Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Embracing your unique selfView the full article
    • Hearing held today in court. I attended in person and Evri had an advocate attend on their behalf to defend their position that my contract is with Packlink and not with them. I also provided a copy of Evri's terms and conditions which explains that a contract is entered into when a parcel is sent with Evri. The judge pointed this out to the Advocate and agreed there is a contract between me and Evri under the Ts and Cs. The judge explained that while Packlink are responsible for organising the delivery of the item, it is Evri who are responsible for handling the goods and delivering them, and therefor Evri has a responsibility to handle the goods with reasonable care and skill. So am pleased to say the judge found in my favour. Hearing lasted about 75mins. Evri has been ordered to make payment within 21 days. Also nice to meet @jk2054 in person.
    • Good morning,    I just wanted to update you on the situation.    I have visits piling up with my current employment and they need doing before I finish at the end of this month.  I am moving to Wiltshire in 3 weeks for a new job helping care homes with their Dementia patients. I tried to work it out and at a guess I will be doing about 20-25,000 miles a year. So need a vehicle that can cope with that mileage, my old car would have done it easy but 🤷‍♂️ I have taken out a loan and got a friend to find me a reliable car that can cope with the miles and hasn't been written off in the past.   I phoned Adrian flux to see if I could use the last months insurance on a new car I have bought, the girl I spoke to phoned Markerstudy and asked them but they said no, my new car doesn't have any modifications.    I had an email from someone who saw one of my appeals for information, they live near the site of the accident and know a nearby farmer who has a security camera at his entrance that catches the traffic and specifically registration plates as he has been robbed before. They said they would reach out for me and see if he still has the data. Unfortunately it wont catch the scene of the crash.   The Police phoned me and said they were closing the report I made, even if they found footage of the vehicle at the time I said the actual incident would be my word vs theirs.  My first response was I am sure google maps would show that they turned around at that location which would verify my version of events, but upon reflection I do understand, I have seen people doing make up with both hands while driving, eating from a bowl steering with their knees and veering all over the place. I am sure some of these people go off the road and claim that someone forced them off.    Markerstudy phoned me yesterday to say that my car is now at Copart, the £80 tank of Vpower diesel was emptied on entry to the site for safety reasons, which I get but it sucks.  It is awaiting being assessed and shouldn't be too long, which is a relief.  I am really glad things do not seem to be going the way of the other stories and they seem to moving quickly.   However I was informed that my car was a structural write off before I bought it - this destroyed me, I was almost sick.  and this is going to affect any offer of money - after hearing the first statement this didn't affect me.   They need to wait for the assessor to check it over but it is highly likely to be written off and the maximum they can offer is £2300.  I was desperate for a car as I was working for an agency at the time, no work no pay, and did not do a vehicle check because I didn't know about them.  The seller did not tell me that it had been structurally written off, he told me that it had the front wing damaged while parked and was repaired at an approved repairer.  Markerstudy records state that it was sold at auction, no record of repair at an approved repairer.  I bought it bank transfer with hand written receipt.    It gets worse.    It turns out my airbags should of gone off. For some reason they are not working. I think we can figure out why.  If I had hit that car head on and had no airbags.    Some good news.    I can arrange a time with Copart to go and take my stereo equipment and any personal items that are left in the car only. I cant live without music and need quality sound, my speakers and amps are Hertz and JLaudio, (no I am not a boy racer with booming subs, I am an audiophile on a budget) I was really worried I wouldn't get them back so this is a huge relief for me. It is stuff I have built up over years of saving and collecting. Everything to do with the vehicle and mods I have declared need to stay to be assessed.   The accident has gone as a fault on my record, I have to remove 2 years NCB which means I still have some to declare which is good.  So it appears at this point that it may be resolved quickly, not in the way I was hoping, but not as bad as I presumed it was going to be based upon that tow truck drivers attitude and behaviour and the horror stories I read.   I am not going to buy the car back and try to make money with all the parts on it, I don't have the time or energy.   I may need an xray on my back and neck.  The whole situation has left me feeling physically sick, drained and I need it done.   The lesson learnt from this  -  My conscience is 100% clear, my attitude to safety and strong sense of personal responsibility - A rated tyres even if on credit card, brake fluid flush every year, regular checks of pads and discs, bushes etc, made avoiding what I believed to be a certain broadside collision possible.   Get a dashcam (searching now for the best I can afford at the moment)  -  Research your insurance company before you buy  -  Pay for total car check before you go and see a car and take someone with you if you are not confident in your ability to assess a vehicle.      Thank you to everyone here who volunteers their time, energy and information, it is greatly appreciated.  You helped my sister with some advice a while ago but we weren't able to follow through, she is struggling with long term health conditions and I ended up in hospital for a while with myocarditis, when I got out and remembered it was too late.  I am going to make a donation now, it is not a lot, I wish I could give more, I will try to come back when things are on a more even keel.    Take care
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

