Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help please with AQ


charlie14
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Can anybody help me - just filling in my AQ and wondering what info to put in Section G. Shall I use the "new" AQ info or the "old" AQ info or leave it blank?

 

My claim is for £3000 and I am planning to attach my schedule with the additional 8%.

 

 

Help please?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Charley

Am in the same position as you - am a bit confused about this new format as it looks as though it is being recommended as an attachment to allocation questionaire.

Sorry not any help solving your problem but thought you may appreciate the solidarity!!

Olly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sorry for such a stupid question but what is an AQ, is it allocation questionnaire, and what is it for?

 

I am in the process of a claim on behalf of my boyfriend and got confirmation this morning that Barclay's entered a defence just before midnight last night, yesterday being last day they were able to enter one by the way!

 

I am now in the process of using the Basic Court Bundle section on the website to get all the bits together.... do I need an allocation questionaire too.... really confused at the moment with all the legal stuff any help would be really appreciated :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the allocaton questionairre is waht you send next to the court with the details of your claim and the court fee.

There is a thread on this site which tells you exactly what to put in each box and you can even fill it in and print it out and then just sign it.

Claim for £3,044.86 ongoing with Barclays-soon to be complete-I hope!!!Won for the Daughter £915 from Barclays!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Coyotesj

Am at the same point as you. The last day Barclays could enter a defense was Sunday but as it wasn't a working day was given till Monday evening. They apparently submitted a defense on Friday 16th. I have received my Allocation Questionaire (AQ) today with Barclays defense (see my thread Here We Go!!! posted today). You will get that in the next couple of days. Don't worry there are lots of people here that can talk us through the process whatever happens.

Olly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the support! I will keep an eye on your thread olly83. I am getting a bit scared cos when I claimed my charges from Halifax it didn't get this far before they coughed up, think Barclay's are trying to drag everyone of these claims out as long as possible so they can continue earning money from our money, Grrrrrrrrrrr!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Can anybody help me - just filling in my AQ and wondering what info to put in Section G. Shall I use the "new" AQ info or the "old" AQ info or leave it blank?

 

My claim is for £3000 and I am planning to attach my schedule with the additional 8%.

 

 

Help please?

Thanks

 

Hi Charlie,

 

In section G you need to either add this if using the old AQ method:

 

"I am respectfully requesting my claim be heard via the small claims

track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and

not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the

defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed

or even reflect their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their

actual costs and I am surprised the defendant did not counterclaim

for these, as I would have paid them without argument. However,

the continuing problem is (in common with the hundreds of other

cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the

banks are refusing to reveal the details of their penalty-charging

regime, and that the charges they apply to accounts for exceeding

overdraft limits and so on are entirely disproportionate to the

actual costs the banks incur. As the banks have a fiduciary duty

towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly

and in utmost good faith. Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that

the court in this case, not withstanding allocations to the small

claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in

the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid

end to this litigation. I have attached the schedule of the charges

I am claiming for to this allocation questionnaire to show a

breakdown of the amounts for the courts perusal.

I believe the case will take no longer than 1 hour".

Or if using the new draft order for directions then add this and attach the Draft Order for Directions to the AQ:

The Claimant proposes the attached draft order for directions, for the courts due consideration. If ordered, the Claimant believes these directions will allow the overriding objective's to be furthered in that they will fully identify the most fundamental issues in dispute (as detailed below), and allow them to be assessed so that this claim may proceed justly and expediously.

 

The crux upon which this claim rests is the true cost incurred by the Defendant as a result of the contractual breach from which its charges arise. If the Defendant cannot substantiate the cost of each charge as proportionate to its loss incurred, it has charged contractual penalties contrary to the UTCCR 1999 and common law principles established since the early 1900's.

 

In the event that the Defendants charges were accepted as being a fee for a service (which is denied), examination of its true costs is required to determine whether the price is reasonable as required by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

As the law relating to contractual penalties is long established, the Claimant believes the outstanding issues to be of fact. Accordingly, the Claimant respectfully requests that the claim be allocated to the small claims track, and estimates that the hearing of the claim should last no longer than one hour.

Firstly you need to decide which you are doing.

See here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html

I would recomend the new Draft Order personally but its up to you.

Hope that helps

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everybody for your input!

I decided on the old version and tweaked it a bit but doesnt seem (reading the threads) that it makes a huge amount of difference as Barclays will just protract everything and take as long as poss.

I think now I wait for their AQ which will obviously be sent in at the last possible moment then the courts will set a date or throw it out.

 

Anybody know what Bristol County Courts are like???

 

Coyotesj and olly83 - let me know what happens?

 

Did anybody see Watchdog last night and apparently there is a prog on ITV1 on Friday - moneysavingexpert.com who is looking at it all.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Charlie

I decided to go with the new version. Will be interesting to see the effect, if any, on Barclays cough-up timescale of the added pressure if the new draft order is implemented by the judge. By all accounts they will settle just a matter of when. However the resurgence of publicity informing people of their right to reclaim unfair charges in the wake of the announcement of huge profits by the big four could put courts under enormous pressure (not to mention the banks litigation departments!!). An interesting few months ahead!

Will watch your thread with interest

Olly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Olly

Read your thread last night - will keep this one updated and as you say it will be interesting to see if it makes the slightest bit of difference!

 

Interesting to know what other people are putting - any comments anyone?

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

Recieved my allocation questionnaire on Friday and have been reading with interest the "new" version for part G of the N149, taking it in tomorrow!

Even though using this in is a bit scarier than using the "old" version I have decided to go for it as Barclays are starting to get on my nerves with their lack of urgency!

 

As olly83 mentioned above it will be interesting to see if it speeds up the timescale of when Barclays are settling...... just in addition I read that some courts have ignored the draft order, does anyone know which courts they are :confused: , mine has been allocated to Liverpool County Court any help will be really appreciated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...