Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You probably do need to ignore it, but show it to us just in case. Cover up your name, address and anything that could ID you like your car reg. HB
    • Hi all! I've now had a "final notification letter" through from ECP. I assume I should continue to ignore this, but is there likely any action I need to take? Do you need to see a copy of the letter? Thanks
    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NatWest Charges- A guide


Guest NATTIE
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4670 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:eek: :o Hi Nattie

I have just recieved the 'Notice that Acknowledgement of Service had been Filed' from the court and NatWest are going to defend the claim. Stupid buggers! Anyway onward and upwards. getting a bit nervous now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thomass, Nattie has an n/a which means the username has been deleted. I wrote the charges guide to help people understand the charges that natwest make and to know the mechanisms of them. I felt that if you know how something works you will see when you look at the statements how the charge has been applied and by doing so be able to avoid them in the future. It would also have the effect of understanding to a point the mindset of the beast you are tackling.

I knew i would get one last chance on one of my own threads to answer a question. So thank you for posting and I am genuinely not being sarcastic.

NatWest or rather Cobbetts will defend but they will not win. Keep the chin up you will get something from customer relations unit giving you charges no interest. It is coincidence not stalling/delaying or even mindless delaying tactics. Be positive, Be prepared and follow the advice from this site and ask as many questions as you need. At the root of everthing this site is about is fighting for you rights. Good Luck and I hope someone will tell me when you win.

I came I saw I helped. I could do no more.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just starting looking at my NatWest. ALl is normal until late 2002 where I just get "charges" with no explanation. At first I get a separate £6 (the advantage gold bit) and a £20. Later on it's combined. I cannot work out what it is for.

 

S'okay...worked out it's unarranged borrowing fee now. I was expecting it to be labelled as such like the other charges are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my last post, I am doing NatWest again (first time was for £4052, they paid 2 weeks after my first letter) for only £600+. To my amazement, I had a letter from Mr Higley stating "given the work involved in assessing my claim they should be in a position to respond within 6-7 weeks."

 

Don't make me laugh. 2 weeks to sort out £4052, 6-7 weeks to sort £600+??? Mr Higley, if you are going to lie, make it convincing huh?

 

Anyhow, I have a new account with A&L, which is now in use. I have had a letter from the NW Birmingham Collections Centre saying I got 7 days to resolve my overdraft. Funny that the amount I am claiming will wipe the overdraft out. Where do I stand with them? Do I make an agreement and pay them £50 a month until its all clear? Tell them the account is going to lit and I cant do anything until its clear? Any advise would be great here guys.

 

Obviously this case is gonna go all the way through the courts like my wifes did with BB, but am used to that now, so not too bothered.

 

Should I shut my account down now or wait till paid out?

 

Also forgot to mention that I am on long term sick due to MS and am now on half pay from work.

 

By the way, if this post is in the wrong thread, please advise where to post this. Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Well, I have a thread on Advantage Gold and Unarranged borrowing which has within in charges that can be claimed but i felt an update on what the charges were and what can be claimed. This is a definitive guide.

 

Well the basics of charges is statements and knowing what the charge is for so we have 4 basic charges all claimable.

1) Unarranged Borrowing Fee-- This is when you have an overdraft or not and you go over that. The bank charges through charging periods which last a month and the charge goes out at the end of the month.

2) Unpaid Item- this appears on the statement and is when there is not sufficient funds in the account the previous working day(mon to Friday) to cover either a cheque, a direct debit or standing order to cover the amount going out. The bank "bounces" or does not pay the item and you get charged for it.

3) Card Misuse or Guaranteed Card Payment Fee(gtee card pymt)--This is when an item is paid by switch and goes through the account when the account is over its agreed or unagreed overdraft.

4) Referral Fee-- This is when an item is, rather than bounced is paid which takes the account over an agreed or unagreed overdraft by more than £26. 3 charges maximum a month on that last one.

5) Card Recovery Fee- This is when someone comes round to your house to recover your bank card

 

 

Please do not add more to this as i am adding more to this. but need to start it with explanations first.

 

OMG, do they really come to one's home + collect their card? phew!!!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]if my response has been of help to you, please click on my scales. thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Tigerbond - Welcome on board!

 

You may find it helpful to start a new thread of your own (e.g., tigerbond vs natwest) in the forum. Just scroll down the page and click on the 'new thread' button and enter your details! :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Not sure if this is the best thread to use, as there seem to be quite a few, and it may be that this is addressed elsewhere,

 

but,

 

surely the premium interest charged on un-arranged borrowing should be considered also as a penalty, as I doubt any there are any increased costs, or at least they are theoretical, and cannot be demonstrated by the banks either.

 

PS COuldnt see where/how to start my own thread! sorry.

 

Does any one know the position on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tender, welcome on board!

 

Have a look here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html on how to start a new thread of your own in the nat west/any other forum. Once you have your own thread, you'll be able to get advice and support specific to your own situation.