accepting 65% offer?


saka
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Being new to the forum, I'd appreciate your advice.

A friend recently informed me about my right to reclaim unfair bank charges. I have now sent off a letter to my bank requesting a refund of all charges applied within the past 6 years.

I'd be interested in your experience with regard to claiming the full amount back and not only the difference based on the 12,- per item, as I consider this as still too high a charge.

My friend advised me to just accept the amount they will offer on a goodwill basis and not to be too "greedy", but I consider this not as being greedy but as my right as a customer to claim my money back. If somebody is greedy, it's the banks!

Have you got any experiences, perhaps with Barclays in particular? Has it happened to you that they refunded the full amount? What arguments did you bring forward when they tried to offer you a much lower amount?

My charges are 1745,- altogether.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Full amount, please read the self help material and when you're ready start a thread in your banks forum to keep us informed.

 

Nothing greedy about wanting money that has been taken from you unlawfully.

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

Barclays offered me 1200,- in response to my 1750,- claim, which I am tempted to accept, since it is more than the usual 50% offer.

 

It means Barclays considers 7,43 to be a "fair" charge for each of the 74 charged items during the past 6 years (550,- difference :74 items). On the other hand the 550,- they would keep is still a lot of money for me - and for them it's just peanuts...

 

Do you think it is worth going to court for this amount? What if the court agrees with Barclays and considers 7,43 to be a fair "charge" and I would in the end get nothing at all....?

 

If I would decide to go for the full amount, would the next step have to be the formal "letter of rejection of offer"? Or could I first try it with an informal letter "in my own words" and ask for a better offer as a compromise. I'd be happy with 1500,- as an out-of-court settlement.

 

I am not an English native speaker and am a bit afraid of going to court and not be able to defend myself good enough with my not perfect English (compared to the Barclays solicitor...???).

 

Thanks for your advice!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly, I am assuming your amount is £1700 BEFORE interest???

if so youd prob be looking at around £2000

 

If you decide to carry on, you need to accept their offer as part settlement with the intention to continue to recover the full amount

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays have a culture of dishonesty. That was explained on the recent BBC programme.

They have taken your money. You should take it all back.

If you don't want it all then you can donate the excess to us as we ned the money.

 

I have no idea why you should want to let them keep part of your money.

Are you French?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, BankFodder.

 

I'm German (not a very popular nation in this country (still), I'm afraid...) - but this is irrelevant really - I must however say my German bank would not dare demanding such high charges. Germans tend to complain immediately, which is sometimes annoying, but in cases like this it's a preventative advantage (I've already become more English, I suppose) ;)

 

I will certainly donate something to you, that's for sure anyway.

