Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
    • Thank you dx, that is what I intend to do now. I have gone through all the SAR documents, a lot of which I am seeing for the first time! As per my previous post #116 letters and statements alleged to have been sent to me, as recorded on their system notes I have not received. Letters I have sent requesting information and account statements have not been recorded as being received by them, all were sent either by Recorded or Special Delivery. I have all the proof you menrtioned from my files for payments and from their SAR info for fees added. Thanks t
    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wallop vs Lloyds


wallop1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6100 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have already sent in an initial letter with details of my claim and i have received Lloyds standard reply. About 2 weeks ago i have replied to this and as yet have no reply from them even though that are now out of the 7 working days request for reply i stipulated. Being slightly bullish i collected my N1 court forms this morning and intend to do some work on it over the weekend.

I am claiming over £800 but did not include any calculation for interest. Do i need to write to them again to request this amount also or should i simply include this amount in my N1 form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

If you mean the 8% statutory interest, you don't add that on until you file at Court. Have a look at the following link to help you with your N1:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

 

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Barty:)

  • Haha 1

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all

I now have the money for my court proceeding and have drafted the N1. However, I was wondering whether I ought to send another letter to Lloyds. The reason being is that the other two letters that i sent, i didnt send by registered post. I received a letter back from them from the first letter, but not from the second. Are Lloyds likely to claim that they didnt receive my second letter? If so, is it better for me to send a third letter with confirmation by registered post?

 

I am keen now to get things moving. Does anybody have any experience of dealing with Lloyds when they claim missing letters?

thanks in advance,

wallop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

okay i have just filed my court papers and now looking forward to receiving Lloyds response. My claim total was just under £1200.

 

Please let me know if you want me to transfer this thread to another track or put any of my claim form up.

How exciting!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

ok. have just received the acknowledgement of service from the court and told that Lloyds have decided to defend all of the claim. They have 28 days from the service of the claim form (deemed to be 14 April as per notice of issue). This means that i should expect their defence by 12 May. They have instructed SC&M as usual. Blimey they must be doing well in terms of revenue this year.

 

Do i need to do anything in the interim or just wait for their defence and the allocation questionnaire?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just waiting really, also you may find you are not sent an AQ:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/80091-your-court-dispensing-allocation.html?highlight=dispensed+AQ

 

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just received £750 in my bank account which i guess is a partial success. They havent sent me a letter or anything yet though. I will still look to recoup the rest by not agreeing that this is final settlement. I'm going to continue with litigation until they pay up with the rest.

 

I'll let you know what the letter looks like when it eventually drops through the door.

 

Off to the pub now to celebrate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i received a letter from Lloyds saying that they were offering me the £750 in full and final settlement of my claim, ordinarily they wouldnt do this, but in this instance they would make an exception. I'm going to write a letter back to them saying that i accept this as partial refund but will still claim the outstanding £400+. I will also need to highlight that this will continue to court should i not receive it. Any suggestions of any templates to use anyone?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Barty. I have just sent off the required letter. Is it likely that they will take the amount out of my account then? I'd rather got used to it being in there.

 

In any event, i think we are pretty close to it being settled as they have to enter their defence in 3 days time. The AQ should be sent out next week and then hopefully listing for sometime in the next couple of weeks.

 

Thanks again for all your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok received the following defence from Lloyds over the weekend along with the AQ from the court:

------------------------------

 

1. It is admitted that the Claimant has been a customer of the Bank at all material times.

 

2. By opening an account with the Bank, the customer enteres into a commercial arrangement with the Bank for the provision of banking services. The bank is entitled, as part of that arrangement, to charge for those services. At account opening a customer is provided with details of the banks charges, currently in a leaflet. By using the account, the customer acknowledges that the charges are incorporated into the contract. For personal customers, a number of services are porvided for free, not withstanding that they are an expense to the bank.

 

3. By maintaining the account in credit, or within any limit agreed with the bank, the customer may avoid most if not all charges. If the customer fails to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments, whether by cheque, debit card, standing order or direct debit, the customer makes a requesxt for a payment from the banks own funds. If the bank makes payment, or returns the payment, it provides a service as specified in the leaflet and makes a charge in accordance with the terms of the contract....

 

4. There is no breach of contract; the charge cannot therefore be a penalty, consequently there is no requirement that the charge be a pre-estimate of the banks loss.

 

5. The customer is given advance warning of charges being imposed; statements show the charges, if any, the customer has incurred during the course of a month, and which will appear as debits on the following month's statement. Customers are warned by letter when they go overdrawn or over their agreed limit without arrangement with the bank. If the customer fails to remedy the position, any payments such as standing orders and direct debits are refused then again the customer is warned by letter.

 

6. The charges are fair and reasonably, and it is denied that they are unlawful.

 

7. The customer is notified of the charges in plain intelligible language at the conclusion of the contract, and on each monthly statment. The charge are terms wich relate to the price payable by the customer for a service provided by the bank, and pursuant to Regulation 6 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, are not subject to the assessment of fairness.

 

8. In the premises:

8.1 the charges are for banking services, and are not damages nor a penalty;

8.2 the bank is entitled by contract to impose the charges, which are fair and reasonable;

8.3 it is denied that the charges are unlawful or contravene any statute or regulation.

 

9. The claimant's claim is denied in its entirety. It is further denied that the claimant is entitled to the sum claimed or to any sum from the bank.

