Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest breach DPA and try to win me over win 'chilean value brand of the year' wine?


Jimmyboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6246 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

woah im in shock!

 

When i ordered my statements from Natwest, they just handed them to me (6yrs worth) with no ID or security, so i told them about it in my complaint and how illegal it is.

 

Next minute, a delivery guy brings me a nice looking package, i open it to find that theres a natwest box saying 'sincere apologies for behalf of the team' from the manager of the branch in question.

 

Oh thats nice, i think...Only when i look on the internet (like you do, to see how expensive it is) i see its 'chilean value brand of the year.

 

Now what do i do?!?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

DRINK THE WINE ;) AND START YOUR CLAIM.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DRINK THE WINE ;) AND START YOUR CLAIM.

 

Luvvin' that post Parkie!!!!!!!! xxx :D

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try the website simply thankyou, which is who natwest use. It is not buying you off it is a gesture for a breach by staff of DPA, what would like? a public hanging of the member of staff? I am sure that it could be arranged. Television cameras there maybe? I am sure the Daily Mail could arrange a photographer. The member of staff could be sacked i suppose, for not actually following bank procedure, which they clearly weren;t. And i am sure a fraudster just knew you were waiting for 6 years worth of charges on statements. Hey maybe he might even have claimed the money himself!!

 

Sorry for the sarcasm but come on, what would you want for a staff mistake? Sacking?

 

Ooooooooooooh nattie........... keep your knickers on honey!!!! And jimmyboy - if you don't want the wine.........send it mine and Fendy's ways!!!!!!!! Woohoo!!!!! xxx ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loving that memo! But I am now wondering if I should have made a comlaint about my statements. I requested them in my DPA SAR, they arrived on the 39 day, and they were in a plain white envelope that was all torn open, sent 1st class and didnt even require a signature. I did complain verbally to Stuart Higley who just appologised. I have worked in a bank for 17 yrs, and am examined on the DPA anually. I was so engrossed in getting these turkeys to pay my edited money back, that I never put my complaint in writing, even though at the time I was sure that they had to send this sort of sensitive material in a secure way, and in a manner which would require a signature from the recipient. It could have gotten into anyones hands, which would have been wonderful for the potential fraudsters out there. A bit silly me thinks! Oh well!

 

skintmum inc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loving that memo! But I am now wondering if I should have made a comlaint about my statements. I requested them in my DPA SAR, they arrived on the 39 day, and they were in a plain white envelope that was all torn open, sent 1st class and didnt even require a signature. I did complain verbally to Stuart Higley who just appologised. I have worked in a bank for 17 yrs, and am examined on the DPA anually. I was so engrossed in getting these turkeys to pay my money back, that I never put my complaint in writing, even though at the time I was sure that they had to send this sort of sensitive material in a secure way, and in a manner which would require a signature from the recipient. It could have gotten into anyones hands, which would have been wonderful for the potential fraudsters out there. A bit silly me thinks! Oh well!

 

skintmum inc.

 

Don't worry - at least you've got your statements now and can start your claim. And let's face it, you could've come unstuck yourself if you complained as you actually work in a bank (small world this banking world after all!!!). Good luck getting your cash back, hedgey xxx ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

Hedgey, you need to be careful if you quote people especially if potentially libellous words are used on a thread. not the OP by the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now edited

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just felt wound up that they would send me cheap wine through the post. Another thing that shows how sincere their apology is is the fact that they cannot even spell "Piccadilly" correctly?! Makes me chuckle.

 

I recieved a letter today saying that these incidents are extremely rare...ooops...wait, this is the branch that was on watchdog for binning sacks full of confidential waste in December!

 

I wonder if they wil send the refund cheque as fast as the wine??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correction to my last posting. Don't drink it cook with it. ;) Nattie don't send a possee out for me. 9.5billion

profit. You lucky they never sent you a case of it.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

if you all are interested in looking at how much the bank paid for the wine, rather than the cheap shots on profits, see the website for simply thankyou posted further on the thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nattie i have the uppermost respect for you and the work you do on this site is second to none. The fact that you work for Nat West and disagree with their rate of charging that they have unlawfully inflicted on their customers. Deserves the upper

most credit that can be bestowed on you. It is very comforting to no that someone at Nat West does care, and no doubt there are many who work for Nat West who have the same sympathies as you." Cheap shots on profits. " A great proportion of those profits have caused bankrupcy, hardship and misery to many men, women and children. Not just on this site,but all over the UK. Reap what you sow. Made round to come round. All your chickens come home to roost. These all apply very easily to Nat

West. I really don't care about some bottle of wine, but like you Nattie i care about all these people fighting for their rights against the insatiable greed of this bank.

Nattie had to get that of my chest. Sorry

Jimmyboy sorry for hijacking your thread.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parkvale,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, my hero....... wow. What a completely accurate, heartfelt and brilliant little para. I agree with every last letter you posted there. Karma mate......... what goes around, comes around. We are not having pops at Natwest staff, but at the organisation itself. Im sure 95% of the staff are good decent hard working honest people, but is the 5% bunch of t*ssers that spoilt it for the rest, and the fact that whomever you end up speaking to there with any kind of problem, or crisis or anything, the all pass the book. You can never ever ever come across somebody, a person, a human being with a real name etc. etc. with whom the book finally stops with, for your personal account. At the end of the day there has to be one person who is accountable for helping with your problems, but there never is. Its faceless........... and ultimately that faceless organisation shows you the door the second you get into any kind of pickle. They are a business run for profit, I totally understand that, but whatever happened to a little compassion for customers who have normally run their affairs in very good order, but for whom hard times have hit............ they dont want to know. Thats the bottom line. But what they also forget is that many of those customers experiencing hardship ultimately can and do get themselves out of the pickle, no thanks to Natwest, or whichever bank they are with, and when they do, and theyre back on track again, how can we customers who have been shown the door to give them back our now very good business and account. Why should they be surprised when we close our accounts, because believe my, my manager on premium rate two years ago, almost begged me not to move accounts. It was embarrasing............. Story of life. They only want you when youre winning, and if you are a nobody, like most of us are, (to them anyway), then they are just not interested ever in helping out and extending the hand of help, even when the can see we have a perfectly plausible way of getting out of our situ given time and a good business plan. Nattie, I re-iterate everything above, you are a star, but stop taking the Nasty West thing so personally. You are merely a cog within a wheel my friend, nothing more. But a star on here. Chill Nattie, chill. Fendy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

And as usual very good advice Nattie. Fendy xx;)

Cheer up. Plenty of claims going in. The tide must be at a huge swell by now. Any news from an insider point of view i.e. from the head bods there about claims increasing, have they noticed the tide getting bigger and bigger. Wonder if makes them wonder about perhaps changing tactics at all. Maybe even turn up to court to defend and actually give account of their breakdown. Hum, just a thought. Hope they dont decide to do it with me. Heck, legs might turn to jelly mush. fendy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jellymush ??

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was only joking, but good to hear the true fendy transalation of it ;)

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...