Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Reform more or less said it's what they will be campaigning about but they don't expect to be implementing the plans. Dan Neidle thinks the cost is about double the amount of Truss's plans and the IFS think the figures are out by £10s of billions.
    • Rather like farage .. Reform UK plans ‘don’t add up’ and costings are out ‘by tens of billions of pounds per year’, says IFS – UK general election live | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM As Nigel Farage launches party’s manifesto, Institute for Fiscal Studies says ‘the package as a whole is problematic’   "Reform UK has published its manifesto. They plan tax cuts which they say will cost £70bn; however our analysis shows that they’ve miscalculated, and the actual cost will be at least £93bn. Reform UK says it will fund these tax costs with £70bn of savings and additional revenue, but it provides few details. Their proposal to change Bank of England reserve rules is over-stated by at least £15bn, and the cost would likely fall on businesses and consumers, not banks. These two factors mean that Reform UK’s plans have a total unfunded cost of at least £38bn – about twice the unfunded cost of Liz Truss’ ill-fated 2022 “mini-budget”.
    • The finance company has a 50% stake (legal Owner) in the deal so I would certainly involve them. As for the outstanding £3635 bill thats owing to Mercedes in Croydon I wouldn't be in a rush to settle that just yet and keep it in abeyance as leverage.  Where are you at with Doves in Horsham ?
    • or go really bold ... Further to my request for a copy of the agreement you refer to on ( date) I made a section 78 request pursuant to the Credit Consumer Act 1974 to which you have yet to reply or respond. Pursuant to the Credit Consumer act 1974 section 78 (6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)— (a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.
    • Pers I'd stop paying the lot and get each defaulted by a dn issuance.  Defaults can't hurt future renting no Only ccj's Can't keep saying the same answers.    Dx        
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

mariejader v Abbey **DEFENCE STRUCK OUT!**WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 425
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Check the BBC news Marie Business section, your money

Abbey £4340.59 *WON* Jan 07

 

Abbey II MCOL 31/03/07 £8800.00

 

Please note..I AM NOT AN EXPERT ANYTHING WHAT I POST IS PURELY MY OPINION AND MAY BE WRONG IT IS JUST BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OR EXPERIENCE

 

Read my latest claim its a fast track potentially

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/61406-noobrider-abbey-take-2-a.html?highlight=noobrider

 

read my first claim which includes attending a directions hearing in court

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/10576-noobrider-abbey.html?highlight=noobrider

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would do a quick update.

 

My AQ was with the Judge on Wednesday, I was keeping everything crossed for an answer by Friday, but when I telephoned to check I was advised they were waiting for the "order to be sent", god knows what that means any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would do a quick update.

 

My AQ was with the Judge on Wednesday, I was keeping everything crossed for an answer by Friday, but when I telephoned to check I was advised they were waiting for the "order to be sent", god knows what that means any ideas?

 

Your waiting on the order to be sent from the court out to you, by the sounds of it. Looks like you won't be waiting long anyway.

  • Haha 1

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mariejader,

 

I'm playing the waiting game too although it sounds as though you are about to overtake me!! My AQ had to be in by 1.4.07. I rang the Court last week & was told it's waiting to go before the Judge but she couldn't give me any indication how long it would take.....suppose they're pretty busy!!!

 

I've been using the time to read up on other threads & get a couple of my other claims started.

 

Hope it won't be too much longer now!

 

Villafan

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke too soon....the Order has arrived from the Court - Aaaaaahhhhhh now the scary stuff starts!!! Best go & update my thread. I'm sure yours won't be long now, I was only a few days ahead!

 

Villafan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi foxy,

 

I was just coming to visit your thread as you've asked alot of the questions I was going to ask (thanks!!! LOL;) ) re skeleton argument etc.

 

I've just posted my Order on my thread, it doesn't have as many points as yours but sort of seems pretty straight forward.... I think!!!!

 

It's pretty scary, but comforting to know there's a few of us at the same stage to help each other along. I'll move off mariejader's thread now & come & visit yours.....sorry mariejader for highjacking your thread!!!

 

Villafan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news, I paid a visit to the Court today to see what was happening and whilst myself and my friend was talking at length with the Court Baliff the Court Manager came and found me and told me that my claim was back from the the Judge looking at it and he has struck Abbey's defence out

 

So I applied for judgement straight away I've won I think :D

 

By the way it was the same judge as this case

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/73352-defense-struck-out-judge-3.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

FANTASTIC NEWS :D

Got my fingers crossed they pay up quickly.

 

You deserve this after all the work you've put in and helping dumbo's like me with their spreadsheets.

 

Picking brains time: any ideas about completing N150. Most of the stuff I've read is small claims and I wanted to be as spcific as poss with the AQ. I know there's a thread somewhere with info about this but as usual, I've lost the link. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Trica,

 

Picking brains time: any ideas about completing N150. Most of the stuff I've read is small claims and I wanted to be as spcific as poss with the AQ

 

 

I think you would be better asking Charleyfarley that question, having said that he wanted to go fast track and his case is going small claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic news Marie!!!!:-D

 

Glad the AQ attachment did the trick, brilliant stuff!! Can you post up the wording of the order please?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic news Marie!!!!

 

Glad the AQ attachment did the trick, brilliant stuff!! Can you post up the wording of the order please?

 

As soon as I get a copy myself from the Court I will post it.

 

Thanks for you help Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...