Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I plan to send the new begging letter as following, can I ask for some suggestions?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • I thought I should send the begging letter to the prosecutor. Does the hearing means the time I need to send back by? If so, it’s June 5 
    • LoL Dx you crack me up. Thanks for the advice. I'll stay positive.
    • Utter Rubbish!! lowell dont write and beg for deals once they start court. as for your attitude, we'll thats nothing new for you.😎 you wont be quizzed, it's not like TV, simply refer to your defence/WS when answering anything the judge may ever ask. well it involves chickens. dx  
    • Thanks fk, I hope I don't have to face the court. Bless you for the reassurance. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mislead by slalesman


nosleep09
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

10 years ago i bought a tv from currys which i agreed to pay for in installments as i and my mother weere told by the salesman that they had a special offer on the tv where if i payed for it in a set amount of time there would be no interest on top. as i was 16 at the time my mother had to sign the contract. when looking at the contract i saw saw a box with some figures in it, i think it was about £50, cant remember exactly what else it said in the box. i asked the salesman if it meant that is what we would be charged, he told me to ignore that box as it would not be applicable on this particular item, so we signed. :( . i payed the installments, i payed the installments and thought that was that. then we started getting letters about paying for the remainder of the tv, two and two together and it turned out that the salesman had lied and so we refused to pay on the principle that we had been mislead. the letters eventually stopped comming until two weeks ago we received a letter from GE capital saying that we owed them £400 for this item and to stop bailffs comming we would have to arrange payment. they stated that if we payed within 2 months then they would take %50 off but £200 is still 4 times a much as what they originally demanded. i dont want to conceed defeat but i think i may have to. is there any way that i could reduce what i owe further. i know its nothing compared to the debt that some people find themselfs in but i just hate that fact that im paying for trusting a salesman

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 years ago i bought a tv from currys which i agreed to pay for in installments as i and my mother weere told by the salesman that they had a special offer on the tv where if i payed for it in a set amount of time there would be no interest on top. as i was 16 at the time my mother had to sign the contract. when looking at the contract i saw saw a box with some figures in it, i think it was about £50, cant remember exactly what else it said in the box. i asked the salesman if it meant that is what we would be charged, he told me to ignore that box as it would not be applicable on this particular item, so we signed. :( . i payed the installments, i payed the installments and thought that was that. then we started getting letters about paying for the remainder of the tv, two and two together and it turned out that the salesman had lied and so we refused to pay on the principle that we had been mislead. the letters eventually stopped comming until two weeks ago we received a letter from GE capital saying that we owed them £400 for this item and to stop bailffs comming we would have to arrange payment. they stated that if we payed within 2 months then they would take %50 off but £200 is still 4 times a much as what they originally demanded. i dont want to conceed defeat but i think i may have to. is there any way that i could reduce what i owe further. i know its nothing compared to the debt that some people find themselfs in but i just hate that fact that im paying for trusting a salesman

 

When's the last time you made a payment on this ?

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

if the last payment was outside 6 yrs then tellthem to fo away off.

 

dx100uk:smile:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the last payment i made was 9 years ago. so is there some kind of 6 year rule on this

 

If a payment has not been made and there's been no contact for 6 years then a debt becomes statute barred under the Limitation Act 1980. Once statute barred it cannot be ressurected, and for the purpose of the Limitation Act, an acknowlegement can only be in writing and signed by the alleged debtor.

 

There is a template letter in the library for this and there is also a template letter to send to stop them harrassing you under the Protection from Harrassment Act 1997.

 

You could also report them to Tradings Standards etc......

 

Good luck, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...