charge for Card misuse is when you use your debit card and it puts you over your o/d limit. (send 2 copies of your schedule of charges to court asking them to attach it to your claim and one to DG)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

We often see people asking why they need to send a copy of their schedule to DG as HSBC already have it. I suspect DG actually don’t get any information at all from Colin Langdales department in Leeds, they work purely from what we and the court send them.

Obviously to do anything, most importantly make you an offer DG need to know exactly what you are asking for, this is why we recommend you send a copy of your schedule as soon as you have received your acknowledgment of claim. I would send them and the court copies of your schedule ASAP.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yeah guys!

Had post from DG today, They are settling up!!! I won!!! just £124 short, it falls out of the 6 year time limit. Not too woried though.

Thanks for all of your help!

Al

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...