 

-----------------------------

 

Standard response i presume. I am just in the process of filling in the AQ and will have it delivered to court by the end of the day.

 

I have also sent off my letter to Lloyds saying that i do not accept their offer of £750 as full and final and that they should feel free to take the amount back from my account. I have had no further response from this yet nor have they debited by account with this amount.

 

Will keep you informed, Wallop

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. AQ is almost ready but wondering whether i should mention that i have received a repayment of £750 (NB i did not accept this offer of full and final settlement and wrote back to Lloyds to tell them so) in the 'Other information' section. At present i am also putting in a draft order for directions for specific disclosure. Any thoughts anyone?

 

Also, i have drafted a letter to SCM as follows:

 

-----------------------

Stuart Sheppard

Sechiari Clark and Mitchell

Brighton, East Sussex

BN1 3XJ

14 May, 2007

 

Wallop1 –v- Lloyds TSB Bank plc

Claim no: xxxxxxx

Dear Mr Sheppard

With regard to the above case, I enclose a copy of my Allocation Questionnaire, which includes a request for directions, also enclosed, to be ordered requesting full disclosure within 14 days. I have submitted these documents to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court today.

At present the claim stands at £1165.89 which includes the initial claim, interest pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act and the court fees.

The reason for this contact is to give your client another chance to settle before additional costs are added to the claim and more of the court systems time is wasted. I recently received a letter from Lloyds TSB offering me £750 in full and final settlement of this claim. I responded that I would not accept this as full and final settlement and that I required that full balance claimed of £1165.89. As I have not heard of you attending any of the court appearances to date, I can only conclude that you are only attempting to stall proceedings.

I will be including this letter in my evidence to show that I have tried to communicate to negotiate an early settlement, and to show the judge that I believe the way you are handling these cases to be an abuse of the court system process.

If you wish to contact me to arrange a full settlement please contact me on xxxxxx to do so.

Yours Faithfully

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send an updated schedule of charges, showing the 'part payment' of £759 at the bottom. If you add it to the spreedsheet as a negative the figures (interest etc) should adjust accordingly.

 

Letter to SC&M looks good to me

 

XxXxX

 

You may receive differing advice as people have had different experiences. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I offer is done so informally, without prejudice & without liability.

 

If I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

If I have been helpful, PLEASE click the scales

 

 

You may receive differing advice as people have had different experiences. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I offer is done so informally, without prejudice & without liability.

 

 

I WON !!!!

 

 

HERE WE GO AGAIN .... BRING IT ON

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks curlychic. noted about the new schedule. I will include this in my letter to SCM along with a revision to the letter to them as follows:

 

'At present the claim stands at £1172.29 which includes the initial claim, interest pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act (a revised schedule of interest is included herewith showing adjustments for the partial repayment received) and the court fees.'

 

Do i need to include any of these details to the court ie notify them about the letter from lloyds about the courtesy refund and the fact that i have not accepted it? I feel as though i should.

 

Wallop

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks curlychic. noted about the new schedule. I will include this in my letter to SCM along with a revision to the letter to them as follows:

 

'At present the claim stands at £1172.29 which includes the initial claim, interest pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act (a revised schedule of interest is included herewith showing adjustments for the partial repayment received) and the court fees.'

(sounds good to me)

 

Do i need to include any of these details to the court ie notify them about the letter from lloyds about the courtesy refund and the fact that i have not accepted it? I feel as though i should.(yes inform then that a part payment of xxx has been made and enclose an updated schedule.

 

Wallop

 

Personally speaking, i would also withdraw the £750 and put it in another account

 

XxXxX

 

You may receive differing advice as people have had different experiences. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I offer is done so informally, without prejudice & without liability.

 

If I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

  • Haha 1

If I have been helpful, PLEASE click the scales

 

 

You may receive differing advice as people have had different experiences. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I offer is done so informally, without prejudice & without liability.

 

 

I WON !!!!

 

 

HERE WE GO AGAIN .... BRING IT ON

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok, i have a court date now for September 5 so plenty of time to put together a copy of the court papers. Is there anything anybody can suggest that i can do to make them want to settle before court? I was thinking another letter to SCM

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok further to more reading i've noted that i dont have an order for any directions prior to the hearing in september. i've spoken to the court and they suggested writing in to highlight that my draft order for directions that was attached to the AQ was not followed/noticed. So heres a draft fax to the court

 

"Dear Sir/Madam

I write following receipt of the Court’s Notice of Small Claims Hearing which is due to be heard on 5 September 2007. On filing my Allocation Questionnaire I had asked the court to consider a Draft Order for Directions for specific disclosure of documents from both myself and the Defendant as I believe this will bring a rapid end to this litigation. I note, however, that this course of action was not followed as no mention was made of any directions on the Notice of Small Claims Hearing.

I would respectfully ask that the court in this case reconsider and issue an Order for Directions. I attach a copy of the Draft Order for Directions that was originally attached to my Allocation Questionnaire for your consideration. If the court feels that this course of action is inappropriate in this instance, I would ask the Court to consider an order for standard disclosure."

Any comments on this anyone? I want the judge to order directions for documents before the court date or specific disclosure so that i can get a copy of the T&Cs. Is there anything else i should put in this?

 

thanks

wallop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...