Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Studio and the lost returned item


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I read the response given to turn 82, and following on from that.

 

My outstanding balance with Studio is £700 ish, of which £199 is indispute I refused the item in question did not sign for it or recieve a form from the delivery driver. He said I didnt need one (Foolish I know, but sometimes I trust people)

 

I havent payed them for two months, I can know pay some thanks to my Bank charges being paid back.

 

I want to claim my Admin and service charges from them ( roughly £300).

They have given me one more chance to phone them with a suitable repayment plan, before they start defaulting.

I'm still sending the CCA should I get in first?

 

What should I do, I'm in the same situation with Littlewoods £600, who I have also come to an agreement with but couldnt keep to because of the long wait for TSB to pay up.

 

All advice welcome:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say get your CCA's in - that will give you a little time to sort out what you want to do.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i worked for a courier company that used to deliver for studio.if you havent signed for it then they cant prove you had it.ask to see a copy of the delivery manifest

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i worked for a courier company that used to deliver for studio.if you havent signed for it then they cant prove you had it.ask to see a copy of the delivery manifest

 

Thanks for that, I will do, more good news Littlewoods have put my account on hold for a week they think I will refinance with their IBC department I'll get my letters in first.

 

Thank you both for your help:D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

has the 12 days gone yet for which they are supposed to give the agreement? if so id send them a letter explaining that they havent complied with your request and that they are now in default ,which means they arent supposed to ask for money on the account til they produe the agreement.they have a further 30 days after the original 12 after which they have committed an offence and should be reported to OFT or trading standards

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

By supplying a sample credit agreement, albeit without your signature, Studio have obliged with your CCA request as it is deemed a "true" copy. However were they to consider pursuing the debt through the courts they would have to produce the agreement with your signature on, which knowing Studio is highly unlikely. Therefore the debt is unenforcable through the courts but you are still liable for the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Today I recieved a letter from Studio enclosed is a sealed sample credit agreement, they seem to have removed the cost of the lost order.

They have not included anything with my signature on.

What should I do next?

 

It is entirely up to you what you do next, you can reclaim your charges to reduce the debt or send them this letter - amended obviously.

 

Dear Sir/MAdam

Your Ref:

I refer to your letter dated 2 October 2006, in which you supplied me with an unsigned copy of your standard credit agreement. The supply of this standard leaflet in no way satisfies my request for documentation for the debt you allege exists – and I therefore do not acknowledge any debt to your company. For ease of reference I enclose a copy of that letter.

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

You were in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, on 8th September 2006 and one month later on 8th October you were guilty of committing a criminal offence.

I expect to hear from you within 10 days of this letter, acknowledging that this debt is indeed unenforceable, else you leave me with no alternative but to contact Bolton Trading Standards, and any other relevant statutory bodies to advise them of your conduct.

In your letter dated 2 October 2006 you refer to a firm of collectors, I fully expect you to advise them that this alleged debt is unenforceable also.

 

Take note, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 12 days are up 3nd May, so I'll just sit and wait:-) Thanks

 

Littlewoods keep telephoning, I don't answer they have cashed the cheque but sent nothing in writing yet.

 

A quick update on littlewoods, they have been telephoning everyday, I have not answered.

Today I have recieved an ordinary monthly statement that has the £1 used as payment.

 

I now owe £650, £480 in arrears.

They have added £5 Admin Charge and £12 Extra Care Advantage.

 

Any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the 3rd may write them a nice letter explaining that they are now in default and can no longer ask for payment . explain that you sent a cca request in with the date u sent it or put a copy of the letter you sent in the letter.then tell them to remove your phone number from their records.also tell them that if they have no signed credit agreement then they do not have consent to process data about urself and u wish all data sharing to be stopped and to not conform with this request is a criminal offence

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Studio have sent me an LBA letter that states that if I dont contact them by 10 am Tue 12 June they will proced with legal proceedings at the county court.

 

So I am sending the letter tomorrow stating that they have now committed a criminal offence (CCA) as the 12 days plus the calender month are up on the 18th June.

 

Am I right or have I screwed up somewhere.

 

Bluuemoney

Link to post
Share on other sites

the criminal offence is after the 30 days is up but yes def send them a letter saying that with no CCA then it will be difficult to prove alleged debt as court will want to see the CCA also.and remind them that on the 18th you will be reporting them for criminal offence to OFT and tading standards

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must report them to Trading Standards and tell them that you have done so, as they were chasing you for a disputed debt too. Report them for committing the summary offence as well at the same time.

 

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

Good luck, regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...