Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Information Held By Credit Reference Agencies - Next Directory


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not sure if I am posting in the right forum here but heregoes. I have recently checked my credit file and noticed some wrong information. Basically I had an account with Next and was defaulted in May 2005, managed to pay a full and final settlement 6 weeks later to DCA and thought no more about it. Anyway after seeing credit file Next have not updated the file since may 2005 and states there is the original balance outstanding, no mention of any payment by me whatsoever. This has been on here for almost a year now giving out wrong information and never being updated. Am going to try and get default removed. Any ideas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

I wrote to the relevant CRA's, and explained the situation, they in turn got in touch with the supposed creditor, took a couple of weeks, badda bing, baddaboom, information updated and correction made. The entry actually disappeared.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Battleaxe, have spoken to CRA and they have confirmed this also but as posted above they had issued a default against me so want to try and clear this as well, so am thinking of right action to take. Will start with letter asking for CCA, by the looks of things though no-one has received one from Next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent Next a S10 DPA 1998 letter stating that they do not have my consent to give my details out to third parties may be worth your time sending one to them recorded delivery. That way if they do discuss your information with third parties after that then they will have some explaining to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, is the S10 DPA letter in templates, if not where can I access it, not that familiar with all this, only bank charge claims :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

- just subscribing!! good luck

If I have been of any help to you please be kind enough to click on my scales! Thank you

 

:D Halifax Bank...December 2006 ..... WON! 1 week after N1 filed.

:eek: Lloyds TSB....... April 2007 Lloyds TSB.....WON, 1 day before prelim. court date, still went before judge.

:p Nationwide.........April 2007 Nationwide.......WON, 3 weeks after N1 filed.

:rolleyes: Nat West....June 2007 (on behalf of friend) Settled after LBA and before filing.

:smile:HSBC - full settlement ...on behalf of my son...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am considering sending letter to Next from Surlybonds default removal template and just taking out the bits that do not apply. Have been doing alot of reading since I started this thread and it occurs to me as they have not updated my credit file since I made my full and final payment (no record of my payment on credit file) almost a year ago that perhaps now that this contract is terminated hopefully the permission to disclose has died with it, in which case I am hoping that the legal right to hold default on file is no longer there (being historic data).

 

Any comments welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, have been busy this evening. Will be sending tomorrow to Next - CCA letter, Surlybonds default letter (amended to suit) and Statutory notice S.10 & 12. Am also sending letters to all 3 CRA's. Will post updates when I get replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All above sent - have also read that according to the Fourth Data Protection Principle it requires 'personal data is accurate and where necessary kept up to date' which it has not. It has been 11 months since default and that is the last time they put an entry on my file, they have never updated it to show payment 7 weeks after default (full and final settlement) - can they have it both ways, comments welcome please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Doo,

 

Now subscribing to your thread....

 

Yes all accounts you hold should keep your credit information accurate and up to date just as you should when you apply for such credit.

 

If the account is settled your credit file should show this. If it does not then Next have seriously gone against all rules, regs and your rights!

 

I take it the letter you've written to all three CRA's explains this? They do all often say that if information is inaccurate on your file they attempt to address the creditor themselves.

 

Hope this helps?

 

Smel :cool:

HSBC *WON* Total £3500

Capital One *WON* Total £385 plus removal of default

Next Disputing Default Notice - CRA's were very unhelpful, am going to make a complaint to OFT/FSA and considering court action following this.

For the Husband:

NatWest Current Account *WON* Total £3500 plus removal of default

Yes Car Credit PPI Posting SAR and first letter this week...

Next up...

HFC Loan - PPI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smel, thanks for subscribing.

 

Agree with you on your thread, will advise CRAs that Next have no signed CCAs - lets see where that gets us. Am happy at the moment that Next have not updated my credit file as I am hoping it will work in my favour - we shall see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The action I have taken so far:

 

1 CCA request (they have just wrote back to confirm they do not hold a signed credit agreement - no surprises there then). They also go on to say that a default entry will be made on my credit file - well I think they need to look at my file coz they have already done this.

 

2 Sent 'surlys' template letter in the stickys, changed to suit - 5 page letter so lots in there, in short am awaiting copy of my T&Cs and default notice. Rang Next today and this letter is in the hands of the legal department who say I should have a reply within 28 days.

 

3 Sent Statutory Notice s.10 & s.12. Well they have completely ignored this, whereas my credit file has never been updated since May 06 and has shown no payment made to this account (paid full and final beginning of July 06) they have now decided 11 months later to go and update my credit file.

 

Will update when I get more information back from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have not had time yet to properly digest the 3 page reply next have sent me (due to other claims) however, in short they have completely ignored my stat notice s.10 & s12, they have decided after 11 months of leaving the wrong information on my file that they would now issue the information that the account is paid. Also they have sent me a copy of my default notice (never received) it has COPY stamped on the top, is dated April 2006 and is addressed to me, part of my address, no county and a SE something postcode, have not got a clue where this is but certainly not near me (does anyone know). Will now write to OFT as srmjmm10 has posted some positives on doing this, all this info will now be sent onto the Information Commissioners Office. If anyone has any comments please let me know. Will also write with all this info to the 3 CRAs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Responded to the letter Next sent me a couple of weeks ago but as yet is still showing it has not been signed for by Royal Mail track and trace, will re-send just to make sure they do get it as I want a reply. Also have CRA tackling it from their end, Experian have contacted Next and have put a notice of correction on my file, not sure how much success this will have though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, must admit I have a funny feeling that they have got it but like you say have not signed for it. May give them a ring if I haven't had a reply by the end of the week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK, have now spoken to Next and it seems they could not locate my letter so have now e-mailed it to them. Also they have sent me a 'reproduced' copy of my default notice and as already mentioned it has the wrong postcode, now they have confirmed to me they do not keep original notices but they send out reproduced copies to show you what you would have received - so no true copy - I was also told that the postcode error was a typo - the fight continues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...