 

With regards to the interest charges by nat west on unarranged borrowing, I'd recommend you having a look through the threads in the general forum as this is where the 'contractual' interest (as it is known) is discussed. There have been some really interesting discussions going on for quite some time about this now - although only a handful of claimants have successfully managed to get the contractual interest back when they re-claim their charges.

 

Best of luck - hope to see more of you on the forum(s) soon. :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the interest charges by nat west on unarranged borrowing, I'd recommend you having a look through the threads in the general forum as this is where the 'contractual' interest (as it is known) is discussed. There have been some really interesting discussions going on for quite some time about this now - although only a handful of claimants have successfully managed to get the contractual interest back when they re-claim their charges.

 

hedgey06 et al

 

It's late and I might be getting myself in a muddle here but, surely, lots of people have succeeded in reclaiming the 'premium interest charged on unarranged borrowing'?

 

Most of the spreadsheets available via this website make allowance for reclaiming interest - at whatever rate - incurred as a direct result of the bank's unlawful charges.

 

Of course, some people, myself included, are hoping to claim compound interest on top of this. It is this which is altogether more complicated - indeed the consensus is that while Sempra provides a legitimate argument for CI on the basis of unjust enrichment, you are unlikely to get it at the bank's unauthorised rate - and, thus far, relatively few claimants have realised this goal.

 

Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
i too am in the process of reclaiming charges, and again NatWest are defending citing bigger charges???

 

Hi windymiller, welcome on board :)

 

The best thing for you to do at the moment is to start a new thread in this forum. Give as much detail as possible about your claim (without giving away too much personal information) and somebody should be able to advise you further.

 

Best of luck :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just taking a look at something that was written almost 2 years ago. Do you think this need to be given a shampoo and set?

This is only my second post of my reincarnation here. I will be updating the guide which is out of date and in point of fact is almost obsolete now, by the end of the week. The new guide is better and less cluttered.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello all,

 

Sorry if this has been asked before - newbie here. I am claiming charges back form NatWest and I'm unsure whether to incluse the following on my list:

 

1) OVERDRAFT ARRANGEMENT FEE

 

2) DAY/MONTH A/C XXXXXX (seem to be bi-monthly)

 

I contacted the NW phone helpline but they told me to approach my manager for information on what the latter actually is. Still waiting for her call back. As most of my charges were racked up 4 or more years ago I need to get this in quickly as I understand I can only go back 6 years and each day I lose some more charges to chase!

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) overdraft arrangement fee is business charge for overdraft.(should be yearly)

2) charges for having the account. I will rephrase that, useage charges, ie paying in taking out, etc,etc

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately not, unpaid items fees, YES, Referral Fees YES and maintenance charge YES(not sure you get many of them on a business account).

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a forum for business accounts. I would start a thread there and then those who have business claims can advise as they are slightly different to personal accounts. I will edit this with a link

There you go.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/business-claims-bank-charges/

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well the basics of charges is statements and knowing what the charge is for so we have 4 basic charges all claimable. The fifth one there is on the basis that the other four have caused the problem to arise and therefore they are penalising you more.

 

1) Unarranged Borrowing Fee or Maintenance Charge-- This is when you have an overdraft or not and you go over that. The bank charges through charging periods which last a month and the charge goes out at the end of the month.

2) Unpaid Item/Return Cheque Fee- this appears on the statement and is when there is not sufficient funds in the account the previous working day(mon to Friday) to cover either a cheque, a direct debit or standing order to cover the amount going out. The bank "bounces" or does not pay the item and you get charged for it.

3) Card Misuse or Guaranteed Card Payment Fee(gtee card pymt)--This is when an item is paid by switch and goes through the account when the account is over its agreed or unagreed overdraft.

4) Referral Fee-- This is when an item is, rather than bounced is paid which takes the account over an agreed or unagreed overdraft by more than £26. 3 charges maximum a month on that last one.

5) Card Recovery Fee- This is when someone comes round to your house to recover your bank card

 

 

We have the main charges so what is the amounts i am looking for?

 

1) Unarranged Borrowing/Maintenance Charge

in 2000 it was £14 which then increased to £20 from April 2003 and then £28 from September 2004.

2) Unpaid Items/Return Cheque Fee

In 2000 it was £30 which went up to £38 from March 2005 (for businesses this is currently £35) Edit: From November 2007 max charge per day is £114 or three items.

3) Card Misuse or guaranteed Card Payment Fee-

In 2000 this was £25 and then went up in March 2005 to £35

4) Referral Fees

It was £25 per item(maximum of £75 per month). This changed in September 2004 to £30 per item(maximum of £90 per month).

5) Card Recovery Fee ---£125(not aware if any change to this charge has occurred)

 

 

This is a slightly better, presentation wise of the NatWest charges guide. When i wrote the original it was good but this post is better now ;)

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...