Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Are HFC Desperate?


121o121
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Could you please put into 'Idiot-speak' what a CCA is?

 

Really

 

I may also need illustrations, instruction manual, the lot

HALIFAX

Settled in Full

24/10/06
£2228.70

HFC

Settled in Full

May 2007, Default removal and £640 refnded

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I too am in the lucky position of having a loan account with HFC, taken out when I purchased a PC through PC World.

 

During part of the loan I was unemployed and as a result some of the monthly payments were bounced by Nat West.

 

Therefore I was charged by NWB for the failed direct debit and by HFC for the non payment of the instalment.

 

My question is can I claim the HFC charges back in the same way that I am with Nut West?

 

Thanks

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you please put into 'Idiot-speak' what a CCA is?

 

Really

 

I may also need illustrations, instruction manual, the lot

 

 

Consumer Credit Agreement - as regulated by the Consumer Credit Act. It's the document you sign to say you wish to take the loan and be bound by the terms of the agreement. Without it, a bank cannot prove that the agreement between you and the bank exists and cannot enforce the terms of the agreement (i.e. that you owe them money).

 

Someone else will need to give links to other threads on instructions etc as I've not read them all.... yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The truthful answer (and I use to work for HFC/Beneficial) is that as a company which doesn't advertise to new customers, most business is driven through (and this is the logical process);

 

You set up a retail account through Dixons for example,

HFC then calls you to say you're a good customer why don't you come in because we can look at consol/home improvements/new car etc...

 

You then come in and sign, you get taken off the list for 3 - 6months, then you come back on the list and we call you all the time to keep you in debt with us and that's how HFC makes it's money.

 

I say this as a stark warning to all - Stay away from HFC, never have i worked for such an inept company. Really shocking. Thankfully I no longer work for them.

 

I used to work there too and I whole heartedly agree with Dirty_Dog.

 

The branch staff are generally quite young with little or no financial experience themselves. They are sent of a 4 week intensive sales course (yes, that's a sales course, not a financial advice course, where they are taught how to overcome your objections and close in on the sale...) and then sent back to the branches to sell loans over the phone and invite customers into the branch to sell the loan, plus PPI and as many general insurance products as they can. Their turnover of staff is very high due to the pressures placed on them to achieve targets.

 

What's even more worrying, is that most of their compliance department know very little of the FSA's Principles for Businesses or even the FSA Handbook.

 

From the top down, it is a sales organisation through and through. The Regional Managers tear the Branch Managers to pieces for not achieving targets, who in turn tear the Customer Account Managers to pieces. There is virtually no personal development and little investment in staff.

 

If you watched the Whitleblower programme about Barclays recently, you'll not be surprised to learn that that was almost identical to every Beneficial Finance branch.

 

I actually feel sorry for HSBC - they acquired Household Int for access to the North American consumer market. I don't think they fully understood the implications of acquiring HFC Bank as part of the deal. HFC Bank wanted to have the HSBC name in the rebranded branch network and the call it "HSBC Finance". It ended up being called Beneficial Finance with the HSBC logo - HSBC's brand name is massive and they didn't want HFC Bank to damage it!

 

There are some good people there, but their numbers are dropping fast as they (like me) leave to work for real financial services companies and not telemarketing companies that have little, or no regard for their customers.

 

If you ever need a loan, go to a real bank.

 

(p.s. Dirty_Dog - I think we've probably met! :eek: :eek: )

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too am in the lucky position of having a loan account with HFC, taken out when I purchased a PC through PC World.

 

During part of the loan I was unemployed and as a result some of the monthly payments were bounced by Nat West.

 

Therefore I was charged by NWB for the failed direct debit and by HFC for the non payment of the instalment.

 

My question is can I claim the HFC charges back in the same way that I am with Nut West?

 

Thanks

 

Yes.

 

There is nothing to stop you challenging these charges.

 

HFC will probably respond and try to say that your account doesn't qualify, quoting the recent OFT advice on credit card charges.

 

Ignore that response as your case is about penalty charges/excessive fees which are disproportionate to the administration costs incurred by the bank.

 

You may also want to consider a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Just because the level of a charge is listed in the account terms and conditions doesn't mean it's fair.

 

Refer them to Principle 6 of the FSA's Principles for Businesses:

A firm must pay due regard to the interests of its customers and treat them fairly.