 

Would you be able to give advice with another problem I have just encountered, oh dear:

 

Having now listed all charges by date on the interest calculation template sheet, I noticed that I actually claimed too much, because I didn't notice that Barclays sent me some print-outs of my statements twice. The amount is now 1585,- and not 1750,-. But - plus interest of 458,63 I could now claim 2043,63 which is what dar3n assumed :rolleyes:

 

Is it advisable not to mention this mistake in my next letter (it could make them think I have no idea of what I'm doing and be a sign of weakness)? I could just mention: "After calculation of the interest the amount comes to 2043,63 and I therefore do not accept the offer of 1200,-..." (and would amend the template letter "refusal of the offer" accordingly).

 

Would you agree with this?

 

Thanks for your help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Saka,

I too was offered an offer( just like everyone else!) of about 60%, and I ummed and aahed for about 30 minutes before I decided that the Bank have been wrong to overcharge me, and need to be taught a lesson as on behalf of the public. They cannot get away with this easy theft from our pockets, so I hope you take them all the way and get the interest that they have also stolen from you. There are some excellant spreadsheets here to help you calculate the interest, and my preference is for (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/6964-spreadsheet-interest.html?highlight=vampiress)Good luck, and just know that there is plenty of support here,

 

Red

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just mention the new figure in your next letter and issue your summons for that.

 

Their culture of dishonesty is no doubt so profound that they will be incapable of recognising your corrected figure as a gesture of honesty so don't waste your time giving any explanations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Bankfodder, simply accept their offer as part payment but continue to reclaim all that is owed, this is all very standard practice,

you request your money, they offer silly amount, you accept but continue to court, thay say they are sorry you cant reach an agreement and then they shut up until about a week before the court date.

 

if you get stuck try here:

if you are still stuck just shout up we will soon come to your rescue...

 

good luck.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have all been very helpful, thank you!! :p

 

Could I also ask you to have a quick look at my next letter to Barclays?

 

Would you recommend to enclose the interest calculation sheet (I had not included the interest in my first claim)? This would mean, however, that from the calculation sheet they will notice the difference in the corrected new amount and the original claimed amount (I had claimed 200,- too much because of Barclays' confusing bank statement printouts).

 

I tend to just mention the new amount including interest without enclosing a detailed list. By doing this I am not being dishonest, as it shows the amended total of charges plus interest. But should they ask for the calculation sheet, I can still send it to them.

 

Here is my draft letter:

 

 

 

Re: Penalty and unfair charges - account number xxxxxx, sort code xxxxxx

 

 

Template letter removed.

 

The draft you did was fine send that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as your letter has been removed i am assuming you had personal information displayed,

be careful what you post on here, i.e account numbers etc.

 

send in your 'letter of rejection' but make sure you refer to the new amount, i.e thanks for the offer, I accept as part..... i will continue to recover £xxxx.00 plus interest and court costs.

but you wont be including the interest until you register with MCOL or complete your N149 form.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, dar3en.

 

Sent letter off yesterday....also noticed that they upgraded me to an Additions Account (from my Basic Current Account) and charged me more for that - without asking me!!! Also mentioned this in my letter of rejection of offer....

 

By the way: The Federal Court of Justice in Germany ruled that it is illegal for German banks to charge customers with a flat-rate "compensation" for bounced cheques or failed direct debits. The Dresdner Bank had charged its customers 6 Euros (4 GBP) per item. Bank customers in Germany can now also claim back their past bank charges. German courts argue that a "compensation" could only be claimed by the banks if the debtor (bank customer) commited any breaches. It argues that this is not the case with failed direct debits or cheques due to the fact that the bank customer is not obliged towards its paying bank to hold sufficient funds for the payment of the direct debit. The paying bank is not acting on behalf of the debtor (bank customer) but accesses its customers' bank accounts on request of the creditor bank - so, without the direct order of the bank customer. This system of direct debit payments implies that it is to be of no interest whatsoever to the paying bank, whether the debtor (bank customer) has given order for a direct debit at all and also of no interest whether the debtor (bank customer) owes the creditor anything.

