Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anyone? True or False? Notices of Correction


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone!

 

Does anyone know whether it is better to have notices of correction on your credit file (e.g. to explain bad credit history) or not?

 

I have heard information either way....

 

Some people claim it is better as Creditors have to read your notices before making a decision i.e. they have to look at your credit file, they can't just run it through a credit scoring computer programme.

 

Others say it can be unhelpful as some creditor reject people outright if they find out they have notices of correction as it suggests they have been in trouble on some of their accounts.

 

Can anyone confirm either way???:-)

 

Many thanks!

user_online.gifreputation.gif vbrep_register("705837") report.gif progress.gifedit.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard that too - though the people I have spoken to from Experian say that they are read and taken into account in a positive light, but I guess they would say that, wouldn't they!

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard that too - though the people I have spoken to from Experian say that they are read and taken into account in a positive light, but I guess they would say that, wouldn't they!

 

Indeed they would, since if they were to suggest otherwise they would be in serious trouble with the ICO.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because it's now settled in full does not mean that the Default was not legitimate at the time. When was the Default issued? Had you received Notice under s.87 of the Consumer Credit Act (A Default Noice) before the Default was placed on your file?

 

If all the conditions were met, and you did owe the money, then the Default is on your file legitimately and will remain there for 6 years; as will the CCJ. The only way to remove a CCJ from your credit file is to have the Judgement Set Aside - i.e. cancelled. The only way to do this is to apply to the court on the basis that it was either incorrectly entered or that you were not given an opportunity to defend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, I am not disputing either the CCJ or the default, just had a note on my file to point out that two seperate entries on two seperate parts of my credit file relate to the same debt which has been paid in full.

 

Ahh - well, there's no NEED for the Notice of Correction to be there; but it doesn't hurt to have it there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I felt there was a need as the name of the default and the CCJ are not the same. Not sure if I should have it deleted now though, although to be fair i think it is the appearance of the ccjs and defaults on my file that lower my score, not my notice of correction *lol*

Link to post
Share on other sites

does anyone have a letter or some sort of template to explain your credit file. I want to do this as i am from Australia, I have been in the UK for 3 years now and my credit score is not the best but i earn an ok salary. Thanks.

Neil

 

I WON £530 - See how Here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/65986-neil-lloyds-tsb.html

If i have been helpful, please click my scales (bottom left!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there are any standard templates for this on here ( unless anyone knows better than me!! ) but you can contact the credit reference agencies directly and they will help you write something. It's usually best to contact all 3 ( Experian,. Equifax and CallCredit ) and there is no charge for the service.

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does thank you very much. I may sound dumb but isn't it them i am writing to about my credit file? Are you sayin they would help me in adding the notice of correction.

Neil

 

I WON £530 - See how Here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/65986-neil-lloyds-tsb.html

If i have been helpful, please click my scales (bottom left!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only people who can add a notice of correction to your credit report are the Credit Reference Agencies. A financial service provider will tell you nothing apart from the name and address of the CRA they used. If you wish to add a correction notice, write to the CRA's and ask them about their dispute procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...