Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • rather than reducing the levels of c02 and nox in the atmosphere A VERY large increase   Record-breaking increase in CO2 levels in world’s atmosphere | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Experts issue warning after finding global average concentration in March was 4.7ppm higher than same period last year Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...   Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...    
    • This is the info that I have. Name of seller... Thomas Stone. Reg LG51UOV Driven 109,000 2001 ford escort van 55 Price paid £500. (I know that that's stupidly cheap for a van, but my son wanted to take it apart, and put it to gether again) His address st margarates drive gillingham kent. We live swindon, so over 2 hours away. My oldest sons machanic inspected it . Sorry I don't know if I'm reading this right, but NSR wheel cylinder leaking NSR Shock mounting corroded  Rear cross member corroded  Rear number plate light missing Brake compressor valve seized Hand break cables insecure O/S Seal to floor repairs are very badly done Dash lights are painted out Bonnet ( This is all he wrote here.) Brake pipes are covered in black doodoo ( This is what the machanic wrote). My son asked Thomas Stone if it would need lots of work, for it to pass its next mot,  Thomas Stone said , " I can't see it needing mega amounts of work, for it to pass, it isn't rotten and it starts and drives ok, and the brakes work well".             
    • Alan Bates is in the Guardian today. Our Post Office victory is being twisted by those who don’t want to see its like again | Alan Bates | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Litigation funders didn’t ‘exploit’ subpostmasters, they helped us. Those who attack them have corporate interests at heart, says former subpostmaster...  
    • Appreciate your response BankFodder. I am aware that the Consumer Rights Act does not apply in my case as I operate a business and, instead, should rely on the Supply of Goods and Services Act and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. I was a little unsure as, when I read the judgement of Hashim Farooq v EVRi Parcelnet, July 2023 I presumed that,  as Farooq had supplied laptops through Amazon,  the Consumer Rights Act would not apply but the judge refers to it in Section 22 as to why the claimant should be given judgment. Have I read this correctly? The reason for not offering full reimbursement was because I did not take out insurance for the full value.  In regards to correspondence from my customer,  I have emails from her in my timeline stating that she was waiting all week and that no one attempted delivery.  I have no doubt that she will be willing to corroborate the events with a written statement.
    • When you post information here you will have to post it in single file multipage PDF format. Follow the upload link. However, it would be more helpful if you could simply answer the questions that we have put to you and we can deal with paperwork afterwards if we think we need it.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anyone? True or False? Notices of Correction


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6239 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone!

 

Does anyone know whether it is better to have notices of correction on your credit file (e.g. to explain bad credit history) or not?

 

I have heard information either way....

 

Some people claim it is better as Creditors have to read your notices before making a decision i.e. they have to look at your credit file, they can't just run it through a credit scoring computer programme.

 

Others say it can be unhelpful as some creditor reject people outright if they find out they have notices of correction as it suggests they have been in trouble on some of their accounts.

 

Can anyone confirm either way???:-)

 

Many thanks!

user_online.gifreputation.gif vbrep_register("705837") report.gif progress.gifedit.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard that too - though the people I have spoken to from Experian say that they are read and taken into account in a positive light, but I guess they would say that, wouldn't they!

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard that too - though the people I have spoken to from Experian say that they are read and taken into account in a positive light, but I guess they would say that, wouldn't they!

 

Indeed they would, since if they were to suggest otherwise they would be in serious trouble with the ICO.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because it's now settled in full does not mean that the Default was not legitimate at the time. When was the Default issued? Had you received Notice under s.87 of the Consumer Credit Act (A Default Noice) before the Default was placed on your file?

 

If all the conditions were met, and you did owe the money, then the Default is on your file legitimately and will remain there for 6 years; as will the CCJ. The only way to remove a CCJ from your credit file is to have the Judgement Set Aside - i.e. cancelled. The only way to do this is to apply to the court on the basis that it was either incorrectly entered or that you were not given an opportunity to defend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, I am not disputing either the CCJ or the default, just had a note on my file to point out that two seperate entries on two seperate parts of my credit file relate to the same debt which has been paid in full.

 

Ahh - well, there's no NEED for the Notice of Correction to be there; but it doesn't hurt to have it there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I felt there was a need as the name of the default and the CCJ are not the same. Not sure if I should have it deleted now though, although to be fair i think it is the appearance of the ccjs and defaults on my file that lower my score, not my notice of correction *lol*

Link to post
Share on other sites

does anyone have a letter or some sort of template to explain your credit file. I want to do this as i am from Australia, I have been in the UK for 3 years now and my credit score is not the best but i earn an ok salary. Thanks.

Neil

 

I WON £530 - See how Here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/65986-neil-lloyds-tsb.html

If i have been helpful, please click my scales (bottom left!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there are any standard templates for this on here ( unless anyone knows better than me!! ) but you can contact the credit reference agencies directly and they will help you write something. It's usually best to contact all 3 ( Experian,. Equifax and CallCredit ) and there is no charge for the service.

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does thank you very much. I may sound dumb but isn't it them i am writing to about my credit file? Are you sayin they would help me in adding the notice of correction.

Neil

 

I WON £530 - See how Here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/65986-neil-lloyds-tsb.html

If i have been helpful, please click my scales (bottom left!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only people who can add a notice of correction to your credit report are the Credit Reference Agencies. A financial service provider will tell you nothing apart from the name and address of the CRA they used. If you wish to add a correction notice, write to the CRA's and ask them about their dispute procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...