Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Estela V Barclays


estela
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

if everything goes to plan, the judge will either send out the AQ or notify you that it is not needed in this case, then its court time, so dont neglect your court bundles, the time soon catches up with you.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all

Friday 27 went to MCOL there was nothing, the 14th day was on Saturday 28, went back on Sunday and there was a Defence filed, it says Defence 26.03.07 that was the day i put my claim, what will happen now, just wait for the questionnaire, court day???:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Hi Estela,

 

Yes their standard delay tactic to defend. Costs them nothing to defend and of course they can't be seen as been guilty by default!, or be seen giving you your money too early or without a fight.

 

So the matter now will be transferred to your local court.

 

The court will be in touch and forward you a copy of their defence. Thumb twiddling time till then as nothing can be done except to read up on bundles and maybe prepare for what is called an allocation questionare to arrive.

 

This is a set of either questions they are asking you on what you are seeking and to allocate time as an estimate.

 

To read up about them and how to fill it out should it arrive click here

Allocation Questionnaires - A guide to completion

 

Some courts know of the banks and issues and have dispensed with them, so if they have, don't panic, here is another link!

 

Is your court dispensing with the Allocation Questionnaire?

 

After this you will receive a court date!

 

The bundles information the link has already been given. Hope this gives some more direction of what next.....all the best with your claim..

 

Bundles you have already been given information on...all the best!

 

CJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chloejane

 

Thank you for your advice I will start to read and read, do you know why on the MCOL claim to Barclays says served 26/03/07 as that was the day i put the claim on line, I have 2 other claims to Halifax and theyve aknowledge the claim so from which date you start counting the 28 days they have to file a defence as it say from date served does this mean from the day i put my claim on line???

Thank you again;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received today Notice of Transfer of Proceedings

Without hearing

It ios ordered that

The filing of an allocation questionnaire be dispensed with in this case unless the Disctrict Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise

Note: Any party affeced by this Order may under Rule 3.3(5) apply it set aside, varied or stayed. Such a party must apply under Rule 23.3. within 14 days of service of this order. Please note that an allocation fee may be payable in this instance. Please contact the court of transfer for further details.

Date order drawn 04.May 2007

Attached the Defence and a Mediation leaflet.

 

The Defence point. 1 reads as follows

The Particulars of Claim do not provide details or particulars of the precise charges alleged to have been unlawful, or the date thereof. To the extent it is alleged that the claimant incurred bank charges on the claimant's account for unauthorised borrowings(wether unpaid fees for returned cheques, "Paid referral fees" or any other such fees), the Defendant puts the Claimant to strict proof of each charge and the date thereof.

 

Then they go on saying that they are entitled to charge bla bla........

point 11 In the alternative, and without prejudice to matters stated above, if (which is denied) the said charges and interest or any part thereof are unlawful or unenforceable as alleged by the claimant or at all, and the charges were a consequence of the breach of contract by the claimant, the defendant has nonetheless suffered loss and damage as a consequence of such breach of contract in allowing the account to go into overdraft. Accordingly, in the event thay the defendant is unable to rely on its express entitlement to enforce the charges as set out above, it will seek to recover to the extent necessary such loss and damage as charges, and the defendant seeks to set off such sums against any liability owed hereunder to the claimant

 

Please some advice on this is point 1 saying that I havent supply a list with charges and interest??? which I have send to Barclays and to the Court!!!!

What about point 11

 

So I have to do something or just wait!!!!

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am at exactly the same point, The defend with 11 points. I was going to try and post them but my typing not that good. I look forward to see if you get any advice.

If I have been of any use to you in my response please click my scales. :oops:

 

MBNA WON 16/3/07 £1700 :p

Barlcays N1 fileld in and awaiting funds to take them to court.

 

If you want to spend some of your money from your new spending saving scheme why not buy a flybook laptop. http://www.everythingflybook.com. I can highly recommend them.

Currently in Litagation with Barclays 11/5/7 ( Awaiting Court Date )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think its saying ... thats its our fault that we went overdrawn and even if the said charges and interest are unlawful and unenforcable (which of course they have denied) they have still suffered loss and damages.

 

Accordingly, in the event thay the defendant is unable to rely on its express entitlement to enforce the charges as set out above, it will seek to recover to the extent necessary such loss and damage as charges, and the defendant seeks to set off such sums against any liability owed hereunder to the claimant

 

Not too sure about this bit ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all

Today received a General Form of judgment or Order

 

"Upon the Courts own motion. The Court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiveing it

IT IS ORDERED THAT

Unless the claimant do file fully particularised particulars of claim by 7 June 2007 the claim be struck out.

 

Dated 17 May 2007"

 

Although the date at the top says 24 May 2007

 

Does this mean that I have to send them copy of my statements???

Please help !!!:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send in your updated SOC's to both parties ASAP.

 

This is in response to the defendants point #1 in their defence

The Particulars of Claim do not provide details or particulars of the precise charges

 

Send them either by recorded or special delivery to Barclays and if poss hand deliver to the court but get a receipt from the receptionist to acknowledge they have received the SOC's

Send them with this letter:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send in your updated SOC's to both parties ASAP.

 

This is in response to the defendants point #1 in their defence

 

Send them either by recorded or special delivery to Barclays and if poss hand deliver to the court but get a receipt from the receptionist to acknowledge they have received the SOC's

Send them with this letter:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html

 

Hi dar£n

Thank you for your advice , I send this in March

27.03.2007

 

 

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT

21-27 St. Katherine's Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

Dear sir/madam

Find enclosed further information to be processed with claim number XXXXXXXX and served on the defendant Barclays Bank.

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Enc (3 copies List of charges)

 

Recorded delivery isnt this what they want again??? or was the letter not clear enough. Thank you:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi estela

 

sorry to hi jack the thread slightly but want to ask Dar£n his thoughts about Barclay defence

 

Daz

 

If you look back to post 36... the defence that estela has quoted is it standard? The reason being that point 11 seems to play into our hands. The mention of breach of contract by going into overdraft...... In my reckoning that contradicts the most recent set of T & C's... If it is a breach then they can not claim the charges are for a service which i believe the T & C's now imply... your thoughts please

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...