Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
    • Thanks for coming back to us. There are no guarantees - but remember that so far MET have not had the guts to put even a single case before a judge.  Not once. Yours is one of seven court cases. Three ongoing like yours. In two MET bottled it as Witness Statement stage approached. In one the allocating judge decided their Particulars of Claim were rubbish and threw the case in the bin. Just the one victory by MET by default when the motorist stupidly didn't file a defence. So there is every chance that MET will throw in the towel in your case too if you stand firm. Please keep us informed of what is happening. Regarding being abroad, that is no reason for things going wrong, you can request an on-line hearing and we've had several cases where the PPC gave up when the motorist moved abroad. But please keep us in the loop.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lou vs HSBC


cephas
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6072 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My 28 days are up now and i have had my notice of tranfer to the nottingham court. Northhampton didnt issue an AQ but notts may do. From what i can gather im one of the first dealing with this new tactic from the court so i will be keeping peeps up to date. so now im just waiting for a letter from my local judge or even better an offer from DG. anyway will keep you posted. Good luck with your claim.

pelim letter sent 25/01/2007

reply from hsbc 01/02/2007

LBA letter sent 16/02/07

MCOL Issued 06/03/07

Deemed served 11/03/07

Deadline 08/04/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My 30 days are now up and i have not heard anything from MCOL, i have read a few threads on notice of transfer to the local court and not issuing AQ. So I presume I should wait to hear from my local court?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok - bit of advise pls. My claim is as follows: £1,427 charges; £151.79 interest and £150 fee for filing claim on MCOL. = £1,728

 

I have had a letter from DG today offering me £1278 and saying one of the charges which was for £7.50 was to stop a cheque which will not be considered. I do not want to accept this offer and i am waiting for a notice of transfer to my local court as my 28 days were up end of last week. Any advise on what is the best way forward, ignore this letter to maybe write to them, has anyone got any standard letters i could use?

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found the template letter for declining an offer. In the letter HSBC wrote they mentioned that I could not claim for a stopped cheque, i did not realise i put this in my schedule of charges, but i remember calling them to stop a cheque a few years ago. Should i mention in the below letter that I am willing to deduct £7.50 from my claim for stopping a cheque?

 

Dear [ ],

 

Thank you for your letter dated 01/05/2007. I respectfully decline your offer of Full and Final settlement.

 

You may not have been aware that I commenced legal action against you for the full amount plus interest and costs on XX/XX/XX and I would ask that you now refer this matter to your legal department for further instruction.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Lou, Yes this is a fee and they are allowed to charge for stopped cheques. I would revise your claim schedule and send it with the letter stating you will accept whatever new figure the schedule is giving you.

Have they detailed anything else they have removed from your claim and why?

From the figures you noted in your post above you have the MCOL fee at £150, this should be £120. Make sure your figures are correct and send in your revised schedule.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply - i will amend the schedule accordingly (minus the £7.50) and send it together with the letter. The only other thing that was mentioned in the letter was that i couldn't claim interest as they do not accept this as appropriate. Yes sorry that was a typo - its was £120 fee to MCOL. I received the letter from HSBC direct and not DG.

 

I also put a claim in for my joint account only for £160 and they sent a letter for this account offering £150, which i will accept as this hasn't gone to the MCOL stage yet, at least the smaller one is sorted now.

 

Thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think its a good idea to call DG to see if they received my letter which i sent last week regarding declining an offer from the bank directly? The only number i have is 0121 455 2701.

 

My 28 days were up on 30th April and i have not heard anything from MCOL regrding transfer to my local court, should i call MCOL?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wont do any harm to ring them.

 

Rachel Tomlinson 0121 455 2701 [email protected]

Debbie Daubney 0121 455 2111 [email protected]

Kate Eaves 0121 455 2196 [email protected]

Alan Burden 0121 455 2206 [email protected]

 

Fax; 0121 455 2660

Unknown; 0121 455 2150

 

These are the folks that seem to deal with claims after initial court claims start. From Nettyg v HSBC thread.

 

Have a look on MCOL and see what the status of your claim is now, if they have not defended, try pressing the judgment by default button.:)

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should say something like "we can no longer continue with your case at mcol and we are transfering your case to your local court" You should then receive a transfer notification in the post. As they seem to be dispensing with AQ's now you should then follow the steps in this thread

New---after 28 Days - Maybe No Aq!!!!!!!

Give MCOL a ring to ask whats happening just to make sure.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lou hows it all going? I still havent heard anything yet. Its been nearly 4 weeks now since they transfered it to my local court. Havent heard a sausage from DG. Well one still waits.

pelim letter sent 25/01/2007

reply from hsbc 01/02/2007

LBA letter sent 16/02/07

MCOL Issued 06/03/07

Deemed served 11/03/07

Deadline 08/04/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally I received my notice of transfer yesterday! Should i just wait to hear from the local court or do i need to phone them regarding the AQ?

 

I have sent my first nudge letter to DG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I received my notice or transfer to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch court about 3 weeks ago; i called on 24th May to see what is happening as i haven’t received a court date. Apparently my claim was with the judge. I still haven’t received anything. :confused:

Are there any others out there that have been transferred to the Clerkenwell & Shoreditch court?

Is it worth another call to see what is happening?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received AQ to be filled in today with £100 fee, i have sent two nudge letters to DG saying that the AQ may not be required.

 

Is it worth sending them a third letter to say i have received AQ with £100 fee and this amount will be added to my claim and also asking for settlement before a court date is issued?

 

It just seems to be so long winded, and im worried that if i pay the £100 fee the judge my throw it out of court and i would have lost my money.

Any advice?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok - after a month of waiting to hear from my local court, i have recived a letter with an AQ attached for me to fill in. It need to be completed by 22 June and £100 fee is payable.

 

There is no mention on the letter about DG filing an AQ, or for me to send them a copy of my AQ. Is this normal?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure on this as I had aq dispensed with but from my understanding you should send dg a copy together with a note asking when they intend to file theirs and could they please send you a courtesy copy. This will show them you are serious about going to court.

You will add the filing fee to your claim, so you will get the 100 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Within the AQ, Under case management, it asks for amount in dispute. On the AQ thread it mentions entering amount plus all interest but not costs, do i get my costs back? Also i used the spreadsheet on this site to calcualte my interest, so would i use this figure and do i add any daily rate :confused: to the amount?

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Freaky, just one more question if you know the answer..... under other info, it ask if i am attaching any other docs to the AQ, I am attaching the proposed draft directons, would this be a document(probably a silly question i know but i want to make sure i fill this in properly)?

 

Also it ask if i intend to make any other applications, what does this mean do you know?

 

Thanks again for your help, much appriciated!

Louise

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...