 

Hope this sounds not too complicated....to summarize:

 

It is unlawful under German law if German banks charge their customers for informing them about a bounced direct debit or cheque payment due to insufficient funds. It is a duty of the banks to do this and naturally expected as an additional service by the banks towards its customers. Also, DPA information (bank statements, list of charges) must be free of charge if this is required for a reclamation purposes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My story so far:

 

- 26 January: sent DPA letter

- 18 February: received statements of past 6 years

- 20 February: sent letter of request of refund

- 28 February: received letter "we are looking into your concerns and will let you have an answer no later than 21 March

- 22 March: have not received an answer - sent a reminder

- 23 March: received answer - 65% offer as "gesture of goodwill" (tempting, as they promise to pay it within 7 days of my response - but not good enough!)

- 25 March: sent letter of rejection of offer accepting the offer as part settlement only and demanding full amount - within next 7 days

 

Am going to wait until 5 April - will send LBA letter if I haven't received a reply by then:

 

"I refer to my letter of..... to which you have failed to respond in the way I would have hoped.

Once again, I request repayment of the full amount of charges taken from my account during the past 6 years. I calculate that you have taken ..... plus 8% interest in the amount of ......totalling....

If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest without further notice. An extra £0.77 will also be applied to the total each day until the date of judgement/settlement, plus the cost of any court fees incurred.

Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act.

Yours faithfully"

 

Is this letter appropriate, do I need to mention anything else?

 

Thank you everybody for your help so far. Will keep you informed :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Saka

 

I am new to this also, I think you need to reign in your timescales(I mean stick to the time given in your letters). They need to take your demands seriously. The longest time allowed as far as I am aware is 40 days and that is with your first letter subsequent letters are 14 days grace, no begging reminder letters pls, this is not in your interest just be praying it gets to court stage when you can claim the interest on top.

 

If we go by your refund request letter of the 20th Feb the alotted time has expired in my opinion that means you can file in court, I think. Maybe I have got it all wrong. Can a MOD help out here plzzzzzzzzzz.

 

Good luck with it

Deeks1

Link to post
Share on other sites

saka,

Personally, I would take your letter of rejection as being your LBA.

Barclays are NOT going to communicate with you now that you have declined their 'offer of goodwill'

On 5th April begin proceedings with MCOL.

They will know youre serious then.

it is only when you get a court date that they begin to take you seriously.

 

Ive been where you are, sending polite reminders, emails etc, they dont respond, theyre too busy too now.

 

you need to get to court stage as soon as possible now.

Something that may be in your favour is the fact that the stage of ALLOCATION QUESTIONAIRE is being written off by most judges cos they are now aware that Barclays have no intention of attending court.

 

Keep us posted okay?

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dar3n and Deeks for your advice. I will do as you recommend and won't send another LBA but begin with the proceedings straight away end of this week. You are absolutely right. If they don't reply positively, then why bother with another letter. They won't give in anyway. Just a waste of time.

I was just not sure whether, before going to court, I would have to send a formal LBA giving them another 14 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have patiently waited for 3 weeks (gave another few days because of Easter, pffff I'm just too generous) for a reply from Barclays. They've had sufficient time now to send a reply to my rejection of offer letter, but I have received no answer, they just seem to ignore it. My initial letter was sent off 20 Feb. I think I have wasted enough time, so have just submitted my MCOL.

 

Do I understand it right that all I now have to do at this point is send a letter with a schedule of charges and interest to MCOL to be attached to my online claim? And then wait for a letter from the court?

 

Do I also need to send a letter to Barclays and inform them of my MCOL or do they get a letter from MCOL directly? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saka, you will prob better off focussing comms on Litigation at Churchill PLace, London from now on.

 

Now you have filed with MCOL they will take it from here, and let you know that the order has been served and if and when B's decide to defend, dont be too hasty and get over excited at the 28 day deadline as B's are entering defence late these days.

 

Yes send a copy of SOC's one for court and one for B's

I sent mine directly to B's, some people send it to the court to send on.

 

Remember all comms via Recorded Delivery.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...