 

In order to complain to the FOS, you will need to have exhausted the bank's internal complaints procedure first. This is done when the firm issues their "Final Response" on the matter. Then you can refer to the FOS to arbitrate. The FOS decision will not prejudice any legal action you may take and their services are free to you, but will cost the firm £360 regardless of whether the complaint is upheld or rejected.

 

Hope this helps.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Scooby

 

Many thanks for the post.

 

One other question if I may.

 

As this is a loan account, can I request statements from HFC in the same way as I have from Nat West or will I need to alter my request?

 

Thanks

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading the original part of the thread, can you clarify

 

If they cannot provide a copy of the original agreement then they can not enforce the agreement and you do not have to recognise the account.

 

I had a flexi account with them for many years, had the same calls come in and review your account and lets see what we can do?????

 

I overstretched myself and currently paying minimum ammount each month.

 

So they have had a lot of money off me over the years but want to get rid of them.

 

So I CCA them then dispute the account is that what is being said or Am I dreaming

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scooby

 

Many thanks for the post.

 

One other question if I may.

 

As this is a loan account, can I request statements from HFC in the same way as I have from Nat West or will I need to alter my request?

 

Thanks

 

You can request a detailed breakdown of your account history - they should provide this free of charge (at least, they used to).

 

The only difference really is that as a loan account is not a transactional account, they are under no obligation to send you a regular statement, but they must be able to produce one upon request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading the original part of the thread, can you clarify

 

If they cannot provide a copy of the original agreement then they can not enforce the agreement and you do not have to recognise the account.

 

I had a flexi account with them for many years, had the same calls come in and review your account and lets see what we can do?????

 

I overstretched myself and currently paying minimum ammount each month.

 

So they have had a lot of money off me over the years but want to get rid of them.

 

So I CCA them then dispute the account is that what is being said or Am I dreaming

 

This is how I understand it, so long as they are unable to produce the original legal agreement. Of course, they would only send you a certified copy.

 

Without the legal agreement, they cannot enforce the agreement against you without a court order.

 

I would have to defer the legal technicalities to someone else on these forums who knows more about the Consumer Credit Act and the court processes. My knowledge lies in my past experience of HFC Bank and the regulatory environment. Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately!?) I didn't study hard enough at school to become a lawyer :-D

 

I imagine your flexi account was either a Personal Loan Plus, Beneficial Loan Manager or the Household Flexible Loan. All 3 accounts are pretty poor from the customer's perspective and great from the bank's. If you pay the minimum monthly payment, you pay the maximum monthly interest. If you can't get shot of the account through HFC's poor administration, I'd suggest shopping around for a low rate loan, or you'll have the flexi-loan for years longer.

 

You may also want to consider raising an official complaint to them about their sales practices. At the end of the day, they are supposed to be a "responsible lender". If their actions caused or encouraged you to overstretch your budget, they are equally as responsible as you.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely agree with Scooby Doo2.

The most effective way to deal with HFC in this scenario is to log an official complaint (which they need to deal with in an agreed timescale) saying that you were mis-sold the account (which is probably true). Then ask them to provide the original signed credit agreement. Again, if your branch was anything like where I was based, admin, records and general good house keeping is non existent and hence won’t be able to provide evidence.

There is also added pressure on the staff to still deliver loan numbers and business so resources will be limited so hopefully HFC will fold over and come to an acceptable agreement for you.

Good luck and keep on pushing, you’ll get there in the end.

As for you Scoob who’s region/division were you in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just subscribing to this thread as in the same exact position. Loan for a pc from pcworld.

My loan was defaulted back in 2005 and I paid up.

I am sending away for a copy of the agreement. If they are not able to produce this, would that mean that I can actually claim the entire loan amount back from them (plus usual interest) and have the default removed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is taken the wrong way but reading through your comments as I have my own issues with HFC and cant help but notice lots of people are accusing HFC of overcommiting there customers, surely you know what you commit to when you go into the branches. I to am attempting to claim back charges and have spoken to a few helpful people at Beneficial finance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is taken the wrong way but reading through your comments as I have my own issues with HFC and cant help but notice lots of people are accusing HFC of overcommiting there customers, surely you know what you commit to when you go into the branches. I to am attempting to claim back charges and have spoken to a few helpful people at Beneficial finance.

 

HFC Bank Ltd, now trading as Beneficial Finance is a highly focused sales organisation. Their staff are strongly incentivised to sell loans and general insurance products.

