Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Don't give them your e-mail address, don't give them your telephone number and don't fill in their forms. They send these things to pretend they are some sort of statutory authority. In reality they are a disgusting cowboy company who use sixth-rate solicitors who can't get any other work so are reduced to doing everything on the cheap with no due diligence for private parking companies. Your letter is meant to totally ignore their procedures and show you've sussed them for who they are.  From their point of view it would be better to drop you like a hot potato and instead concentrate on going after people daft enough to give in. That's why I went on & on about their previous court humiliations, to show them that if they continue with you they'll just end up with another thrashing.
    • Hello and thank you for that It says as follows 1 - Driving without due care and attention - sec 3 Road Traffic Act 1988 2. - Failing to stop at a road traffic accident - sec 170 (4) Road Traffic Act 1988 3.   Failing to report road traffic accident - sec 170 (4) Road Traffic Act 1988 To be honest, none of the above occurred. Yes, they say I have to tell them who the driver was, but as I am the only one using my car it would be me anyway. Due to the location of the alleged offences I am pretty sure it is to do with this lorry driver.  I am happy to say it was me driving, but should I also give a written account of my side of events , as they have kindly provided a blank piece of paper for me. But not sure as these are criminal charges, whether I should put anything in writing at this stage I don't really know what it's about and don't know on what evidence these allegations are based on, given the fact none of the above actually occured.
    • This sounds like someone has alleged that you wee involved in an accident which caused damage or injury to a third party or their property. If the request is issued under Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act (and it should mention that) you are obliged to respond by providing the driver's details. But that is all you are obliged to do at this stage. As far as the failing to stop/report charges are concerned, you could inform the police that you did neither because, as far as you are aware, no accident requiring you to stop occurred.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

mislead by slalesman


nosleep09
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

10 years ago i bought a tv from currys which i agreed to pay for in installments as i and my mother weere told by the salesman that they had a special offer on the tv where if i payed for it in a set amount of time there would be no interest on top. as i was 16 at the time my mother had to sign the contract. when looking at the contract i saw saw a box with some figures in it, i think it was about £50, cant remember exactly what else it said in the box. i asked the salesman if it meant that is what we would be charged, he told me to ignore that box as it would not be applicable on this particular item, so we signed. :( . i payed the installments, i payed the installments and thought that was that. then we started getting letters about paying for the remainder of the tv, two and two together and it turned out that the salesman had lied and so we refused to pay on the principle that we had been mislead. the letters eventually stopped comming until two weeks ago we received a letter from GE capital saying that we owed them £400 for this item and to stop bailffs comming we would have to arrange payment. they stated that if we payed within 2 months then they would take %50 off but £200 is still 4 times a much as what they originally demanded. i dont want to conceed defeat but i think i may have to. is there any way that i could reduce what i owe further. i know its nothing compared to the debt that some people find themselfs in but i just hate that fact that im paying for trusting a salesman

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 years ago i bought a tv from currys which i agreed to pay for in installments as i and my mother weere told by the salesman that they had a special offer on the tv where if i payed for it in a set amount of time there would be no interest on top. as i was 16 at the time my mother had to sign the contract. when looking at the contract i saw saw a box with some figures in it, i think it was about £50, cant remember exactly what else it said in the box. i asked the salesman if it meant that is what we would be charged, he told me to ignore that box as it would not be applicable on this particular item, so we signed. :( . i payed the installments, i payed the installments and thought that was that. then we started getting letters about paying for the remainder of the tv, two and two together and it turned out that the salesman had lied and so we refused to pay on the principle that we had been mislead. the letters eventually stopped comming until two weeks ago we received a letter from GE capital saying that we owed them £400 for this item and to stop bailffs comming we would have to arrange payment. they stated that if we payed within 2 months then they would take %50 off but £200 is still 4 times a much as what they originally demanded. i dont want to conceed defeat but i think i may have to. is there any way that i could reduce what i owe further. i know its nothing compared to the debt that some people find themselfs in but i just hate that fact that im paying for trusting a salesman

 

When's the last time you made a payment on this ?

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

if the last payment was outside 6 yrs then tellthem to fo away off.

 

dx100uk:smile:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the last payment i made was 9 years ago. so is there some kind of 6 year rule on this

 

If a payment has not been made and there's been no contact for 6 years then a debt becomes statute barred under the Limitation Act 1980. Once statute barred it cannot be ressurected, and for the purpose of the Limitation Act, an acknowlegement can only be in writing and signed by the alleged debtor.

 

There is a template letter in the library for this and there is also a template letter to send to stop them harrassing you under the Protection from Harrassment Act 1997.

 

You could also report them to Tradings Standards etc......

 

Good luck, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...