 

They do have some safeguards in place, a budget planner if you will, that helps them "prove" a client can afford their repayments. However the "Credit Policy Matrix" as they call it, has default amounts for normal expenditure on food, fuel, gas, electric etc. Before I left the company (less than 12 months ago) these figures were last reviewed in the early 1990's are do not truly reflect what a client can really afford.

 

The other problem is, whenever you put money to a sales target, human nature dictates that some people will always take the path of least resistance to achieve it. To give HFC Bank some credit, they do take action against staff who knowingly breach company policies or try to circumvent the built in safeguards. Examples can include artificially inflating a client's income, reducing expenditure on items such as council tax etc. Spookily, a lot of customers only pay £50 a month for council tax.... I wish I did!

 

There are some good people in the branches but remember, they have an immense pressure on them to hit their growth, PPI and collections targets. HFC Bank as a whole has some serious delinquency (bad debts) issues and these could be seen as a reflection of the bank's previous lending practices / policies.

 

All regulated lenders have a responsibility to assess their customer's needs and to ensure they don't over extend them. It's easily done and customers often don't realise they are doing it. Therefore the bank would also have to take some (but not all) responsibility for the lending decision. There is an inherent risk in lending that even the best underwriter could not foresee, which is why they charge an interest rate to reflect the risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a head office address for Beneficial finance? All I can find on their website is their branch addresses.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you v. much.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Yesterday I received my Credit Agreement, so that answers my request under the CCA 1974.

 

I can't believe what I signed back then (and I quote).

 

Amount of Loan : £ 5,000.00 ("Loan")

Add : £ 2,103.16 Interest (APR 27.4%)

 

Total Payable : £7,103.16

 

Life Assurance : £ 247.55

Accident / Sickness : £ 561.12

Interest : £ 340.09

 

Total Payable : £1,148.76

 

Combined Total Payable : £8,251.92

 

Will be rid of them on 18th August 2009. I am crossing each payment off my calander, and I take pleasure in knowing I'm over the half way mark.

 

Paying an extra £3,251.92 for a £5,000 loan is a valuable lesson. One I've learnt the hard way (as I'm sure many others have).

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I received my Credit Agreement, so that answers my request under the CCA 1974.

 

I can't believe what I signed back then (and I quote).

 

 

 

Will be rid of them on 18th August 2009. I am crossing each payment off my calander, and I take pleasure in knowing I'm over the half way mark.

 

Paying an extra £3,251.92 for a £5,000 loan is a valuable lesson. One I've learnt the hard way (as I'm sure many others have).

 

If you have maintained a good credit history, I would suggest you get a settlement figure from HFC and get a quote from another company over the same period of time (or shorter if you can afford it). It won't be hard to find an APR below 27.4%!!

 

Also, you repayments would be cheaper if you took the loan without PPI. I personally feel PPI is way to over-priced for the benefit it provides.

 

If you carry on paying your loan back to HFC, you are contributing to their profits (and the whopping bonuses they pay the branch staff, managers etc).

 

You could probably knock 3-4 months off the 15 months you've got left if you re-finance. Would you prefer to have the money in your pocket or HFC's?? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

CERTAINLY NOT THE LOCAL BRANCH NEVER

 

THEY WOULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS ABOUT

I sent a CCA request to my local HFC (Beneficial Finance) and the 40 days is now up. I have not had any reply whatsoever. Does this mean that I have to start all over by sending CCA to head office??????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trevor

 

Did you send them recorded or special delivery? Can you see whether your £1 cheque has been cashed?

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've just called me again. I'm gonna write a letter to the branch asking them to stop contacting me regarding their products / services and ask them to remove my telephone number from their records.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 121o121

I sent recorded and have proof.

I heard from HFC Birmingham last week. They included a form to fill in and return. They wanted my DOB, my full name AND driving licence or passport.

I did not fill it in but sent them a default notice instead.

No they have still not cashed my cheque but they asked for £10 payment in the letter with form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

121o121 - hope you don't mind me butting in, but are there no repayment figures on your agreement. If not then it may unenforceable but you need to ask those in the know. I'm pretty sure it should have the number of payments and the payment rate and the date of payment. Maybe well worth checking out. This is why they may keep calling you.

Trevor 33 - sounds as if they haven't got an agreement for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...